이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Neurocomputational Dynamics of Cooperation (COBRA)

2026년 8월 6일 업데이트: Timothy Allen, University of Pittsburgh
The purpose of this study is to understand brain function, how people make decisions when they interact with others, and how brain function and behavior relate to personality traits.

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Problems in cooperating with others define antagonism, a transdiagnostic dimension of psychopathology expressed in personality and externalizing disorders. People high on antagonism are prone to aggressive, callous, and exploitative behaviors that damage relationships and incur substantial costs in the form of productivity loss, substance misuse, and criminality. While clinical theories link antagonism to deficits in social cognition, it is hard to deny that exploiting others requires an understanding of their mind. This apparent contradiction can be resolved by distinguishing between two facets of antagonism: callousness and exploitativeness. Prior work by the investigators and preliminary data inform the hypothesis that exploitativeness reflects an enhanced capacity to learn about the mental states and behaviors of others coupled with an increased sensitivity to personal, rather than shared, rewards. In contrast, callousness reflects a broader insensitivity to social feedback. The investigators hypothesize that these dissociable social learning processes are instantiated in canonical circuits that expanded during anthropogenesis to support mentalizing and self-directed thought. These learning signals, which track behaviorally salient features of the social environment, are integrated in the posterior hub of the default network (DN) where they drive adaptive cooperation. This study proposes to test these hypotheses in two samples elevated on antagonism. At the behavioral level, participants are characterized using a battery of personality and psychopathology measures, social and reward-based decision-making tasks, and corresponding hierarchically estimated reinforcement learning (RL) models (Aim 1). In a model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, model-derived learning signals and facets of antagonism are linked to underlying neural activity during cooperative decision-making (Aim 2). Leveraging the multi-timescale design of our study, the investigators plan to relate neurocomputational signatures of callousness and exploitativeness to mentalizing abilities, multi-informant reports of momentary interpersonal behavior, and prospective stress generation. Certain elements of study design are withheld from this record to protect the scientific integrity of the study design.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

1612

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Michelle M Berry, MPS
  • 전화번호: 424-380-1194
  • 이메일: berrymic@pitt.edu

연구 연락처 백업

연구 장소

  • 미국
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 미국, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh, Bellefield Towers
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Timothy A Allen, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Alexandre Dombrovski, MD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

설명

Online cohort inclusion criteria:

  • English fluency
  • US residency
  • Owner of a desktop or laptop computer
  • Adult aged 18-100

Online cohort exclusion criteria:

  • Participants who have participated in an earlier version of the study
  • Inability to consent
  • Self-reported history of neurological disorder or brain damage
  • Self-endorsed history of psychosis or mania

Clinical cohort inclusion criteria:

  • Adult aged 20-60 years old
  • English fluency
  • Owner of a smartphone with celluar data

Clinical cohort exclusion criteria:

  • Inability to consent
  • Self-reported history of neurological disorder or brain damage
  • Clinician-rated psychosis or mania in the last 6 months
  • Current intoxication or withdrawal
  • Estimated IQ < 70
  • fMRI safety concerns
  • Pregnancy
  • Lack of stable psychiatric treatment (e.g., medication dosage, therapy modality) for the previous two months

Informant inclusion criteria:

  • Adult aged 18+ years old
  • English fluency
  • Owner of a smartphone with celluar data
  • Must have 4+ interactions/week with the participant for at least 6 months prior to study baseline

Informant exclusion criteria:

- Lack of a smartphone with cellular data at study baseline

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 기초 과학
  • 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Online Cohort
The online cohort will include 718 adults ages 18-100 who will complete 1) a battery of behavioral tasks designed to assess social learning and mentalizing abilities, and 2) self-report measures assessing personality, externalizing symptoms, interpersonal functioning, and psychopathology.
행동: Social Learning Task Battery, Online Cohort
In the primary study task, participants engage in a modified iterative trust game. Participant choices earn feedback in the form of monetary gains or losses. All participants are debriefed on the motivation behind study task at the end of their visit.
실험적: Clinical Cohort
The study will enroll up to 416 clinical-cohort participants, with an anticipated final eligible sample of 239 adults ages 20-60 who will complete 1) a structured clinical interview and neuropsychological assessments, 2) self-report measures assessing personality, externalizing symptoms, interpersonal functioning, and psychopathology, 3) lab-based tasks designed to assess social learning and mentalizing abilities while monitoring physiological responding with Biopac, 4) task-based fMRI, 5) 21-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol, and 6) additional self-report questionnaires at three yearly follow-ups. The investigators expect to enroll 416 participants for the start of the protocol to yield 239 final eligible participants to complete fMRI and EMA.
행동: Social Learning Task Battery, Clinical Cohort
In the primary study task, participants engage in a modified iterative trust game. The task is completed in the fMRI scanner and takes about 35 minutes. Participant choices earn feedback in the form of monetary gains or losses. All participants are debriefed on the motivation behind the task at the end of their visit.
간섭 없음: Informants
Additionally, 2 informants (ages 18+) for each participant will be recruited to complete self-report measures, one of whom will also enroll in EMA.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Participant-level Coaxing Score
기간: During behavioral task visit at study baseline (clinical cohort) or during single online study session (online cohort)
Participant coaxing behavior will be measured during the primary social learning task. Coaxing will be operationalized as the difference in the participant's return rate between exchange and secrecy modes on trials in which the coplayer decides not to share. In exchange mode, the participant knows whether the coplayer chose to share or keep the monetary incentive before indicating whether they would return it. In secrecy mode, the participant must make the return decision before learning the coplayer's choice. The coaxing score is calculated as the exchange-mode return rate minus the secrecy-mode return rate. Scores range from -1 to 1, with positive values indicating greater strategic coaxing and 0 indicating no difference between modes.
During behavioral task visit at study baseline (clinical cohort) or during single online study session (online cohort)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Mean Informant-rated Momentary Manipulativeness
기간: Post-baseline 21-day EMA period within year 1 of the study
Manipulativeness will be assessed using the study-specific Interpersonal Dynamics EMA Battery. The informant-rated manipulativeness scale contains 3 items, each rated from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). At each assessment, responses to the 3 items will be averaged to produce a momentary manipulativeness score that ranges from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater informant-rated manipulativeness.
Post-baseline 21-day EMA period within year 1 of the study
Latent Mentalizing Factor
기간: Baseline
A latent mentalizing factor will be derived using CFA, with participants' scores on three social cognition tasks serving as indicators. The latent factor will be standardized to a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1 in the study sample and therefore has no fixed theoretical minimum or maximum. Higher factor scores indicate greater mentalizing ability.
Baseline
Interpersonal Stress
기간: At 12, 24, and 36 months after baseline
Interpersonal stress will be assessed using the marital- or partner-relationship and other-relationship life domains of the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults. At each follow-up, the frequency scores for stressors in these two domains will be averaged to produce an interpersonal stress score. The score ranges from a minimum of 0 stressors, with no limit on reported stressor maximums. Higher scores indicate more frequent exposure to interpersonal relationship stressors.
At 12, 24, and 36 months after baseline

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

University of Pittsburgh

협력자

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Emory University
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Timothy A Allen, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 9월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2031년 6월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2031년 6월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 8월 6일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 8월 6일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 8월 12일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 8월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 8월 6일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 8월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • STUDY25050217
  • R01MH140901 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared via the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA) in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) Data Management and Sharing Policy. Data will be de-identified and made available to qualified researchers upon request after publication of primary results or completion of the study, as outlined in the NIH-approved Data Sharing Plan.

Task code will be posted on GitHub and/or OSF.

IPD 공유 기간

All data will be deposited to NDA starting 12 months after the award begins and will be deposited every six months thereafter following the usual NDA data submission dates.

IPD and supporting information will be available when the award ends (anticipated 06/30/2031). NDA will make decisions about how long to preserve the data, but that data archive has not deleted any deposited data up to now.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Deidentified data will be findable for the research community through the NDA Collection that will be established when this application is funded. For all publications, an NDA study will be created. Each of those studies is assigned a digital object identifier (DOI). This data DOI will be referenced in the publication to allow the research community easy access to the exact data used in the publication.

To request access to the data, qualified researchers will use the standard processes at NDA, and the NDA Data Access Committee will decide which requests to grant. The standard NDA data access process allows access for one year and is renewable.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다