Mcgill Core Stabilization Exercises VS Sahrmann Core Control Protocol on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With NSCLBP (MGCS VS SCCP)
Comparative Effects of Mcgill Core Stabilization Exercises and Sahrmann Core Control Protocol on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain
Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with persistent pain, functional disability, reduced physical activity and impaired quality of life. The thesis explains that impaired core stability, poor neuromuscular control, muscle imbalance and faulty movement patterns can contribute to persistent low back pain. Exercise-based rehabilitation is therefore an important component of conservative management.
The study was designed as a randomized clinical trial conducted in an orthopedic and physiotherapy clinic. The study population consisted of males and females with NSCLBP. Participants were divided into two treatment groups: Group A received McGill Core Stabilization Exercises, consisting of modified curl-up, side plank and bird-dog exercises, while Group B received the Sahrmann Core Control Protocol, consisting of progressive core-control exercises from Level 1 to Level 5.
The primary outcome measures were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain intensity and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability. Assessments were performed before and after the rehabilitation intervention.this study aims advantage to its individualized, movement-specific approach and emphasis on correcting faulty movement patterns and improving neuromuscular control.
調査の概要
状態
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Faisalābad、Punjab Province、パキスタン、38000
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , The University of Faisalabad
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:• Age 18 to 45 years (male\female)
- Diagnosed with NSCLBP for more than 12 weeks
- Pain intensity ≥ 3/10 (NPRS).
- ODI score ≥ 20%
- Not receiving any physiotherapy in the last 4 weeks
- Able to perform exercise and attend follow-up sessions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Radiculopathy or neurological deficits
- History of spinal surgery
- Red flags (cancer, fracture, infection)
- Pregnancy
- Cardiopulmonary disease limiting exercise
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：McGill core stabilization group
mcgill core stability exercises has three exercise of mcgill (curl-up, side plank, bird dog) done in order to must maintain a neutral spine while using controlled, painless motions to engage the deep stabilizing muscles.
|
To conduct mcgill core stability exercises, three exercise of mcgill (curl-up, side plank, bird dog) done in order to must maintain a neutral spine while using controlled, painless motions to engage the deep stabilizing muscles. To perform a curl-up, lie on back with one knee bent, position hands under lower back, softly brace midsection, and lift just head and shoulder blades for a short hold without bending your spine.To perform the side plank, lie on side with elbow underneath shoulder, brace core and lift your hips into a straight line from head to toe. You must keep up this position without permitting trunk to droop. the bird dog, which requires kneeling on hands and knees, bracing the core and carefully extending one arm and opposite leg while maintaining a stable trunk and level back for a brief hold before switching to the other side. Exercises done with slowly, focus on stability rather than range of motion or exercises done 10 reputation with 10 second hold |
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Sahrmann core control Protocol Group
Participants perform 5 different levels of sahrmann core control protocol patient exercises, including heel slide, single leg lift, alternate leg lift, alternate leg extension during e session and double leg lowering which are a progressive series of core stability exercises.
|
The exercises are performed in stages, from simple movements to more complicated ones, including leg lifts, single-leg extensions and double-leg lowers.
The main point, at all levels, is maintaining the pelvis.
One commonality through all levels is maintaining a neutral lower back no arching, no tilting, no rib flaring.
This progression of movement is used to help the core learn how to stabilize the spine during functional tasks to enhance lumbopelvic stability, motor control, and promote proper movement patterns while reducing low back pain.
The exercise lasted for ten seconds in the final position of the level.
Each of the five levels was separated by a 1 minute break interval
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
時間枠：baseline week 0 and 6-week
|
For pain intensity numeric rating pain scale will be used The NPRS asks the patient to rate their pain on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild pain 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe pain Patients choose a number that best describes their present pain, average pain, or worst pain
|
baseline week 0 and 6-week
|
|
OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
時間枠：baseline week 0 and week6
|
Osvestry disability index scale use for NSLBP. The ODI contains 10 sections, each assessing a different functional area, degree of pain, Personal care (washing/dressing), Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Social life, Traveling Each section is scored 0-5, where: 0 = No disability 5 = Maximum disability The patient selects one statement per section that best describes their condition |
baseline week 0 and week6
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Akodu A, Tella B and Olujobi O (2015) Effect of stabilization exercise on pain and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. African Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences 7(1): 7-11. Alqhtani RS, Ahmed H, Ghulam et al.(2024) Efficacy of core-strengthening and intensive dynamic back exercises on pain core muscle endurance and functional disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain A randomized comparative study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13(2): 475-489 Ammar TA (2019) McGill exercises versus conventional exercises in chronic low back pain. Life Science Journal 9(5): 393-397. Baghani P, Naserpour N and Piri H (2023) Supervised group exercise therapy versus home based exercise therapy: the effect of mcgill exercises on pain, disability and trunk stability in middle-aged women with non-specific chronic low back pain. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal 13(2): 127-134. Chakraborty J, Kumar P and Sarkar B (2019) Comparative study of motor control exercises and global core stabilization exercises on pain, rom and function in subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 9(8): 116-123. Chan E, Nadzalan A, Othman Z et al. (2020) The short-term effects of progressive vs conventional core stability exercise in rehabilitation of nonspecific chronic low back pain. Sains Malays 49(10): 2527-37. Chiarotto A and Koes BW (2022) Nonspecific low back pain. New England Journal of Medicine 38(6): 1732-1740. Childs JD, Piva SR and Fritz JM (2020) Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine Rehab Journal 30(11): 1331-1334. Eroglu S and Karatas G (2021) The effect of low back pain on quality of life and anxiety levels in women. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi 7(1): 212-219. Fatoye F, Gebrye T and Odeyemi I (2019) Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2024-MS-PT-019
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。