Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Mcgill Core Stabilization Exercises VS Sahrmann Core Control Protocol on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With NSCLBP (MGCS VS SCCP)

15 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: University of Faisalabad

Comparative Effects of Mcgill Core Stabilization Exercises and Sahrmann Core Control Protocol on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with persistent pain, functional disability, reduced physical activity and impaired quality of life. The thesis explains that impaired core stability, poor neuromuscular control, muscle imbalance and faulty movement patterns can contribute to persistent low back pain. Exercise-based rehabilitation is therefore an important component of conservative management.

The study was designed as a randomized clinical trial conducted in an orthopedic and physiotherapy clinic. The study population consisted of males and females with NSCLBP. Participants were divided into two treatment groups: Group A received McGill Core Stabilization Exercises, consisting of modified curl-up, side plank and bird-dog exercises, while Group B received the Sahrmann Core Control Protocol, consisting of progressive core-control exercises from Level 1 to Level 5.

The primary outcome measures were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain intensity and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability. Assessments were performed before and after the rehabilitation intervention.this study aims advantage to its individualized, movement-specific approach and emphasis on correcting faulty movement patterns and improving neuromuscular control.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

44

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Punjab Province
      • Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Paquistão, 38000
        • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , The University of Faisalabad

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:• Age 18 to 45 years (male\female)

  • Diagnosed with NSCLBP for more than 12 weeks
  • Pain intensity ≥ 3/10 (NPRS).
  • ODI score ≥ 20%
  • Not receiving any physiotherapy in the last 4 weeks
  • Able to perform exercise and attend follow-up sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiculopathy or neurological deficits
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Red flags (cancer, fracture, infection)
  • Pregnancy
  • Cardiopulmonary disease limiting exercise

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: McGill core stabilization group
mcgill core stability exercises has three exercise of mcgill (curl-up, side plank, bird dog) done in order to must maintain a neutral spine while using controlled, painless motions to engage the deep stabilizing muscles.

To conduct mcgill core stability exercises, three exercise of mcgill (curl-up, side plank, bird dog) done in order to must maintain a neutral spine while using controlled, painless motions to engage the deep stabilizing muscles.

To perform a curl-up, lie on back with one knee bent, position hands under lower back, softly brace midsection, and lift just head and shoulder blades for a short hold without bending your spine.To perform the side plank, lie on side with elbow underneath shoulder, brace core and lift your hips into a straight line from head to toe. You must keep up this position without permitting trunk to droop. the bird dog, which requires kneeling on hands and knees, bracing the core and carefully extending one arm and opposite leg while maintaining a stable trunk and level back for a brief hold before switching to the other side. Exercises done with slowly, focus on stability rather than range of motion or exercises done 10 reputation with 10 second hold

Comparador Ativo: Sahrmann core control Protocol Group
Participants perform 5 different levels of sahrmann core control protocol patient exercises, including heel slide, single leg lift, alternate leg lift, alternate leg extension during e session and double leg lowering which are a progressive series of core stability exercises.
The exercises are performed in stages, from simple movements to more complicated ones, including leg lifts, single-leg extensions and double-leg lowers. The main point, at all levels, is maintaining the pelvis. One commonality through all levels is maintaining a neutral lower back no arching, no tilting, no rib flaring. This progression of movement is used to help the core learn how to stabilize the spine during functional tasks to enhance lumbopelvic stability, motor control, and promote proper movement patterns while reducing low back pain. The exercise lasted for ten seconds in the final position of the level. Each of the five levels was separated by a 1 minute break interval

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Numeric pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Prazo: baseline week 0 and 6-week
For pain intensity numeric rating pain scale will be used The NPRS asks the patient to rate their pain on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild pain 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe pain Patients choose a number that best describes their present pain, average pain, or worst pain
baseline week 0 and 6-week
OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
Prazo: baseline week 0 and week6

Osvestry disability index scale use for NSLBP. The ODI contains 10 sections, each assessing a different functional area, degree of pain, Personal care (washing/dressing), Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Social life, Traveling

Each section is scored 0-5, where:

0 = No disability 5 = Maximum disability The patient selects one statement per section that best describes their condition

baseline week 0 and week6

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

  • Akodu A, Tella B and Olujobi O (2015) Effect of stabilization exercise on pain and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. African Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences 7(1): 7-11. Alqhtani RS, Ahmed H, Ghulam et al.(2024) Efficacy of core-strengthening and intensive dynamic back exercises on pain core muscle endurance and functional disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain A randomized comparative study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 13(2): 475-489 Ammar TA (2019) McGill exercises versus conventional exercises in chronic low back pain. Life Science Journal 9(5): 393-397. Baghani P, Naserpour N and Piri H (2023) Supervised group exercise therapy versus home based exercise therapy: the effect of mcgill exercises on pain, disability and trunk stability in middle-aged women with non-specific chronic low back pain. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal 13(2): 127-134. Chakraborty J, Kumar P and Sarkar B (2019) Comparative study of motor control exercises and global core stabilization exercises on pain, rom and function in subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 9(8): 116-123. Chan E, Nadzalan A, Othman Z et al. (2020) The short-term effects of progressive vs conventional core stability exercise in rehabilitation of nonspecific chronic low back pain. Sains Malays 49(10): 2527-37. Chiarotto A and Koes BW (2022) Nonspecific low back pain. New England Journal of Medicine 38(6): 1732-1740. Childs JD, Piva SR and Fritz JM (2020) Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine Rehab Journal 30(11): 1331-1334. Eroglu S and Karatas G (2021) The effect of low back pain on quality of life and anxiety levels in women. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi 7(1): 212-219. Fatoye F, Gebrye T and Odeyemi I (2019) Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

24 de abril de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Real)

7 de julho de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

7 de agosto de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

15 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

15 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

20 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

20 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

15 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2024-MS-PT-019

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever