Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback (HUMLA)
2026年9月4日 更新者：Anneli Peolsson、Linkoeping University
Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback: Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Assistant nurses often develop work-related pain in the back, neck and shoulders because their work involves frequent patient handling and movement. Training in safe patient handling may help reduce pain and injury risk, and biofeedback may further support better work techniques during everyday care work.
This study will test whether workplace-based training in patient handling can reduce musculoskeletal problems among assistant nurses. It will also examine whether adding six weeks of self-managed biofeedback-supported work technique training gives extra benefits compared with patient handling training alone. The study will include 60 assistant nurses with musculoskeletal symptoms, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two training groups. Data will be collected through interviews, physical assessments, questionnaires at baseline, six weeks and six months, and weekly SMS monitoring. Interviews with assistant nurses and managers will also explore how the intervention works in practice, how safe patient handling can be promoted, and what organisational factors support safer working methods.
調査の概要
状態
まだ募集していません
条件
詳細な説明
Introduction: Assistant nurses (AN) are at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) affecting the back and neck/shoulder region. Patient handling and movement (PHM) competence and safe working methods may reduce symptoms and injury risk. Biofeedback may further support the acquisition of more sustainable work techniques. However, early workplace-based interventions using biofeedback during ordinary care work remain insufficiently explored. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether early workplace-based interventions focused on PHM competence can reduce WMSD among AN. Another aim is to examine whether self-administered work technique training supported by biofeedback provides additional benefits beyond PHM competence training alone. Furthermore, we aim to explore managers' experiences of promoting workplace safety within nursing assistants' caregiving practice.
Methods and analysis: This is a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, two-arm randomised controlled trial in which 60 AN with WMSD will be included. After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomised to PHM training alone or PHM training plus six weeks of self-administered biofeedback-supported work technique training. Data will be collected through clinical interviews, functional screening, and physical measures. Questionnaires will be completed at baseline, six weeks and six months. Weekly SMS-based monitoring will be conducted throughout the intervention period. Semi-structured interviews with AN and managers will explore experiences of the intervention, feasibility, implementation and organisational conditions for safe PHM. Quantitative data will be analysed using parametric or non-parametric methods, as appropriate, and interview data using inductive qualitative content analysis.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2027-4422-01). All participants will provide written informed consent before participation. Data will be handled confidentially, stored securely and reported in non-identifiable form in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the General Data Protection Regulation. Findings will be disseminated to healthcare, stakeholders, and students, and through scientific publications and presentations.
Following participant approval, managers will receive an information letter describing the study and its requirements. Because participation will take place during working hours, approval from the participant's immediate manager is required. Managers of participating AN will also be invited to participate after providing written informed consent; the number of managers is not predetermined, as more than one nursing assistant may be recruited from each workplace.
Each participant's manager will be provided with information regarding the study design and will receive educational material focused on ergonomics and PHM competence. Both participants and their managers will have access to project support and may contact the research team with questions throughout the study period.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (推定)
60
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究連絡先
- 名前：Anneli Peolsson, Professor, PhD
- 電話番号：+4613284601
- メール：anneli.peolsson@liu.se
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前：Charlotte Wåhlin, Assoc. Prof., PhD
- 電話番号：+46722396640
- メール：Charlotte.Wahlin@liu.se
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
説明
Inclusion criteria:
- Female assistant nurses (AN)
- Employed in/ work in hospital inpatient care or residential care settings
- Employment in south-east Sweden within the counties of Östergötland and Jönköping
- Have at least one year of work experience as AN
- Permanent employmentReport musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck/shoulder region and/or back;
- Have average pain intensity of at least 3/10 on the NRS during the preceding week
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently on sick leave;
- Are receiving other ongoing treatment for their musculoskeletal condition
- Have a disorder considered unrelated to their work
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Group A. Patient handling and movement training
Participants in both Groups A and B will during the first weeks receive a digital educational programme comprising modules delivered through educational platform of the county council of Östergötland. In addition, participants will receive a five-step checklist describing safe PHM, based on Safe Patient Handling - A Research-Based Guide for an Improved Work Environment. The educational content emphasises theoretical and practical training in PHM competence, including the importance of conducting risk assessments and evaluating risks associated with each patient transfer and other physically demanding work tasks. Participants will also receive practical instruction in PHM techniques within their own workplace. |
Both groups: Participants in Groups A and B will receive individualised ergonomic advice tailored to their work situation and needs.
During the first weeks, they will complete a digital educational programme delivered through the county council of Östergötland's educational platform and receive a five-step checklist for safe patient handling and movement (PHM), based on Safe Patient Handling - A Research-Based Guide for an Improved Work Environment.
The programme includes theoretical and practical PHM training, with emphasis on risk assessment, safe patient transfers and other physically demanding work tasks.
Practical instruction will also be provided in the participants' own workplaces.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Group B. Patient handling and movement training plus biofeedback
Group B. As described above plus Biofeedback-supported work technique training.
Participants in Group B will receive six weeks of self-administered biofeedback-supported work technique training in addition to PHM training.
The system uses inertial measurement unit sensors attached to the trunk and upper arm to monitor back and arm postures during routine work activities, with particular focus on the neck/shoulder region and back (34, 35) (Figure 2).
When unfavourable postures are detected, participants receive gentle vibratory feedback, increasing with less favourable postures and stopping when more ergonomic postures are adopted.
After instruction and practical training, participants will use the system independently during ordinary work tasks to develop more ergonomic and less physically demanding techniques.
The minimum dose is 10 sessions of at least 20 minutes over six weeks, although participants may complete longer or additional sessions if they wish.
|
Biofeedback-supported work technique training (Group B): Participants in Group B will additionally receive six weeks of self-administered work technique training supported by biofeedback (Wergonic AB, Tullinge, Sweden).
Wearable inertial measurement unit sensors attached to the trunk and upper arm will monitor working postures during routine care work, particularly movements involving the back and neck/shoulder region (34, 35) (Figure 2).
When unfavourable postures are detected, the system provides gentle vibrotactile feedback, which increases with less favourable postures and stops when a more ergonomic posture is adopted.
After instruction, participants will use the system independently during normal work to practise less physically demanding work techniques.
They will complete at least ten sessions of a minimum of 20 minutes over six weeks, with the option to train more frequently or for longer periods.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
時間枠：Baseline, 6-week, 6-month
|
Pain: Overall work-related musculoskeletal disorders current pain intensity in the back/neck/shoulder will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
One score for the whole area.
|
Baseline, 6-week, 6-month
|
|
Work technique
時間枠：During the intervention period, every week from baseline to six months follow-up.
|
Participating AN will receive a weekly SMS question: "How well has your work technique functioned this week in relation to safe patient handling and movement?
(0 = not at all well; 10 = very well)."
|
During the intervention period, every week from baseline to six months follow-up.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Health related quality of life
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L Swedish version (permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167).
The instrument consists of five questions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression (1 = no problem; 5= unable to extreme problems).
The health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions to an index score (0.31 = the worst to 1 = the best) health state.
This is one instrument, the results of the instrument is presented as an index score only according to the EQ manual and as commonly used.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
EQ-VAS
時間枠：Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 month
|
EQ-VAS (vertical thermometer) (0 = the worst health you can imagine; 100 = the best health you can imagine).
(Permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167.)
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 month
|
|
Neck Disability Index
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The impact of neck pain on daily life will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (percentage from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater neck-related disability).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
QuickDASH-7
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Upper limb function will be assessed using the modified QuickDASH-7 (0 = no disability; 100 = most severe disability)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Functional limitations related to low back pain will be assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire version 2.1 (percentage from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater low-back-related disability).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Work ability
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Work ability will be assessed using Question 1 of the Work Ability Index (WAI) (0 = completely unable to work; 10 = work ability at its lifetime best).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Multidisciplinary Work Evaluation Tool
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Problems related to the physically, environmentally and psychosocially demanding aspects of the work environment will be assessed using the Structured Multidisciplinary Work Evaluation Tool (SMET) rated on a 10-point scale (1-11).
Responses will be trichotomized into scores 1-3 = "a low degree of problems," 4-7 = "a moderate degree of problems," and 8-10 = "a high degree of problems."
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Stress
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Perceived stress will be assessed using a single-item question: "Have you felt stressed recently?"
(1 = not at all; 5 = very much)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Perceived exertion
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Perceived physical exertion at work will be assessed using the Borg Category Ratio Scale (0 = no exertion at all; 10 = extremely strong or maximal exertion) (CR-10) and will also be applied in relation to patient transfers, as reported in previous research
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Patient transfers
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The number of patient transfers performed during a typical working day will be assessed using the Number of Daily Patient Transfers measure (higher values = more patient transfers performed per day, with no fixed highest value)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Productivity
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Experiences of work environment-related problems that have affected health, work performance, or sickness presence (presenteeism) during the preceding seven days will be assessed on a 0-10 scale (higher scores indicate greater negative impact).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Psychosocial safety climate
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Psychosocial safety climate will be assessed using the four-item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (4-20 scale, higher categories indicating higher level of safety climate).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Physical activity
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Two questions concerning physical activity (1 = 0 minutes to 6 > 300 minutes) and exercise (1 = 0 minutes to 6 > 120 minutes) will be used, with higher categories indicating a higher level of physical activity.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Need for recovery
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The need for recovery will be measured using the short version of the Need for Recovery Scale, consisting of three items (0-3 scale, higher scores indicate a greater need for recovery).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Participants will identify work-related activities that they find difficult to perform and rate the importance of these activities at baseline, six weeks and six months follow-up using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) (0 = unable to perform the activity at all; 10 = able to perform)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Expectations and goal setting
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
During the assessment, participants will be asked to rate their expectations regarding participation in the study, particularly in relation to increasing their knowledge of OSH, ergonomics and PHM competence.
Participants will also formulate individual goals, describing what they wish to achieve through participation and identifying factors that may facilitate or hinder goal attainment.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Pain intensity last week
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Description: Pain intensity: Overall work-related musculoskeletal disorders pain intensity in the back/neck/shoulder area during the last week will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain). One score only for the whole area. Time Frame: Baseline, 6-week, 6-month |
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Neck pain intensity
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current neck pain intensity on the NRS Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Current low back pain intensity
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current low back pain intensity (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Current shoulder pain intensity
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current shoulder pain intensity (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Background data, age
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Year of birth (open-ended response)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, IAM
時間枠：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcomes will be assessed at 6-week and 6-month follow-up using Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Evaluation of biofeedback training
時間枠：6 week, 6 month
|
Evaluation of biofeedback training (Group B only) at 6-week and 6-month follow-up: Participants will complete two six-item questionnaires on vibrotactile biofeedback.
The first assesses usefulness, comfort and motivation, based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, and whether repeated use improves interpretation of vibration signals and work technique.
Scores are reported as mean values (1-7) or summed scores (6-43), with higher scores indicating more positive experiences.
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Background data from the unit manager, number of employees
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the number of employees
|
Baseline
|
|
Interviews with AN
時間枠：6 week
|
Interviews with AN: To explore participants' experiences of the intervention at the six-week follow-up, semi-structured individual interviews (preferable physical meeting) will be conducted with a sample from both Group A and Group B (n ≈ 15).
The interviews will explore participants' experiences of work tasks, the working conditions and safety culture in relation to nursing care and safe PHM.
They will address perceived challenges, support from colleagues and managers, staff and patient safety during transfers, access to assistive devices, and experiences of implementing new work practices.
The interviews will also examine participants' perceptions of the theoretical and practical training, the usefulness of the intervention in daily work, the role of biofeedback where applicable, and opportunities for sustaining and extending safe PHM practices within the workplace or organisation.
|
6 week
|
|
Interviews with managers
時間枠：6 week
|
Interviews with managers: Following completion of the intervention at the six-week follow-up, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of managers whose AN participated in the study, with the aim of exploring their experiences of the project.
Approximately 10 managers will be recruited.
The manager interviews will explore managers' experiences of organisational conditions for safe PHM, including their role in systematic OSH management, safety culture, risk assessment, staff and patient safety, access to assistive devices, and organisational support.
The interviews will also address managers' perceptions of the intervention, its implementation in daily nursing care, the use of biofeedback where applicable, and opportunities for sustaining and scaling safe PHM practices within the workplace or organisation.
|
6 week
|
|
ICD-10
時間枠：Baseline
|
Diagnostic classification will be performed according to ICD-10 criteria, based on the clinical interview and functional assessment.
A physiotherapist will conduct a clinical interview regarding AN's musculoskeletal symptoms affecting the neck/shoulder region and/or back in relation to their occupational activities.
Clinical functional assessment at baseline (Week 1) will include screening of mobility and musculoskeletal function using the methodology "Medical Surveillance for Ergonomically Demanding Work (MEBA)".
|
Baseline
|
|
Screening for psychosoicial risk-factors associated with pain
時間枠：Baseline
|
Screening for psychosocial risk factors associated with the development of persistent pain and long-term disability will be performed using the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire
|
Baseline
|
|
Technical evaluation of biofeedback training (Group B only)
時間枠：Baseline and 6 week
|
Training frequency and duration will be documented in a training diary.
A technical evaluation will be conducted to enable pre-post comparisons at baseline and 6-weeks follow-up.
Assessments will be performed during three standardised and commonly occurring work tasks: bed making with the patient in bed, repositioning a patient higher up in bed, and transferring a patient from bed to a wheelchair.
The evaluation will be based on the distribution of body segment angles, angular velocities, and the amount of vibration feedback received during task performance.
|
Baseline and 6 week
|
|
Background data, duration of employement
時間枠：baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Duration of employment (0-2 years, 2-5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years)
|
baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Background data, employement status
時間枠：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Full-time/part-time employment status (%).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, IAM
時間枠：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcome will be assessed at 6-week and 6-month follow-up using Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, FIM
時間枠：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcome will be assessed using Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Unit manager, age distribution of employees
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the age distribution
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, gender distrbution of employees
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed including gender distribution
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, current sickness absence of employees
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the current sickness absence rates
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, patient groups cared for
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the patient groups cared for.
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, availability of work equipment
時間枠：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the availability of work equipment.
|
Baseline
|
|
Continued training using biofeedback , group B only
時間枠：6 week
|
Comfort, technology acceptance and motivation for continued training will be rated on a seven-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more positive experiences.
|
6 week
|
|
Evaluation of e-learning, open question
時間枠：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
What conditions do you consider existing at your workplace for applying the knowledge gained from the training?
(facilitating and barriers).
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：Immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning modulel, at latest after 6-week
|
My prior knowledge was sufficient to enable me to benefit from the training (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
Immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning modulel, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
During the training, I acquired valuable knowledge (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
The duration of the training was appropriate, in terms of the number of minutes (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：ill be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
I will be able to apply what I have learned in my work (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
ill be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
The content was relevant to my work (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, as latest after 6 week
|
The training was of high quality (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, as latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
時間枠：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
I would recommend the training to others (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning, open question
時間枠：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
Did you miss any component during the training?
If yes, please specify
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
協力者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Anneli Peolsson, Prof., PhD、1. Dep. of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, and 2. Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine Centre, Dep. of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Clinical Medicine, Linköping Univiversity, Sweden
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Wahlin C, Stigmar K, Nilsing Strid E. A systematic review of work interventions to promote safe patient handling and movement in the healthcare sector. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2520-2532. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2007660. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
- Lind CM. A Rapid Review on the Effectiveness and Use of Wearable Biofeedback Motion Capture Systems in Ergonomics to Mitigate Adverse Postures and Movements of the Upper Body. Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 23;24(11):3345. doi: 10.3390/s24113345.
- Kugler HL, Taylor NF, Brusco NK. Patient handling training interventions and musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e24937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24937. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
- Lu L, Ko YM, Chen HY, Chueh JW, Chen PY, Cooper CL. Patient Safety and Staff Well-Being: Organizational Culture as a Resource. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063722.
- Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Hundt AS, Hoonakker P, Holden R, Gurses AP. Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
- Agency for Work Environment Expertise. Safe patient handling - A research based guide for a better working environment.; 2022 Swedish Report No.: 978-91-987762-7-0. 2024 English report No.:978-91-89747-61-6.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
2027年1月18日
一次修了 (推定)
2028年12月31日
研究の完了 (推定)
2028年12月31日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2026年8月27日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2026年9月1日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2026年9月4日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2026年9月10日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2026年9月4日
最終確認日
2026年9月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- Linkoeping U
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
未定
IPD プランの説明
De-identified data may be made available from the PI on reasonable request, subject to ethical and legal restrictions.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。