Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback (HUMLA)
2026年9月4日 更新者：Anneli Peolsson、Linkoeping University
Reducing Physical Workload Among Assistant Nurses Through Ergonomic Work Technique Training With or Without Biofeedback: Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Assistant nurses often develop work-related pain in the back, neck and shoulders because their work involves frequent patient handling and movement. Training in safe patient handling may help reduce pain and injury risk, and biofeedback may further support better work techniques during everyday care work.
This study will test whether workplace-based training in patient handling can reduce musculoskeletal problems among assistant nurses. It will also examine whether adding six weeks of self-managed biofeedback-supported work technique training gives extra benefits compared with patient handling training alone. The study will include 60 assistant nurses with musculoskeletal symptoms, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two training groups. Data will be collected through interviews, physical assessments, questionnaires at baseline, six weeks and six months, and weekly SMS monitoring. Interviews with assistant nurses and managers will also explore how the intervention works in practice, how safe patient handling can be promoted, and what organisational factors support safer working methods.
研究概览
地位
尚未招聘
条件
详细说明
Introduction: Assistant nurses (AN) are at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) affecting the back and neck/shoulder region. Patient handling and movement (PHM) competence and safe working methods may reduce symptoms and injury risk. Biofeedback may further support the acquisition of more sustainable work techniques. However, early workplace-based interventions using biofeedback during ordinary care work remain insufficiently explored. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether early workplace-based interventions focused on PHM competence can reduce WMSD among AN. Another aim is to examine whether self-administered work technique training supported by biofeedback provides additional benefits beyond PHM competence training alone. Furthermore, we aim to explore managers' experiences of promoting workplace safety within nursing assistants' caregiving practice.
Methods and analysis: This is a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal, two-arm randomised controlled trial in which 60 AN with WMSD will be included. After providing written informed consent, participants will be randomised to PHM training alone or PHM training plus six weeks of self-administered biofeedback-supported work technique training. Data will be collected through clinical interviews, functional screening, and physical measures. Questionnaires will be completed at baseline, six weeks and six months. Weekly SMS-based monitoring will be conducted throughout the intervention period. Semi-structured interviews with AN and managers will explore experiences of the intervention, feasibility, implementation and organisational conditions for safe PHM. Quantitative data will be analysed using parametric or non-parametric methods, as appropriate, and interview data using inductive qualitative content analysis.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2027-4422-01). All participants will provide written informed consent before participation. Data will be handled confidentially, stored securely and reported in non-identifiable form in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the General Data Protection Regulation. Findings will be disseminated to healthcare, stakeholders, and students, and through scientific publications and presentations.
Following participant approval, managers will receive an information letter describing the study and its requirements. Because participation will take place during working hours, approval from the participant's immediate manager is required. Managers of participating AN will also be invited to participate after providing written informed consent; the number of managers is not predetermined, as more than one nursing assistant may be recruited from each workplace.
Each participant's manager will be provided with information regarding the study design and will receive educational material focused on ergonomics and PHM competence. Both participants and their managers will have access to project support and may contact the research team with questions throughout the study period.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
60
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Anneli Peolsson, Professor, PhD
- 电话号码：+4613284601
- 邮箱：anneli.peolsson@liu.se
研究联系人备份
- 姓名：Charlotte Wåhlin, Assoc. Prof., PhD
- 电话号码：+46722396640
- 邮箱：Charlotte.Wahlin@liu.se
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
不
描述
Inclusion criteria:
- Female assistant nurses (AN)
- Employed in/ work in hospital inpatient care or residential care settings
- Employment in south-east Sweden within the counties of Östergötland and Jönköping
- Have at least one year of work experience as AN
- Permanent employmentReport musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck/shoulder region and/or back;
- Have average pain intensity of at least 3/10 on the NRS during the preceding week
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently on sick leave;
- Are receiving other ongoing treatment for their musculoskeletal condition
- Have a disorder considered unrelated to their work
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：Group A. Patient handling and movement training
Participants in both Groups A and B will during the first weeks receive a digital educational programme comprising modules delivered through educational platform of the county council of Östergötland. In addition, participants will receive a five-step checklist describing safe PHM, based on Safe Patient Handling - A Research-Based Guide for an Improved Work Environment. The educational content emphasises theoretical and practical training in PHM competence, including the importance of conducting risk assessments and evaluating risks associated with each patient transfer and other physically demanding work tasks. Participants will also receive practical instruction in PHM techniques within their own workplace. |
Both groups: Participants in Groups A and B will receive individualised ergonomic advice tailored to their work situation and needs.
During the first weeks, they will complete a digital educational programme delivered through the county council of Östergötland's educational platform and receive a five-step checklist for safe patient handling and movement (PHM), based on Safe Patient Handling - A Research-Based Guide for an Improved Work Environment.
The programme includes theoretical and practical PHM training, with emphasis on risk assessment, safe patient transfers and other physically demanding work tasks.
Practical instruction will also be provided in the participants' own workplaces.
|
|
有源比较器：Group B. Patient handling and movement training plus biofeedback
Group B. As described above plus Biofeedback-supported work technique training.
Participants in Group B will receive six weeks of self-administered biofeedback-supported work technique training in addition to PHM training.
The system uses inertial measurement unit sensors attached to the trunk and upper arm to monitor back and arm postures during routine work activities, with particular focus on the neck/shoulder region and back (34, 35) (Figure 2).
When unfavourable postures are detected, participants receive gentle vibratory feedback, increasing with less favourable postures and stopping when more ergonomic postures are adopted.
After instruction and practical training, participants will use the system independently during ordinary work tasks to develop more ergonomic and less physically demanding techniques.
The minimum dose is 10 sessions of at least 20 minutes over six weeks, although participants may complete longer or additional sessions if they wish.
|
Biofeedback-supported work technique training (Group B): Participants in Group B will additionally receive six weeks of self-administered work technique training supported by biofeedback (Wergonic AB, Tullinge, Sweden).
Wearable inertial measurement unit sensors attached to the trunk and upper arm will monitor working postures during routine care work, particularly movements involving the back and neck/shoulder region (34, 35) (Figure 2).
When unfavourable postures are detected, the system provides gentle vibrotactile feedback, which increases with less favourable postures and stops when a more ergonomic posture is adopted.
After instruction, participants will use the system independently during normal work to practise less physically demanding work techniques.
They will complete at least ten sessions of a minimum of 20 minutes over six weeks, with the option to train more frequently or for longer periods.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
大体时间：Baseline, 6-week, 6-month
|
Pain: Overall work-related musculoskeletal disorders current pain intensity in the back/neck/shoulder will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
One score for the whole area.
|
Baseline, 6-week, 6-month
|
|
Work technique
大体时间：During the intervention period, every week from baseline to six months follow-up.
|
Participating AN will receive a weekly SMS question: "How well has your work technique functioned this week in relation to safe patient handling and movement?
(0 = not at all well; 10 = very well)."
|
During the intervention period, every week from baseline to six months follow-up.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Health related quality of life
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L Swedish version (permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167).
The instrument consists of five questions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression (1 = no problem; 5= unable to extreme problems).
The health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions to an index score (0.31 = the worst to 1 = the best) health state.
This is one instrument, the results of the instrument is presented as an index score only according to the EQ manual and as commonly used.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
EQ-VAS
大体时间：Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 month
|
EQ-VAS (vertical thermometer) (0 = the worst health you can imagine; 100 = the best health you can imagine).
(Permission to be used Aug. 18, 2026, tracking number 87167.)
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 month
|
|
Neck Disability Index
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The impact of neck pain on daily life will be evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (percentage from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater neck-related disability).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
QuickDASH-7
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Upper limb function will be assessed using the modified QuickDASH-7 (0 = no disability; 100 = most severe disability)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Functional limitations related to low back pain will be assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire version 2.1 (percentage from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating greater low-back-related disability).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Work ability
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Work ability will be assessed using Question 1 of the Work Ability Index (WAI) (0 = completely unable to work; 10 = work ability at its lifetime best).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Multidisciplinary Work Evaluation Tool
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Problems related to the physically, environmentally and psychosocially demanding aspects of the work environment will be assessed using the Structured Multidisciplinary Work Evaluation Tool (SMET) rated on a 10-point scale (1-11).
Responses will be trichotomized into scores 1-3 = "a low degree of problems," 4-7 = "a moderate degree of problems," and 8-10 = "a high degree of problems."
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Stress
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Perceived stress will be assessed using a single-item question: "Have you felt stressed recently?"
(1 = not at all; 5 = very much)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Perceived exertion
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Perceived physical exertion at work will be assessed using the Borg Category Ratio Scale (0 = no exertion at all; 10 = extremely strong or maximal exertion) (CR-10) and will also be applied in relation to patient transfers, as reported in previous research
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Patient transfers
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The number of patient transfers performed during a typical working day will be assessed using the Number of Daily Patient Transfers measure (higher values = more patient transfers performed per day, with no fixed highest value)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Productivity
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Experiences of work environment-related problems that have affected health, work performance, or sickness presence (presenteeism) during the preceding seven days will be assessed on a 0-10 scale (higher scores indicate greater negative impact).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Psychosocial safety climate
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Psychosocial safety climate will be assessed using the four-item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (4-20 scale, higher categories indicating higher level of safety climate).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Physical activity
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Two questions concerning physical activity (1 = 0 minutes to 6 > 300 minutes) and exercise (1 = 0 minutes to 6 > 120 minutes) will be used, with higher categories indicating a higher level of physical activity.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Need for recovery
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
The need for recovery will be measured using the short version of the Need for Recovery Scale, consisting of three items (0-3 scale, higher scores indicate a greater need for recovery).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Participants will identify work-related activities that they find difficult to perform and rate the importance of these activities at baseline, six weeks and six months follow-up using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) (0 = unable to perform the activity at all; 10 = able to perform)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Expectations and goal setting
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
During the assessment, participants will be asked to rate their expectations regarding participation in the study, particularly in relation to increasing their knowledge of OSH, ergonomics and PHM competence.
Participants will also formulate individual goals, describing what they wish to achieve through participation and identifying factors that may facilitate or hinder goal attainment.
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Pain intensity last week
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Description: Pain intensity: Overall work-related musculoskeletal disorders pain intensity in the back/neck/shoulder area during the last week will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain). One score only for the whole area. Time Frame: Baseline, 6-week, 6-month |
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Neck pain intensity
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current neck pain intensity on the NRS Scale (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Current low back pain intensity
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current low back pain intensity (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Current shoulder pain intensity
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Current shoulder pain intensity (NRS 0-10, higher levels indicate more severe pain).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Background data, age
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Year of birth (open-ended response)
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, IAM
大体时间：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcomes will be assessed at 6-week and 6-month follow-up using Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Evaluation of biofeedback training
大体时间：6 week, 6 month
|
Evaluation of biofeedback training (Group B only) at 6-week and 6-month follow-up: Participants will complete two six-item questionnaires on vibrotactile biofeedback.
The first assesses usefulness, comfort and motivation, based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, and whether repeated use improves interpretation of vibration signals and work technique.
Scores are reported as mean values (1-7) or summed scores (6-43), with higher scores indicating more positive experiences.
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Background data from the unit manager, number of employees
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the number of employees
|
Baseline
|
|
Interviews with AN
大体时间：6 week
|
Interviews with AN: To explore participants' experiences of the intervention at the six-week follow-up, semi-structured individual interviews (preferable physical meeting) will be conducted with a sample from both Group A and Group B (n ≈ 15).
The interviews will explore participants' experiences of work tasks, the working conditions and safety culture in relation to nursing care and safe PHM.
They will address perceived challenges, support from colleagues and managers, staff and patient safety during transfers, access to assistive devices, and experiences of implementing new work practices.
The interviews will also examine participants' perceptions of the theoretical and practical training, the usefulness of the intervention in daily work, the role of biofeedback where applicable, and opportunities for sustaining and extending safe PHM practices within the workplace or organisation.
|
6 week
|
|
Interviews with managers
大体时间：6 week
|
Interviews with managers: Following completion of the intervention at the six-week follow-up, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a purposive sample of managers whose AN participated in the study, with the aim of exploring their experiences of the project.
Approximately 10 managers will be recruited.
The manager interviews will explore managers' experiences of organisational conditions for safe PHM, including their role in systematic OSH management, safety culture, risk assessment, staff and patient safety, access to assistive devices, and organisational support.
The interviews will also address managers' perceptions of the intervention, its implementation in daily nursing care, the use of biofeedback where applicable, and opportunities for sustaining and scaling safe PHM practices within the workplace or organisation.
|
6 week
|
|
ICD-10
大体时间：Baseline
|
Diagnostic classification will be performed according to ICD-10 criteria, based on the clinical interview and functional assessment.
A physiotherapist will conduct a clinical interview regarding AN's musculoskeletal symptoms affecting the neck/shoulder region and/or back in relation to their occupational activities.
Clinical functional assessment at baseline (Week 1) will include screening of mobility and musculoskeletal function using the methodology "Medical Surveillance for Ergonomically Demanding Work (MEBA)".
|
Baseline
|
|
Screening for psychosoicial risk-factors associated with pain
大体时间：Baseline
|
Screening for psychosocial risk factors associated with the development of persistent pain and long-term disability will be performed using the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire
|
Baseline
|
|
Technical evaluation of biofeedback training (Group B only)
大体时间：Baseline and 6 week
|
Training frequency and duration will be documented in a training diary.
A technical evaluation will be conducted to enable pre-post comparisons at baseline and 6-weeks follow-up.
Assessments will be performed during three standardised and commonly occurring work tasks: bed making with the patient in bed, repositioning a patient higher up in bed, and transferring a patient from bed to a wheelchair.
The evaluation will be based on the distribution of body segment angles, angular velocities, and the amount of vibration feedback received during task performance.
|
Baseline and 6 week
|
|
Background data, duration of employement
大体时间：baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Duration of employment (0-2 years, 2-5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years)
|
baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Background data, employement status
大体时间：Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
Full-time/part-time employment status (%).
|
Baseline, 6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, IAM
大体时间：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcome will be assessed at 6-week and 6-month follow-up using Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Implementation outcome, FIM
大体时间：6 week, 6 month
|
Implementation outcome will be assessed using Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).
The questionnaire comprise four items, answered on 5-point Likert-type scales: (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
|
6 week, 6 month
|
|
Unit manager, age distribution of employees
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the age distribution
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, gender distrbution of employees
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed including gender distribution
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, current sickness absence of employees
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the current sickness absence rates
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, patient groups cared for
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the patient groups cared for.
|
Baseline
|
|
Unit manager, availability of work equipment
大体时间：Baseline
|
At baseline unit managers provide information on the healthcare service unit in which the participating AN is employed, including the availability of work equipment.
|
Baseline
|
|
Continued training using biofeedback , group B only
大体时间：6 week
|
Comfort, technology acceptance and motivation for continued training will be rated on a seven-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more positive experiences.
|
6 week
|
|
Evaluation of e-learning, open question
大体时间：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
What conditions do you consider existing at your workplace for applying the knowledge gained from the training?
(facilitating and barriers).
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：Immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning modulel, at latest after 6-week
|
My prior knowledge was sufficient to enable me to benefit from the training (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
Immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning modulel, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
During the training, I acquired valuable knowledge (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
The duration of the training was appropriate, in terms of the number of minutes (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：ill be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
I will be able to apply what I have learned in my work (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
ill be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
The content was relevant to my work (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6-week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, as latest after 6 week
|
The training was of high quality (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, as latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning
大体时间：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
I would recommend the training to others (1=to a very small extent, 5= to a very large extent)
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
|
E-learning, open question
大体时间：Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
Did you miss any component during the training?
If yes, please specify
|
Will be completed immediately after participants have undertaken the theoretical e-learning module, at latest after 6 week
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Anneli Peolsson, Prof., PhD、1. Dep. of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, and 2. Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine Centre, Dep. of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Clinical Medicine, Linköping Univiversity, Sweden
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Wahlin C, Stigmar K, Nilsing Strid E. A systematic review of work interventions to promote safe patient handling and movement in the healthcare sector. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2520-2532. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2007660. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
- Lind CM. A Rapid Review on the Effectiveness and Use of Wearable Biofeedback Motion Capture Systems in Ergonomics to Mitigate Adverse Postures and Movements of the Upper Body. Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 23;24(11):3345. doi: 10.3390/s24113345.
- Kugler HL, Taylor NF, Brusco NK. Patient handling training interventions and musculoskeletal injuries in healthcare workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e24937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24937. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
- Lu L, Ko YM, Chen HY, Chueh JW, Chen PY, Cooper CL. Patient Safety and Staff Well-Being: Organizational Culture as a Resource. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063722.
- Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Hundt AS, Hoonakker P, Holden R, Gurses AP. Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety. Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
- Agency for Work Environment Expertise. Safe patient handling - A research based guide for a better working environment.; 2022 Swedish Report No.: 978-91-987762-7-0. 2024 English report No.:978-91-89747-61-6.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
2027年1月18日
初级完成 (估计的)
2028年12月31日
研究完成 (估计的)
2028年12月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年8月27日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年9月1日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年9月4日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年9月10日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年9月4日
最后验证
2026年9月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- Linkoeping U
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
未定
IPD 计划说明
De-identified data may be made available from the PI on reasonable request, subject to ethical and legal restrictions.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.