このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Phase-Locked Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression

2026年11月4日 更新者:Wei-Chung Mao、Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

Development of Precision Medicine in the Field of iTBS on Patients With TRD Using Multimodal Functional Brain Imaging and Deep Learning

This study aims to investigate whether synchronizing accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) with an individual's ongoing brain activity improves treatment outcomes in adults with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD).

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups:

  1. Phase-locked aiTBS (PL-aiTBS): Magnetic stimulation was synchronized with a specific phase of ongoing brain activity measured using electroencephalography (EEG).
  2. Random-phase aiTBS (RP-aiTBS): Participants received the same stimulation protocol without synchronization to a specific phase of brain activity.

Both groups received personalized stimulation based on their individual theta frequency. Treatment consisted of 10 sessions over three consecutive days, with three sessions on Day 1, three sessions on Day 2, and four sessions on Day 3 (3-3-4 schedule). Each session delivered 1,800 magnetic pulses, resulting in a total of 18,000 pulses per participant.

The primary objective was to compare changes in depressive symptoms between the two treatment groups. Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline (before the first stimulation session), mid-treatment (after the sixth session, Day 2), post-treatment (after the tenth session, Day 3), and follow-up (Day7).

Resting-state EEG recordings were collected before and after stimulation sessions to investigate treatment-related changes in neural oscillatory activity, phase-amplitude coupling, functional connectivity, and other neurophysiological measures, as well as their potential associations with improvements in depressive symptoms.

調査の概要

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

54

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Taipei City
      • Taipei、Taipei City、台湾、112
        • Cheng Hsin General Hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~70年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 to 70 years.
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD).
  • Inadequate response to at least two antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration.
  • A 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score of 9 or higher.
  • A Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 16 or higher.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other psychiatric disorders or serious medical conditions.
  • Psychotic disorders.
  • Current illicit drug use or alcohol use disorder.
  • Neurological or seizure disorders.
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including cardiac pacemakers or metallic implants.
  • Pregnancy or postpartum depression.
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within the previous 12 months.
  • Unstable medical illness.
  • Inability to comply with study procedures.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:トリプル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Phase-Locked Accelerated iTBS (PL-aiTBS)

Participants received individualized accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) synchronized to a specific phase of ongoing frontal theta oscillations measured using EEG.

Stimulation was delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; F3) using an individualized theta-frequency-based iTBS protocol. Each participant received 10 sessions over three consecutive days (3-3-4 schedule), with 1,800 pulses per session (18,000 pulses total). Stimulation was synchronized to the trough of ongoing frontal theta oscillations using real-time EEG phase estimation.

アクティブコンパレータ:Random-Phase Accelerated iTBS (RP-aiTBS)

Participants received the same individualized aiTBS protocol without phase-locked synchronization to ongoing frontal theta oscillations.

Participants received the same individualized iTBS protocol targeting the left DLPFC (F3), consisting of 10 sessions over three consecutive days (3-3-4 schedule), with 1,800 pulses per session (18,000 pulses total). Stimulation was delivered without phase-locked synchronization to ongoing frontal theta oscillations.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in HAM-D Total Score
時間枠:Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.

Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Change in MADRS Total Score
時間枠:Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.

Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Response Rate Based on HAM-D
時間枠:Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in HAM-D total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Response Rate Based on MADRS
時間枠:Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in MADRS total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Remission Rate Based on HAM-D17
時間枠:Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 total score of 7 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Remission Rate Based on MADRS
時間枠:Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Remission was defined as a MADRS total score of 10 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Spectral Power
時間枠:Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded to assess changes in neural oscillatory activity following accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS). Spectral power was quantified across conventional frequency bands, including delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. Changes in spectral power from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Phase-Amplitude Coupling
時間枠:Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG was analyzed to assess phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), reflecting the relationship between the phase of lower-frequency oscillations and the amplitude of higher-frequency activity. Changes in PAC strength from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to characterize neurophysiological effects of aiTBS.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-State EEG Functional Connectivity
時間枠:Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG functional connectivity was assessed using phase-based synchronization measures between brain regions. Changes in functional connectivity from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to investigate stimulation-related alterations in neural synchronization.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Microstate Parameters
時間枠:Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG microstate analysis was used to characterize changes in the temporal dynamics of large-scale brain network activity. Microstate parameters included mean duration (ms), occurrence rate (events/s), time coverage (%), and transition probabilities between microstate classes. Changes in these parameters were evaluated across treatment sessions to investigate stimulation-related alterations in brain network dynamics.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2024年5月22日

一次修了 (実際)

2026年4月15日

研究の完了 (実際)

2026年4月15日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年11月4日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年11月4日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月10日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月10日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月4日

最終確認日

2026年11月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • (985)111A-63
  • (1126)113A-56 (その他の識別子:Cheng Hsin General Hospital Institutional Review Board)

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to participant confidentiality and privacy considerations. No external IPD sharing is currently planned.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する