이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Phase-Locked Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression

2026년 11월 4일 업데이트: Wei-Chung Mao, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

Development of Precision Medicine in the Field of iTBS on Patients With TRD Using Multimodal Functional Brain Imaging and Deep Learning

This study aims to investigate whether synchronizing accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) with an individual's ongoing brain activity improves treatment outcomes in adults with Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD).

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups:

  1. Phase-locked aiTBS (PL-aiTBS): Magnetic stimulation was synchronized with a specific phase of ongoing brain activity measured using electroencephalography (EEG).
  2. Random-phase aiTBS (RP-aiTBS): Participants received the same stimulation protocol without synchronization to a specific phase of brain activity.

Both groups received personalized stimulation based on their individual theta frequency. Treatment consisted of 10 sessions over three consecutive days, with three sessions on Day 1, three sessions on Day 2, and four sessions on Day 3 (3-3-4 schedule). Each session delivered 1,800 magnetic pulses, resulting in a total of 18,000 pulses per participant.

The primary objective was to compare changes in depressive symptoms between the two treatment groups. Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline (before the first stimulation session), mid-treatment (after the sixth session, Day 2), post-treatment (after the tenth session, Day 3), and follow-up (Day7).

Resting-state EEG recordings were collected before and after stimulation sessions to investigate treatment-related changes in neural oscillatory activity, phase-amplitude coupling, functional connectivity, and other neurophysiological measures, as well as their potential associations with improvements in depressive symptoms.

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

54

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Taipei City
      • Taipei, Taipei City, 대만, 112
        • Cheng Hsin General Hospital

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 to 70 years.
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD).
  • Inadequate response to at least two antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration.
  • A 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score of 9 or higher.
  • A Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 16 or higher.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other psychiatric disorders or serious medical conditions.
  • Psychotic disorders.
  • Current illicit drug use or alcohol use disorder.
  • Neurological or seizure disorders.
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including cardiac pacemakers or metallic implants.
  • Pregnancy or postpartum depression.
  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) within the previous 12 months.
  • Unstable medical illness.
  • Inability to comply with study procedures.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 삼루타

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Phase-Locked Accelerated iTBS (PL-aiTBS)

Participants received individualized accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) synchronized to a specific phase of ongoing frontal theta oscillations measured using EEG.

Stimulation was delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; F3) using an individualized theta-frequency-based iTBS protocol. Each participant received 10 sessions over three consecutive days (3-3-4 schedule), with 1,800 pulses per session (18,000 pulses total). Stimulation was synchronized to the trough of ongoing frontal theta oscillations using real-time EEG phase estimation.

활성 비교기: Random-Phase Accelerated iTBS (RP-aiTBS)

Participants received the same individualized aiTBS protocol without phase-locked synchronization to ongoing frontal theta oscillations.

Participants received the same individualized iTBS protocol targeting the left DLPFC (F3), consisting of 10 sessions over three consecutive days (3-3-4 schedule), with 1,800 pulses per session (18,000 pulses total). Stimulation was delivered without phase-locked synchronization to ongoing frontal theta oscillations.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in HAM-D Total Score
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.

Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Change in MADRS Total Score
기간: Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.

Baseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Response Rate Based on HAM-D
기간: Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in HAM-D total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Response Rate Based on MADRS
기간: Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in MADRS total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Remission Rate Based on HAM-D17
기간: Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 total score of 7 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Remission Rate Based on MADRS
기간: Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

Remission was defined as a MADRS total score of 10 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.

Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Spectral Power
기간: Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded to assess changes in neural oscillatory activity following accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS). Spectral power was quantified across conventional frequency bands, including delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. Changes in spectral power from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Phase-Amplitude Coupling
기간: Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG was analyzed to assess phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), reflecting the relationship between the phase of lower-frequency oscillations and the amplitude of higher-frequency activity. Changes in PAC strength from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to characterize neurophysiological effects of aiTBS.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-State EEG Functional Connectivity
기간: Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG functional connectivity was assessed using phase-based synchronization measures between brain regions. Changes in functional connectivity from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to investigate stimulation-related alterations in neural synchronization.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Change From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Microstate Parameters
기간: Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

Resting-state EEG microstate analysis was used to characterize changes in the temporal dynamics of large-scale brain network activity. Microstate parameters included mean duration (ms), occurrence rate (events/s), time coverage (%), and transition probabilities between microstate classes. Changes in these parameters were evaluated across treatment sessions to investigate stimulation-related alterations in brain network dynamics.

Before and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2024년 5월 22일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 15일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 15일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 11월 4일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 11월 4일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 10일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 10일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 11월 4일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 11월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to participant confidentiality and privacy considerations. No external IPD sharing is currently planned.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다