このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Predicting Transitions From Depression to Wellbeing Through a Network-based Operationalization of Plasticity (PlastNet)

2026年11月6日 更新者:Sara Poletti、IRCCS San Raffaele

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and many patients do not respond adequately to available treatments. Plasticity, the ability of the brain and mind to change, is thought to be a crucial process in the transition from depression to wellbeing, but methods to measure it are limited. The Network Theory of Plasticity proposes that the weaker the connections among the elements of a system (for example, the symptoms of a patient or the regions of the brain), the higher its plasticity. Earlier analyses of large clinical datasets (STAR*D and CO-MED) supported this idea at the population level.

PlastNet is an observational study that aims to validate this approach at the individual level. Two hundred adults (18-70 years) with nonpsychotic MDD recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele will undergo resting-state brain MRI, blood sampling and clinical assessments at baseline, and clinical assessments again after four weeks. No treatment is assigned by the study.

The investigators hypothesize that lower baseline functional connectivity in the brain is associated with a greater reduction in depressive symptoms over four weeks. The study will also investigate whether blood-based multi-omic profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic) can identify biological signatures of plasticity. The results could help clinicians tailor treatments to each patient's level of plasticity.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite available treatments, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond adequately, which highlights the need for approaches that personalize therapeutic strategies.

Plasticity is defined as the ability to modify brain functioning, behaviors and mental states, and is increasingly recognized as a crucial process underlying the transition from psychopathology to wellbeing. Plasticity is neither inherently beneficial nor detrimental: enhanced plasticity increases the likelihood of a mental state transition without determining the direction of the transition, which is modulated by contextual factors such as quality of life. Treatments that enhance plasticity may therefore produce highly context-dependent effects. Lifestyle, environmental and psychotherapeutic interventions are also essential for promoting mental health, but not all individuals benefit equally, partly because of differences in individual plasticity levels. While psychometric tools to evaluate contextual factors have long been available, methods to operationalize and assess plasticity remain limited.

The Network Theory of Plasticity operationalizes plasticity as the inverse of connectivity strength among a system's elements: the weaker the connectivity, the higher the plasticity. Analyses of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) and Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) datasets provided preliminary evidence supporting this operationalization at the population level and showed its high sensitivity. PlastNet aims to validate this approach at the individual level and to use it to develop personalized therapeutic strategies.

Study design: PlastNet is an observational study. No medicinal product or medical device is under investigation, and no intervention is assigned. The procedures (blood sampling, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and clinical and neuropsychological assessments) are standard clinical and research tools, and no additional risk beyond routine clinical practice is anticipated. Two hundred adults with nonpsychotic MDD will be recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele over 24 months and followed for 4 weeks each. At baseline, participants undergo resting-state fMRI, blood sampling and clinical assessments; clinical assessments are repeated at the four-week follow-up. Contextual factors are assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire (quality of life), the Schedule of Recent Experiences (SRE) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (psychosocial stress), and socioeconomic status.

Primary objective and analysis: to generalize the operationalization of plasticity to the level of the central nervous system. The investigators hypothesize that lower baseline brain functional connectivity strength, derived from resting-state fMRI, is associated with a greater reduction in depressive symptom severity, measured as change in the total score of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) from baseline to four-week follow-up. Whole-brain connectivity strength is the primary predictor; connectivity within the default mode network and the salience network is a secondary predictor. Change in the total score of the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13) is analyzed as a supportive endpoint. Because there is no co-primary endpoint, no multiplicity adjustment is required.

Secondary objective: to identify biological signatures of plasticity through integrated multi-omics analyses of peripheral blood collected at baseline. The investigators hypothesize that baseline multi-omics profiles predict individual plasticity and change in the HDRS-17 and BDI-13 total scores. Analyses include transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by RNA sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq 6000), genomic analysis with the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array-24 (>680,000 markers) and untargeted metabolomics by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Data will be integrated using elastic net, random forests and Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent cOmponents (DIABLO) to generate individualized plasticity scores. Predictive accuracy will be assessed by cross-validation (alpha = 0.05), with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05).

Exploratory objective: to integrate symptom-based, neuroimaging-based and multi-omics-based plasticity measures into a unified individualized plasticity score and to investigate its interplay with contextual factors in determining treatment outcomes. No formal hypothesis is pre-specified; analyses are hypothesis-generating, and results will be considered preliminary pending replication.

Clinical significance: if validated, this approach could allow clinicians to tailor interventions to individual plasticity profiles, improving the precision and outcomes of psychiatric care.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (推定)

200

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~70年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

The enrolled population will consist of 200 adult patients, aged 18-70 years, diagnosed with nonpsychotic MDD according to DSM-5 criteria, and scoring 14 or higher on the HDRS.

説明

Inclusion Criteria

OSR will recruit 200 people who meet all these inclusion criteria:

  1. Is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  2. Aged 18-70.
  3. Diagnosed with nonpsychotic Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
  4. 14 or higher on the 17-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).

Exclusion Criteria

Considering the 200 MDD patients' sample OSR will recruit, an individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Diagnosed with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis NOS; anorexia or bulimia nervosa; OCD;
  2. Presents a medical condition not compatible with the protocol;
  3. Is pregnant or breast feeding.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 観測モデル:OTHER
  • 時間の展望:PROSPECTIVE

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
MDD cohort

200 adult outpatients and inpatients (aged 18-70 years) recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, with a DSM-5 diagnosis of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) and a score of 14 or higher on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Exclusion criteria are bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis NOS, anorexia or bulimia nervosa, OBCD, medical conditions incompatible with the protocol, and pregnancy or breastfeeding. At baseline, participants undergo structural and resting-state functional MRI, clinical and cognitive assessments, and blood sampling for multi-omic analyses. Clinical and cognitive assessments are repeated at 4 weeks. No intervention is assigned by the study; participants continue their usual care.

Standardized assessment of depressive symptom severity (17-item HDRS) and cognitive performance, together with the Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Schedule of Recent Experiences and the Perceived Stress Scale. Assessments are performed at baseline and repeated at the 4-week follow-up. Participants continue their usual care, and no treatment is assigned or modified by the study.

Structural and resting-state functional MRI (3T) performed at baseline to derive whole-brain and network-level functional connectivity (including the default mode and salience networks). Connectivity strength is used as an inverse measure of plasticity. This is an observational measurement only and is not used to assign or modify treatment.

Blood collection at enrollment for genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, including inflammation-related pathways. Molecular data are integrated with neuroimaging and clinical data to identify biological signatures of plasticity. Sampling is performed for research purposes only and does not influence clinical management.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score from baseline to week 4
時間枠:Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptom severity is measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), total score range 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Baseline whole-brain functional connectivity strength, derived from resting-state fMRI, is the predictor.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score from baseline to week 4, in relation to multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles
時間枠:Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptom severity is measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), with a total score range of 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data from peripheral blood collected at baseline) are the predictors.

Baseline to four-week follow-up
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13) total score from baseline to week 4, in relation to multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles
時間枠:Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptoms are measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13), a 13-item self-report questionnaire with a total score range of 0 to 39, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data from peripheral blood collected at baseline) are the predictors.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Integrated individualized plasticity score
時間枠:Baseline to four-week follow-up

Individualized plasticity score integrating symptom-based, neuroimaging-based and multi-omics-based measures, and its association with change in the total scores of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13), and with contextual factors at baseline: quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, WHOQOL-BREF), psychosocial stress (Schedule of Recent Experiences, SRE, and Perceived Stress Scale, PSS) and socioeconomic status.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Igor Branchi, PhD、Istituto Superiore di Sanità

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年11月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年12月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2029年11月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年11月2日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年11月6日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年11月12日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年11月12日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年11月6日

最終確認日

2026年11月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する