Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Predicting Transitions From Depression to Wellbeing Through a Network-based Operationalization of Plasticity (PlastNet)

6 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: Sara Poletti, IRCCS San Raffaele

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and many patients do not respond adequately to available treatments. Plasticity, the ability of the brain and mind to change, is thought to be a crucial process in the transition from depression to wellbeing, but methods to measure it are limited. The Network Theory of Plasticity proposes that the weaker the connections among the elements of a system (for example, the symptoms of a patient or the regions of the brain), the higher its plasticity. Earlier analyses of large clinical datasets (STAR*D and CO-MED) supported this idea at the population level.

PlastNet is an observational study that aims to validate this approach at the individual level. Two hundred adults (18-70 years) with nonpsychotic MDD recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele will undergo resting-state brain MRI, blood sampling and clinical assessments at baseline, and clinical assessments again after four weeks. No treatment is assigned by the study.

The investigators hypothesize that lower baseline functional connectivity in the brain is associated with a greater reduction in depressive symptoms over four weeks. The study will also investigate whether blood-based multi-omic profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic) can identify biological signatures of plasticity. The results could help clinicians tailor treatments to each patient's level of plasticity.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite available treatments, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond adequately, which highlights the need for approaches that personalize therapeutic strategies.

Plasticity is defined as the ability to modify brain functioning, behaviors and mental states, and is increasingly recognized as a crucial process underlying the transition from psychopathology to wellbeing. Plasticity is neither inherently beneficial nor detrimental: enhanced plasticity increases the likelihood of a mental state transition without determining the direction of the transition, which is modulated by contextual factors such as quality of life. Treatments that enhance plasticity may therefore produce highly context-dependent effects. Lifestyle, environmental and psychotherapeutic interventions are also essential for promoting mental health, but not all individuals benefit equally, partly because of differences in individual plasticity levels. While psychometric tools to evaluate contextual factors have long been available, methods to operationalize and assess plasticity remain limited.

The Network Theory of Plasticity operationalizes plasticity as the inverse of connectivity strength among a system's elements: the weaker the connectivity, the higher the plasticity. Analyses of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) and Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) datasets provided preliminary evidence supporting this operationalization at the population level and showed its high sensitivity. PlastNet aims to validate this approach at the individual level and to use it to develop personalized therapeutic strategies.

Study design: PlastNet is an observational study. No medicinal product or medical device is under investigation, and no intervention is assigned. The procedures (blood sampling, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and clinical and neuropsychological assessments) are standard clinical and research tools, and no additional risk beyond routine clinical practice is anticipated. Two hundred adults with nonpsychotic MDD will be recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele over 24 months and followed for 4 weeks each. At baseline, participants undergo resting-state fMRI, blood sampling and clinical assessments; clinical assessments are repeated at the four-week follow-up. Contextual factors are assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire (quality of life), the Schedule of Recent Experiences (SRE) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (psychosocial stress), and socioeconomic status.

Primary objective and analysis: to generalize the operationalization of plasticity to the level of the central nervous system. The investigators hypothesize that lower baseline brain functional connectivity strength, derived from resting-state fMRI, is associated with a greater reduction in depressive symptom severity, measured as change in the total score of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) from baseline to four-week follow-up. Whole-brain connectivity strength is the primary predictor; connectivity within the default mode network and the salience network is a secondary predictor. Change in the total score of the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13) is analyzed as a supportive endpoint. Because there is no co-primary endpoint, no multiplicity adjustment is required.

Secondary objective: to identify biological signatures of plasticity through integrated multi-omics analyses of peripheral blood collected at baseline. The investigators hypothesize that baseline multi-omics profiles predict individual plasticity and change in the HDRS-17 and BDI-13 total scores. Analyses include transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by RNA sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq 6000), genomic analysis with the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array-24 (>680,000 markers) and untargeted metabolomics by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Data will be integrated using elastic net, random forests and Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent cOmponents (DIABLO) to generate individualized plasticity scores. Predictive accuracy will be assessed by cross-validation (alpha = 0.05), with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05).

Exploratory objective: to integrate symptom-based, neuroimaging-based and multi-omics-based plasticity measures into a unified individualized plasticity score and to investigate its interplay with contextual factors in determining treatment outcomes. No formal hypothesis is pre-specified; analyses are hypothesis-generating, and results will be considered preliminary pending replication.

Clinical significance: if validated, this approach could allow clinicians to tailor interventions to individual plasticity profiles, improving the precision and outcomes of psychiatric care.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

200

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Sara Poletti, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 02 2643 3156
  • Correo electrónico: poletti.sara@hsr.it

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 70 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

The enrolled population will consist of 200 adult patients, aged 18-70 years, diagnosed with nonpsychotic MDD according to DSM-5 criteria, and scoring 14 or higher on the HDRS.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria

OSR will recruit 200 people who meet all these inclusion criteria:

  1. Is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  2. Aged 18-70.
  3. Diagnosed with nonpsychotic Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
  4. 14 or higher on the 17-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS).

Exclusion Criteria

Considering the 200 MDD patients' sample OSR will recruit, an individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Diagnosed with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis NOS; anorexia or bulimia nervosa; OCD;
  2. Presents a medical condition not compatible with the protocol;
  3. Is pregnant or breast feeding.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: OTHER
  • Perspectivas temporales: PROSPECTIVE

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
MDD cohort

200 adult outpatients and inpatients (aged 18-70 years) recruited at IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, with a DSM-5 diagnosis of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) and a score of 14 or higher on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Exclusion criteria are bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis NOS, anorexia or bulimia nervosa, OBCD, medical conditions incompatible with the protocol, and pregnancy or breastfeeding. At baseline, participants undergo structural and resting-state functional MRI, clinical and cognitive assessments, and blood sampling for multi-omic analyses. Clinical and cognitive assessments are repeated at 4 weeks. No intervention is assigned by the study; participants continue their usual care.

Standardized assessment of depressive symptom severity (17-item HDRS) and cognitive performance, together with the Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Schedule of Recent Experiences and the Perceived Stress Scale. Assessments are performed at baseline and repeated at the 4-week follow-up. Participants continue their usual care, and no treatment is assigned or modified by the study.

Structural and resting-state functional MRI (3T) performed at baseline to derive whole-brain and network-level functional connectivity (including the default mode and salience networks). Connectivity strength is used as an inverse measure of plasticity. This is an observational measurement only and is not used to assign or modify treatment.

Blood collection at enrollment for genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, including inflammation-related pathways. Molecular data are integrated with neuroimaging and clinical data to identify biological signatures of plasticity. Sampling is performed for research purposes only and does not influence clinical management.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score from baseline to week 4
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptom severity is measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), total score range 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Baseline whole-brain functional connectivity strength, derived from resting-state fMRI, is the predictor.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score from baseline to week 4, in relation to multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptom severity is measured with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), with a total score range of 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data from peripheral blood collected at baseline) are the predictors.

Baseline to four-week follow-up
Change in Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13) total score from baseline to week 4, in relation to multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to four-week follow-up

Depressive symptoms are measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-13 (BDI-13), a 13-item self-report questionnaire with a total score range of 0 to 39, where higher scores indicate more severe depression (worse outcome). The outcome is the change in total score from baseline to week 4. Multi-omics-derived plasticity profiles (genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic data from peripheral blood collected at baseline) are the predictors.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Integrated individualized plasticity score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to four-week follow-up

Individualized plasticity score integrating symptom-based, neuroimaging-based and multi-omics-based measures, and its association with change in the total scores of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13), and with contextual factors at baseline: quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, WHOQOL-BREF), psychosocial stress (Schedule of Recent Experiences, SRE, and Perceived Stress Scale, PSS) and socioeconomic status.

Baseline to four-week follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Igor Branchi, PhD, Istituto Superiore di Sanità

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2029

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de noviembre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de noviembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

12 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

12 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de noviembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir