Decision Support for Simulated Emergency Triage by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Study
Development, Validation, and Human-AI Collaboration Evaluation of a Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale Decision Support System
This randomized, three-period crossover study will evaluate a Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale (TTAS) decision support system in a controlled simulation. Thirty nurses with emergency triage training or experience will each assess three different sets of 50 standardized, de-identified emergency cases. The three study conditions are unassisted triage, case-specific TTAS decision support, and a sham assistance interface. The order of conditions will be randomized, with 7 to 14 days between study periods. The main outcomes are agreement between nurses' final TTAS levels and an expert reference standard, active time needed to assess 50 cases, and a prespecified safety-adjusted efficiency score. Additional outcomes include undertriage, overtriage, workload, usability, and responses to misleading advice. The system will not be used for actual patient triage or entered into clinical records.
調査の概要
状態
条件
詳細な説明
The study will develop a traceable TTAS rule knowledge base and evaluate a decision support prototype in simulated emergency triage. A language-processing component identifies candidate complaints, vital signs, and modifiers from standardized case narratives. A deterministic rules engine generates a suggested TTAS level, matched rules, prompts for additional information, and a draft note. Nurses retain final decision authority. Three balanced case sets of 50 de-identified cases will be prepared from retrospective emergency data. At least two experienced emergency physicians or triage nursing experts will independently establish the reference TTAS level; disagreements will be adjudicated by a third blinded expert. Participants will be stratified by clinical experience and site and assigned to one of six condition sequences. Each participant completes all three conditions with different case sets and a 7- to 14-day interval between periods. The sham interface resembles the active interface but provides suggestions that are not based on the individual case, allowing assessment of automation bias. Analysis will account for study condition, period, sequence, case set, participant experience, case acuity, and repeated observations within participants and cases. This is a simulation study; no decision support output is used in care of real patients.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前：Yen-Pin Chen, PhD
- 電話番号：+886 978732756
- メール：f06945029@g.ntuh.edu.tw
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Able to read Chinese and use the study computer platform.
- Prior emergency triage training or practical emergency triage experience.
- Willing to provide written informed consent and complete the planned case assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to provide valid informed consent.
- Unable to perform basic operations on the study platform or to follow the study schedule.
- Involved in developing the study system or aware of details distinguishing active from sham assistance in a way that could compromise masking.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：クロスオーバー割り当て
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
介入なし：Sequence A[BC]
Period 1: unassisted triage (A); and then Period 2: active TTAS decision support (B); Period 3: sham assistance (C). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: sham assistance (C); Period 3: active TTAS decision support (B). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Sequence B[AC]
Period 1: active TTAS decision support (B); and then Period 2: unassisted triage (A); Period 3: sham assistance (C). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: sham assistance (C); Period 3: unassisted triage (A). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
During review of 50 standardized cases, a research-only interface displays candidate presenting complaints, matched TTAS rules, a suggested triage level, prompts for missing information, and a draft triage note. The nurse makes the final decision. |
|
プラセボコンパレーター：Sequence C[AB]
Period 1: sham assistance (C); and then Period 2: unassisted triage (A); Period 3: active TTAS decision support (B). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: active TTAS decision support (B); Period 3: unassisted triage (A). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
During review of 50 standardized cases, an interface resembling the active system displays non-case-specific or distribution-matched suggestions. These suggestions are for simulation only and are not used in patient care. |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Exact agreement with expert TTAS reference standard
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments for which the nurse's final five-level TTAS assignment exactly matches the adjudicated expert reference level, evaluated separately under each condition. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Active time to complete 50 case assessments
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Total active time in minutes required to complete the 50-case set in each condition, excluding recorded breaks and system interruptions. The analysis of incomplete sets must be specified before enrollment. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Safety-Adjusted Efficiency Score
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Prespecified score combining TTAS accuracy and speed. The approved protocol assigns 1.0 for exact agreement, 0.8 or 0.6 for overtriage by one or two levels, 0.4 for undertriage by one level, and 0 for undertriage by two or more levels, with additional penalties for undertriage of Level 1-2 cases. The exact high-acuity penalty, time component, aggregation, score range, and handling of missing cases require final specification before submission. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity for high-acuity cases (TTAS Levels 1-2)
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Proportion of expert-reference Level 1-2 cases assigned Level 1 or 2 by the nurse under each condition. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Undertriage rate
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments in which the nurse's final TTAS level indicates lower urgency than the expert reference standard; severe undertriage will be reported separately according to the prespecified threshold. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Overtriage rate
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments in which the nurse's final TTAS level indicates higher urgency than the expert reference standard. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Acceptance of incorrect suggestions in the sham condition
時間枠：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of sham-assisted cases in which an incorrect displayed recommendation is accepted in the nurse's final TTAS decision; denominator and incorrectness criteria to be prespecified. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- 202608042RIND
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。