Decision Support for Simulated Emergency Triage by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Study
Development, Validation, and Human-AI Collaboration Evaluation of a Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale Decision Support System
This randomized, three-period crossover study will evaluate a Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale (TTAS) decision support system in a controlled simulation. Thirty nurses with emergency triage training or experience will each assess three different sets of 50 standardized, de-identified emergency cases. The three study conditions are unassisted triage, case-specific TTAS decision support, and a sham assistance interface. The order of conditions will be randomized, with 7 to 14 days between study periods. The main outcomes are agreement between nurses' final TTAS levels and an expert reference standard, active time needed to assess 50 cases, and a prespecified safety-adjusted efficiency score. Additional outcomes include undertriage, overtriage, workload, usability, and responses to misleading advice. The system will not be used for actual patient triage or entered into clinical records.
研究概览
详细说明
The study will develop a traceable TTAS rule knowledge base and evaluate a decision support prototype in simulated emergency triage. A language-processing component identifies candidate complaints, vital signs, and modifiers from standardized case narratives. A deterministic rules engine generates a suggested TTAS level, matched rules, prompts for additional information, and a draft note. Nurses retain final decision authority. Three balanced case sets of 50 de-identified cases will be prepared from retrospective emergency data. At least two experienced emergency physicians or triage nursing experts will independently establish the reference TTAS level; disagreements will be adjudicated by a third blinded expert. Participants will be stratified by clinical experience and site and assigned to one of six condition sequences. Each participant completes all three conditions with different case sets and a 7- to 14-day interval between periods. The sham interface resembles the active interface but provides suggestions that are not based on the individual case, allowing assessment of automation bias. Analysis will account for study condition, period, sequence, case set, participant experience, case acuity, and repeated observations within participants and cases. This is a simulation study; no decision support output is used in care of real patients.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Yen-Pin Chen, PhD
- 电话号码：+886 978732756
- 邮箱：f06945029@g.ntuh.edu.tw
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Able to read Chinese and use the study computer platform.
- Prior emergency triage training or practical emergency triage experience.
- Willing to provide written informed consent and complete the planned case assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to provide valid informed consent.
- Unable to perform basic operations on the study platform or to follow the study schedule.
- Involved in developing the study system or aware of details distinguishing active from sham assistance in a way that could compromise masking.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：交叉作业
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预：Sequence A[BC]
Period 1: unassisted triage (A); and then Period 2: active TTAS decision support (B); Period 3: sham assistance (C). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: sham assistance (C); Period 3: active TTAS decision support (B). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
|
|
有源比较器：Sequence B[AC]
Period 1: active TTAS decision support (B); and then Period 2: unassisted triage (A); Period 3: sham assistance (C). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: sham assistance (C); Period 3: unassisted triage (A). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
During review of 50 standardized cases, a research-only interface displays candidate presenting complaints, matched TTAS rules, a suggested triage level, prompts for missing information, and a draft triage note. The nurse makes the final decision. |
|
安慰剂比较：Sequence C[AB]
Period 1: sham assistance (C); and then Period 2: unassisted triage (A); Period 3: active TTAS decision support (B). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. Period 2: active TTAS decision support (B); Period 3: unassisted triage (A). Each period includes 50 different standardized cases. |
During review of 50 standardized cases, an interface resembling the active system displays non-case-specific or distribution-matched suggestions. These suggestions are for simulation only and are not used in patient care. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Exact agreement with expert TTAS reference standard
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments for which the nurse's final five-level TTAS assignment exactly matches the adjudicated expert reference level, evaluated separately under each condition. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Active time to complete 50 case assessments
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Total active time in minutes required to complete the 50-case set in each condition, excluding recorded breaks and system interruptions. The analysis of incomplete sets must be specified before enrollment. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Safety-Adjusted Efficiency Score
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Prespecified score combining TTAS accuracy and speed. The approved protocol assigns 1.0 for exact agreement, 0.8 or 0.6 for overtriage by one or two levels, 0.4 for undertriage by one level, and 0 for undertriage by two or more levels, with additional penalties for undertriage of Level 1-2 cases. The exact high-acuity penalty, time component, aggregation, score range, and handling of missing cases require final specification before submission. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity for high-acuity cases (TTAS Levels 1-2)
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Proportion of expert-reference Level 1-2 cases assigned Level 1 or 2 by the nurse under each condition. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Undertriage rate
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments in which the nurse's final TTAS level indicates lower urgency than the expert reference standard; severe undertriage will be reported separately according to the prespecified threshold. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Overtriage rate
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of completed case assessments in which the nurse's final TTAS level indicates higher urgency than the expert reference standard. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
|
Acceptance of incorrect suggestions in the sham condition
大体时间：During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
Percentage of sham-assisted cases in which an incorrect displayed recommendation is accepted in the nurse's final TTAS decision; denominator and incorrectness criteria to be prespecified. |
During each of three approximately 60-minute study periods, separated by 7-14 days; up to approximately 4 weeks per participant.
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 202608042RIND
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.