이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Satisfaction of Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Insulin Therapy

2018년 10월 2일 업데이트: Guillermo Umpierrez, MD, Emory University

Satisfaction of Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Insulin Therapy Using Pens for a Basal Insulin Treatment (STEP IT UP a BIT)

Several studies have shown that high blood sugar (glucose) levels are associated with diseases caused by diabetes. Controlling the glucose may prevent these complications. As people age, their bodies become unable to make enough insulin to control the blood sugars. Pills used to treat diabetes may help for a while, but many times this does not last. When the blood sugar is too high, insulin is frequently recommended and used to treat diabetes. Insulin is often started by adding a long-acting insulin to the medicines a patient already takes. In this study, glargine insulin will be taken together with the diabetes pills currently being used. Glargine is a long-acting insulin which is given under the skin once a day. Glargine is approved for use in the treatment of patients with diabetes by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration).

Currently, insulin delivery is only available as a shot. The purpose of this study is to compare how satisfied patients are when using two different types of insulin shots. Specifically, this study aims to determine if people over 65 years old are more satisfied taking insulin shots by pens or syringes. Everyone who joins in this study will have a chance to use the insulin syringes and the insulin pens.

The ability of patients to give themselves shots can affect how well the sugar is controlled. As people age, medical and other problems may develop that affect their ability to do certain things. Another aim of this study is to determine if the ability to use an insulin pen and insulin syringe is affected by age or some other problem.

During this study, participants will be treated with insulin given by a syringe for 12 weeks and by a pen for 12 weeks. Questionnaires will be given to determine satisfaction with treatment throughout the study. The investigators hypothesize that among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing oral agent therapy, treatment with basal insulin via a pen device results in higher treatment satisfaction scores and more accurate dosing than treatment with basal insulin via conventional vial and syringe methods.

A total of 56 subjects with type 2 diabetes will be recruited into this study. The site for the study is Grady Memorial Hospital clinics in Atlanta, Georgia.

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

49

단계

  • 4단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, 미국, 30303
        • Grady Memorial Hospital

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

60년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females aged ≥60 years
  2. History of type 2 diabetes of >3 months duration
  3. Current use oral antidiabetic agents and/or diet to treat the diabetes
  4. A1c ≤10.0% and fasting glucose ≤300 mg/dL
  5. A1c ≥7.0% and/or fasting glucose ≥150 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a known allergy to glargine or any of its metabolites
  2. Subjects unwilling to self-inject insulin
  3. Inability to self-monitor blood glucose
  4. Current or previous use of insulin for more than 6 continuous months prior to study enrollment
  5. Subjects with documented clinically relevant hepatic disease (diagnosed liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension), corticosteroid therapy, impaired renal function (creatinine >3.0 mg/dL), uncontrolled endocrine disorders associated with increased insulin resistance such as acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, or hyperthyroidism
  6. Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and/or possible consequences of the study
  7. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Vial & Syringe (Period 1) / Pen (Period 2)
Crossover phase: patients randomized to the sequence: Insulin glargine vial and syringe in Period 1 and Insulin glargine SoloSTAR pen in Period 2.
oral antidiabetic agents plus once daily insulin glargine via an insulin syringe
다른 이름들:
  • 란투스
oral antidiabetic agents plus insulin glargine in a pre-filled pen
다른 이름들:
  • 솔로스타
실험적: Pen (Period 1) / Vial & Syringe (Period 2)
Crossover phase: patients randomized to the sequence: Insulin glargine SoloSTAR® pen in Period 1 and Insulin glargine vial and syringe in Period 2.
oral antidiabetic agents plus once daily insulin glargine via an insulin syringe
다른 이름들:
  • 란투스
oral antidiabetic agents plus insulin glargine in a pre-filled pen
다른 이름들:
  • 솔로스타

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (DTSQs) Score
기간: Baseline, Week 12
Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (DTSQs). The questionnaire contains eight items scored on a seven-point scale where 0 = very dissatisfied and 6 = very satisfied. The satisfaction score is obtained from summing responses to questions 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and the total score can range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with diabetes treatment.
Baseline, Week 12
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Change (DTSQc) Score
기간: Week 24
Treatment satisfaction after crossover into the second treatment period was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Change (DTSQc). The questionnaire contains eight items scored on a seven-point scale where -3 = much less satisfied now and 3 = much more satisfied now. The satisfaction score is obtained from summing responses to questions 1, and 4 through 8 (the remaining two items assess perceived blood sugar levels). The total score can range from -18 to 18. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the new diabetes treatment, compared to prior treatment, while scores below 0 mean that satisfaction with the new delivery method of insulin in Period 2 is lower than satisfaction with the delivery method in Period 1.
Week 24

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
기간: Baseline, Week 12
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average percentage of blood sugar over the past 2 to 3 months. HbA1c levels below 5.7% are considered normal. Persons with values between 5.7% and 6.4% are considered at high risk of developing diabetes while those with values of 6.5% and above are diagnosed with diabetes. HbA1c can reduce with management of diabetes through diet, exercise, and medication.
Baseline, Week 12
Fasting Blood Glucose
기간: Baseline, Week 12
Blood sugar levels are influenced by the size and types of food consumed during the last meal and the production and response to insulin. Fasting blood glucose levels of less than 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) are considered normal. Values between 100 and 125 mg/dL indicate prediabetes and values of 126 mg/dL and higher indicate diabetes. Fasting blood glucose levels can lower depending on food consumed and medications.
Baseline, Week 12
Percent of Participants With Dosing Errors
기간: Week 24
Percentage of participants who had dosing errors during the course of the study (both study periods). Participants were instructed on using each device and practiced preparing and injecting the insulin dose into a pillow to assess accuracy with each method of delivering insulin. Dosing errors were defined as inaccurate preparation or injection by less than or equal to 10% of the intended dose, independent of vision and dexterity function.
Week 24
Number of Hypoglycemic Events
기간: Week 24
The number of hypoglycemic events occurring during the 24-week study period is reported here. For the purposes of this study, hypoglycemia is defined as a capillary and/or laboratory blood glucose value of less than 70 mg/dL.
Week 24

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

협력자

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Christoper Newton, MD, Emory University SOM
  • 수석 연구원: Dawn Smiley, MD, MSCR, Emory University SOM

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2011년 1월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2012년 8월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2012년 12월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2010년 11월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2010년 11월 10일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2010년 11월 15일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 10월 31일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2018년 10월 2일

마지막으로 확인됨

2018년 10월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • IRB00046366

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다