此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Satisfaction of Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Insulin Therapy

2018年10月2日 更新者:Guillermo Umpierrez, MD、Emory University

Satisfaction of Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Insulin Therapy Using Pens for a Basal Insulin Treatment (STEP IT UP a BIT)

Several studies have shown that high blood sugar (glucose) levels are associated with diseases caused by diabetes. Controlling the glucose may prevent these complications. As people age, their bodies become unable to make enough insulin to control the blood sugars. Pills used to treat diabetes may help for a while, but many times this does not last. When the blood sugar is too high, insulin is frequently recommended and used to treat diabetes. Insulin is often started by adding a long-acting insulin to the medicines a patient already takes. In this study, glargine insulin will be taken together with the diabetes pills currently being used. Glargine is a long-acting insulin which is given under the skin once a day. Glargine is approved for use in the treatment of patients with diabetes by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration).

Currently, insulin delivery is only available as a shot. The purpose of this study is to compare how satisfied patients are when using two different types of insulin shots. Specifically, this study aims to determine if people over 65 years old are more satisfied taking insulin shots by pens or syringes. Everyone who joins in this study will have a chance to use the insulin syringes and the insulin pens.

The ability of patients to give themselves shots can affect how well the sugar is controlled. As people age, medical and other problems may develop that affect their ability to do certain things. Another aim of this study is to determine if the ability to use an insulin pen and insulin syringe is affected by age or some other problem.

During this study, participants will be treated with insulin given by a syringe for 12 weeks and by a pen for 12 weeks. Questionnaires will be given to determine satisfaction with treatment throughout the study. The investigators hypothesize that among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing oral agent therapy, treatment with basal insulin via a pen device results in higher treatment satisfaction scores and more accurate dosing than treatment with basal insulin via conventional vial and syringe methods.

A total of 56 subjects with type 2 diabetes will be recruited into this study. The site for the study is Grady Memorial Hospital clinics in Atlanta, Georgia.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

49

阶段

  • 第四阶段

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta、Georgia、美国、30303
        • Grady Memorial Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

60年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females aged ≥60 years
  2. History of type 2 diabetes of >3 months duration
  3. Current use oral antidiabetic agents and/or diet to treat the diabetes
  4. A1c ≤10.0% and fasting glucose ≤300 mg/dL
  5. A1c ≥7.0% and/or fasting glucose ≥150 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a known allergy to glargine or any of its metabolites
  2. Subjects unwilling to self-inject insulin
  3. Inability to self-monitor blood glucose
  4. Current or previous use of insulin for more than 6 continuous months prior to study enrollment
  5. Subjects with documented clinically relevant hepatic disease (diagnosed liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension), corticosteroid therapy, impaired renal function (creatinine >3.0 mg/dL), uncontrolled endocrine disorders associated with increased insulin resistance such as acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, or hyperthyroidism
  6. Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and/or possible consequences of the study
  7. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Vial & Syringe (Period 1) / Pen (Period 2)
Crossover phase: patients randomized to the sequence: Insulin glargine vial and syringe in Period 1 and Insulin glargine SoloSTAR pen in Period 2.
oral antidiabetic agents plus once daily insulin glargine via an insulin syringe
其他名称:
  • 来得时
oral antidiabetic agents plus insulin glargine in a pre-filled pen
其他名称:
  • 独星
实验性的:Pen (Period 1) / Vial & Syringe (Period 2)
Crossover phase: patients randomized to the sequence: Insulin glargine SoloSTAR® pen in Period 1 and Insulin glargine vial and syringe in Period 2.
oral antidiabetic agents plus once daily insulin glargine via an insulin syringe
其他名称:
  • 来得时
oral antidiabetic agents plus insulin glargine in a pre-filled pen
其他名称:
  • 独星

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (DTSQs) Score
大体时间:Baseline, Week 12
Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Status (DTSQs). The questionnaire contains eight items scored on a seven-point scale where 0 = very dissatisfied and 6 = very satisfied. The satisfaction score is obtained from summing responses to questions 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and the total score can range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with diabetes treatment.
Baseline, Week 12
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Change (DTSQc) Score
大体时间:Week 24
Treatment satisfaction after crossover into the second treatment period was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: Change (DTSQc). The questionnaire contains eight items scored on a seven-point scale where -3 = much less satisfied now and 3 = much more satisfied now. The satisfaction score is obtained from summing responses to questions 1, and 4 through 8 (the remaining two items assess perceived blood sugar levels). The total score can range from -18 to 18. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with the new diabetes treatment, compared to prior treatment, while scores below 0 mean that satisfaction with the new delivery method of insulin in Period 2 is lower than satisfaction with the delivery method in Period 1.
Week 24

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
大体时间:Baseline, Week 12
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average percentage of blood sugar over the past 2 to 3 months. HbA1c levels below 5.7% are considered normal. Persons with values between 5.7% and 6.4% are considered at high risk of developing diabetes while those with values of 6.5% and above are diagnosed with diabetes. HbA1c can reduce with management of diabetes through diet, exercise, and medication.
Baseline, Week 12
Fasting Blood Glucose
大体时间:Baseline, Week 12
Blood sugar levels are influenced by the size and types of food consumed during the last meal and the production and response to insulin. Fasting blood glucose levels of less than 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) are considered normal. Values between 100 and 125 mg/dL indicate prediabetes and values of 126 mg/dL and higher indicate diabetes. Fasting blood glucose levels can lower depending on food consumed and medications.
Baseline, Week 12
Percent of Participants With Dosing Errors
大体时间:Week 24
Percentage of participants who had dosing errors during the course of the study (both study periods). Participants were instructed on using each device and practiced preparing and injecting the insulin dose into a pillow to assess accuracy with each method of delivering insulin. Dosing errors were defined as inaccurate preparation or injection by less than or equal to 10% of the intended dose, independent of vision and dexterity function.
Week 24
Number of Hypoglycemic Events
大体时间:Week 24
The number of hypoglycemic events occurring during the 24-week study period is reported here. For the purposes of this study, hypoglycemia is defined as a capillary and/or laboratory blood glucose value of less than 70 mg/dL.
Week 24

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

合作者

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Christoper Newton, MD、Emory University SOM
  • 首席研究员:Dawn Smiley, MD, MSCR、Emory University SOM

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2011年1月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2012年8月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2012年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2010年11月9日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2010年11月10日

首次发布 (估计)

2010年11月15日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年10月31日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年10月2日

最后验证

2018年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • IRB00046366

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

是的

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅