Effects of Repeated Decision Making Among Surrogates of Seriously Ill Patients
2015년 1월 27일 업데이트: Scott Halpern, University of Pennsylvania
Pilot Study of Repeated Decision Making in Surrogates
Decision making capacity fatigues after repeated decisions similar to skeletal muscle.
The result is decision fatigue, in which subsequent decisions are altered toward the status quo.
Surrogates are at risk for decision fatigue yet it has not been studied.
We propose a randomized study in the outpatient setting in surrogates and patients at high risk for needing to make complex decisions, in an effort to determine the impact of decision fatigue on surrogate self-control and subsequent choices.
연구 개요
상세 설명
Just as skeletal muscle fatigues after repeated use, decision-making capacity fatigues when repeated choices are made.
This phenomenon, in which people experience diminished concentration and willpower after repeated decision-making, is termed decision fatigue.
People experiencing decision fatigue are more likely to bias subsequent choices toward the status quo.
By choosing the status quo, the decision-maker reserves the option to make an alternate choice at a later time, thereby preserving possibilities.
Patients and their surrogates often make complex medical decisions for which they may have little experience.
Although clearly at high risk, decision fatigue has not been studied in this population.
To elucidate these questions, we propose a four-arm study of surrogates and patients in a population at high risk for making complex decisions.
Surrogates will be randomly assigned to varied levels of decision making effort to assess for the development of resultant decision fatigue and whether it alters subsequent decisions.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
132
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19104
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients must have one of the following diagnoses: aplastic anemia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, stage IIIB or IV lung cancer, mesothelioma and/or stage IIIB or IV gastrointestinal cancer (pancreatic, biliary, esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, colon), stage IV melanoma.
- Patients must have at least one surrogate at their clinic visit who is willing to enroll with them as a pair to be included.
- Surrogates are eligible if an eligible patient identifies them as as a surrogate and both consent for the study.
- All participants must be over the age 18
- All participants must be fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients and surrogates will be excluded if they are illiterate or have a medical condition known to alter Stroop performance. These include individuals who are visually impaired such that they cannot read a computer screen, blind or colorblind, patients given sedating medications during their appointment and individuals with past medical history of cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure disorder, dementia or traumatic head injury with loss of consciousness.
- Patients will be ineligible if they have either tracheostomy or are currently on hemodialysis as these would significantly alter responses to the mechanical ventilation hypothetical scenario and the hypothetical life sustaining therapy question.
- Surrogates and patients are ineligible if their paired participant is excluded for any of the above reasons.
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
간섭 없음: DLST Only
Surrogates will complete the Stroop test then answer the hypothetical life sustaining therapy (LST)
|
|
|
실험적: Contemplate only
Surrogates will contemplate each of the 3 scenarios but not make any decisions, then complete the Stroop test and answer the hypothetical LST question
|
Surrogates are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making.
We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.
|
|
실험적: Decide with advice
Surrogates will make decisions on 4 scenarios with physician advice, then complete the Stroop test and answer the hypothetical LST question.
Within this arm, surrogates will receive two positive recommendations (i.e. to go ahead with the intervention) and two negative recommendations (i.e. to decline the intervention).
These positive and negative recommendations will be randomly assigned upon study enrollment.
With four hypothetical scenarios, there are six possible options for recommendation variations.
|
Surrogates are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making.
We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.
|
|
실험적: Decide without advice
Surrogates will make decisions on 4 scenarios without physician advice, then complete the Stroop test and the hypothetical LST question.
|
Surrogates are exposed to three hypothetical medical scenarios that require varying levels of decision making.
We will be assessing how this experience alters their subsequent choice to forego life sustaining therapy.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Test Score
기간: Approximately 15 minutes
|
Measurement of score will be done at the conclusion of instrument completion.
The Stroop test is a standard measure of self control that requires three tasks.
The last task is the most difficult where the participant must suppress the urge to read the word which is the easier task and instead say the color it is printed in.
Standard scoring is the number correct in the Word trial minus the Color-Word trials.
This data will be collected immediately following completion.
|
Approximately 15 minutes
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Evidence of status quo bias
기간: Approximately 10 minutes
|
Evidence of status quo bias as assessed by hypothetical decision to limit life sustaining therapy or to continue treatment.
To assess for status quo bias, we will use the following technique: after the initial four hypothetical questions and Stroop testing, participants will be asked a hypothetical question about life sustaining therapy (LST).
In the question, continuing life sustaining therapy will be counted as maintaining the status quo.
This is based on current norms in American health care where life sustaining therapy is continued until a patient or surrogate specifically request otherwise.
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Scott D. Halpern, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작
2012년 11월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2013년 4월 1일
연구 완료 (실제)
2013년 4월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2012년 11월 1일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2012년 11월 5일
처음 게시됨 (추정)
2012년 11월 7일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)
2015년 1월 29일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2015년 1월 27일
마지막으로 확인됨
2015년 1월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 816697
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .