이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Mindfulness for Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns

2016년 9월 12일 업데이트: King's College London

Examining the Effects of a Brief Mindfulness Based Intervention (BMBI) on Mood and Cognitive Functioning in an Older Adult Population

The current study will examine the effects of a brief mindfulness based intervention (BMBI) on mood, memory and attention in comparison to a wait-list control (WLC) group. Participants for the study will be 90 adults aged 50 years and above who have presented at a memory clinic within SLaM NHS Trust with subjective cognitive concerns and/or those who have received a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from their memory clinic.

연구 개요

상태

알려지지 않은

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the BMBI group or the WLC group. Those assigned to the BMBI group will complete a number of cognitive assessments and questionnaires at Time 1. They will then receive a 45 minute mindfulness intervention. Following this, they will be asked to practice mindfulness for 30 minutes per day for 7 days a week in their own homes. After 7 days, participants in the BMBI group will be invited to complete a paired set of cognitive assessments and questionnaires (Time 2). Participants in the WLC group will complete the same number of cognitive assessments and questionnaires as the BMBI group at Time 1. However, they will not receive the 45 minute mindfulness intervention nor will they be asked to practice it at home for 7 days. After 7 days, participants in the WLC group will be invited to complete a paired set of cognitive assessments and questionnaires (Time 2). After completion of the measures at Time 2, the WLC participants will then receive the 45 minute mindfulness intervention. All assessments, questionnaires and the intervention will be carried out either in a SLaM memory clinic or at participants own homes depending on level of mobility.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (예상)

90

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 영국
      • London, 영국, SE5 8AF
        • 모병
        • South London and Maudsely NHS Memory Services
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

50년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:People aged 50 years and older with subjective memory concerns (SMC) and/or those who meet criteria for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who have been seen by one of the three SLAM memory services (i.e. Croydon Memory Service; Southwark and Lambeth Memory Service; and Lewisham Memory Service) in the past three months. Participants must be able to give informed consent to participate.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of dementia or multi-domain mild cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, current substance misuse, a current diagnosis of epilepsy or another neurodegenerative disorder (such as Parkinson's), a history of brain injury or stroke, a severe and enduring mental health disorder (e.g. severe depression or anxiety, personality disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar affective disorder), active suicidal ideation, severe sensory impairment that would significantly impair a person's ability to engage in the intervention.

-

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Brief Mindfulness
45 minute brief mindfulness intervention (lead by study investigator) on day 1 followed by 7 days of 30 minute mindfulness practice at home (without study investigator)
다른: Brief Mindfulness
15 minutes psycho-education about mindfulness and a small experiential exercise using a raisin. Following this, participants listen to a 30minute pre-recorded sitting meditation which encourages them to focus on their breath and the sounds around them. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive the brief mindfulness intervention immediately or will be asked to wait one week before receiving the intervention.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Test of Everyday Attention
기간: Change in attention from Baseline to 1 Week
The Test of Everyday Attention (TEA): Two subtests from the TEA (Robertson et al., 1994) will be used in the current study. Specifically, the Elevator Test will be used to measure sustained attention and the Visual Elevator Test will be used as a measure of attentional switching, and hence of cognitive flexibility. The TEA subtests are based on everyday life scenarios offering greater ecological validity. It has parallel forms which allow for repeat administration within short time periods reducing the impact of practice effects.
Change in attention from Baseline to 1 Week

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
기간: Change in anxiety and depression from Baseline to 1 Week
The HADS consists of two subscales measuring depression and anxiety respectively. Each subscale consists of seven items and responses on the items are based on the relative frequency of symptoms over the past week using a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very often indeed). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression and anxiety, and scores of about 10 on each subscale indicate clinical significance.
Change in anxiety and depression from Baseline to 1 Week
Penn State Worry Questionnaire
기간: Change in worry from Baseline to 1 Week
Penn State Worry Questionnaire: The PSWQ is a 16-item measure of worry that has shown adequate internal consistency and convergent validity in elderly patients with GAD and controls( Beck et al., 1995 and Stanley et al., 2001). It uses a Likert rating from 1 (not at all typical of me) to 5 (very typical of me).
Change in worry from Baseline to 1 Week
Short Form Health Survey
기간: Change in quality of life from Baseline to 1 Week
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): The physical and mental summary scores of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Van de Zee et al., 1993) are used to measure quality of life related to physical and mental aspects. The SF-36 is composed of 36 items measuring health across eight dimensions: physical functioning, social functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, pain, mental health, vitality, and general health perception. These eight subscales can be summarized into one physical and one mental component summary score. Each dimension score ranges from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Change in quality of life from Baseline to 1 Week
The Trail Making Test Parts A&B
기간: Change in executive functioning from Baseline to 1 Week
The Trail Making Test (TMT; Army Individual Test Battery, 1944) is a commonly used neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of 2 parts: part A asks participants to connect a series of numbers in ascending order on a page, while part B requires participants to draw a line alternating between ascending numbers and letters. Part A is used primarily to capture processing speed whereas Part B requires more complex attention shifting, planning, and concentration, and is, thus, considered a valid index of executive control. The time taken to complete the task is the primary performance outcome
Change in executive functioning from Baseline to 1 Week
Digit Span Task
기간: Change in working memory from Baseline to 1 Week
Digit Span is a core working memory sub-test of the WAIS-IV (Wechsler, 2008). It requires participants to repeat a series of digits forwards and backwards with series ranging in length from 2 to 9 digits. This test also measures auditory sequential processing as the individual must recall auditory information and repeat it back aloud. The Digit Span subtest has revealed an average test-retest reliability of .82 (Wechsler, 2008b).
Change in working memory from Baseline to 1 Week
Letter-Number Sequencing Task
기간: Change in working memory from Baseline to 1 Week
Letter Number Sequencing is a subtest of the WAIS-IV (Wechsler, 2008) and is a measure of attention and short-term memory. Lemay et al. (2004) report test-retest reliability data of between .73 and .75 in a two-week interval in middle aged to elderly subjects suggesting it can be reliably used in repeated neuropsychological assessments.
Change in working memory from Baseline to 1 Week
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
기간: Change in subjective cognitive concerns from Baseline to 1 Week
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (Broadbent et al., 1982) will be used as a measure of subjective cognitive complaints. The CFQ has been shown to have acceptable internal consistency and retest reliability, and good face validity in a sample of older adults (Knight et al., 2004).
Change in subjective cognitive concerns from Baseline to 1 Week
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
기간: Change in mindfulness from Baseline to 1 Week
The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): The FFMQ (Baer et al., 2006) assesses five components of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience. It has been shown to have good internal consistency (Baer et al., 2006) and adequate construct validity (Baer et al., 2008).
Change in mindfulness from Baseline to 1 Week
Ruminative Response Scale of the Response Styles Questionnaire
기간: Change in rumination from Baseline to 1 Week
Ruminative Response Scale of the Response Styles Questionnaire (RRS of RSQ; Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991). The RRS will be administered to assess participants' tendencies to ruminate in response to their symptoms of negative emotion. The RRS includes 22 items in response to depressed mood that are self-focused (e.g., "I think why do I always react this way?"), symptom focused (e.g., "I think about how hard it is to concentrate"), and focused on the possible consequences and causes of mood (e.g., "I think I won't be able to do my job if I don't snap out of this"), which participants rate on a scale from 1 (never) to 4 (always). Total scores range from 22 to 88 with higher scores indicating greater rumination.
Change in rumination from Baseline to 1 Week
Self-Compassion Scale Short-Form
기간: Change in self-compassion from Baseline to 1 Week
Self-Compassion Scale Short-Form (SCS-SF): The SCS-SF (Raes, Pommier, Neff, & Van Gucht, 2011) measures self-compassion and it has the following sub-scales: self-kindness, self-judgment, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identification. Participants have to rate how often they behave in a stated manner (e.g., "When I'm going through a very hard time, I give myself the caring and tenderness I need") in a scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Total scores range from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater self-compassion
Change in self-compassion from Baseline to 1 Week
CORE-10
기간: Change in general psychological functioning from Baseline to 1 Week
CORE-10. The CORE-10 is a short, 10 item version of the CORE-OM, a standard measure of psychological distress
Change in general psychological functioning from Baseline to 1 Week
Discharge Satisfaction Questionnaire
기간: Post-treatment
The Discharge Satisfaction Questionnaire, (a standard service measure used within the MHOA CAG) will be completed by both the mindfulness and WLC group at post-intervention only to evaluate service satisfaction and the acceptability of the mindfulness intervention
Post-treatment

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

King's College London

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Rebecca Gould, PhD,DClinPsy, King's College London

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2016년 4월 1일

기본 완료 (예상)

2017년 3월 1일

연구 완료 (예상)

2017년 5월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2016년 8월 31일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2016년 9월 12일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 9월 16일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 9월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2016년 9월 12일

마지막으로 확인됨

2016년 4월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 16/LO/0223

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다