이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Impact of an Early Palliative Approach (MAHO2)

2019년 5월 15일 업데이트: Hopital Foch

Impact of an Early and Collegial Consideration of Patients' Vulnerability Comparing to Usual Care. Cluster Randomized Control Study "Mort-A-l'Hôpital 2"

In 2003, MAHO study (Ferrand E, Jabre P, Vincent-Genod C, et al. Circumstances of death in hospitalized patients and nurses' perceptions: French multicenter Mort-a-l'Hôpital survey. Arch Intern Med. 2008 168: 867-875.) evaluated the way 3793 patients died in 200 French hospitals and showed that their conditions of death were not optimal. The 22th April 2005 French Law precised patient's end of life rights with necessity to refrain from any unreasonable obstinacy, the right to refuse treatments and the obligation of a collegial process decision when the patient is not conscious. Since then, studies haven't demonstrate any improvement and found that palliative strategy in France is much less used than in other developed countries.

연구 개요

상세 설명

In 2003, MAHO study evaluated the way 3793 patients died en 200 French hospitals and showed that their conditions of death were not optimal. The 22th April 2005 French Law precised patient's end of life rights with necessity to refrain from any unreasonable obstinacy, the right to refuse treatments and the obligation of a collegial process decision when the patient is not conscious. Since then, studies haven't demonstrate any improvement and found that palliative strategy in France is much less used than in other developed countries.

Principal Objective: To evaluate the impact of an early palliative strategy using vulnerability criteria compared to standard care.

Primary endpoint: Rate of withdraw/withhold of treatment in each group.

Secondary objectives: To evaluate the impact of early recognition of patients' vulnerability on death conditions ; to evaluate this strategy impact according to unit type on length of stay, palliative strategy modalities and caregivers' satisfaction.

Secondary endpoints: Rate of therapeutic involvement reflections ; rate of death following withholding or withdrawing of treatments ; traceability of the level of therapeutic involvement process ; Rate of patients deceased with their relatives next to them ; rate of patients deceased with comfort treatment ; rate of palliative care consultation before death ; rate of asks for euthanasia ; Doctor and nurse's perception of quality of support and death process of the patient

Methods: Prospective, controlled, cluster randomized study of routine care 2 groups:

  • Group A: standard care and practice after 1 day of training
  • Group B: 1 day of training, learning the vulnerability criteria that should induce early thinking about level of therapeutic involvement; web accessed forms will be available to help collegial process, withhold and withdraw decisions traceability, using legal requirements Number of patients to include: To detect a 20% absolute difference in palliative strategy used (30 to 50%), we determined that 5040 patients would provide a power of 80% with the use of a two-sided alpha level of 0.05. Sequential analysis is planned in order to early stop the study in case of efficacy or futility (minimal inclusion: 500 patients)

Inclusion criteria:

All patients hospitalized with at least one of the following vulnerability criteria will be included:

  • Evolutive and symptomatic incurable cancer
  • Aged more than 75 years old and presenting several geriatric syndromes (cognitive disorders, isolation, malnutrition, bedridden more than 12h per day)
  • Neurologic pathology, chronic, with loss of autonomy (Performance Status>3)
  • Final organ failure (heart, lungs, liver, kidney) with loss of autonomy (Performance Status>3)
  • Care refusal and/or expressed will to die or repeated request for help to die

Exclusion criteria:

  • Minors
  • Patients without indication for treatment or surveillance with length of stay inferior to 24h
  • Brain dead patients
  • Not consent patients

Duration: 37 months (28 inclusion months for each center and a follow-up to hospital discharge, death or 9 months if the patient is still hospitalized).

Number of participating centers: 20 centers (28 services) were selected and recruit after training program among centers that did not used a formalized process to initiate level of therapeutic involvement reflection.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (예상)

1200

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Amiens, 프랑스, 80000
        • CHU
      • Antony, 프랑스, 92160
        • Hopital privé Oncologie Médicale
      • Antony, 프랑스, 92160
        • Hôpital Privé Medecine interne
      • Bobigny, 프랑스, 93000
        • Hôpital Avicenne
      • Boulogne Billancourt, 프랑스, 92100
        • Hôpital Ambroise Paré
      • Champcueil, 프랑스, 91750
        • Hôpital Georges Clemenceau
      • Dijon, 프랑스, 21000
        • CHU
      • Epernay, 프랑스, 51200
        • Centre hospitalier
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre, 프랑스, 94270
        • Hopital Bicetre
      • Lille, 프랑스, 59000
        • CHRU
      • Paris, 프랑스, 75010
        • Hopital Lariboisiere Medecine interne
      • Paris, 프랑스, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris - Saint-Joseph
      • Paris, 프랑스, 75014
        • Hopital Cochin Gastro-Enterologie
      • Poitiers, 프랑스, 86000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
      • Roubaix, 프랑스, 59100
        • Centre hospitalier
      • Soissons, 프랑스, 02200
        • Centre Hospitalier de Soissons
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hiopital Foch Néphrologie
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hopital Foch Cardiologie
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hopital Foch Chirurgie Urologique
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hopital Foch Médecine Interne
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hopital Foch Neurochirurgie
      • Suresnes, 프랑스, 92150
        • Hopîtal Foch Urgences
      • Valenciennes, 프랑스, 59300
        • CH

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient more than 18 years old hospitalized for at least 24h and who's prognosis (survival or quality of life) should lead to a palliative approach
  • Patient suffering with at least one of the following vulnerability criteria will be included:

    • Evolutive and symptomatic incurable cancer
    • Aged more than 75 years old and presenting several geriatric syndromes (cognitive disorders, isolation, malnutrition, bedridden more than 12h per day)
    • Neurologic pathology, chronic, with loss of autonomy (Performance Status>3)
    • Final organ failure (heart, lungs, liver, kidney) with loss of autonomy (Performance Status>3)
    • Care refusal and/or expressed will to die or repeated request for help to die
  • No opposition to the use of data collected from the patient or a relative or inclusion in emergency and non-opposition collected offline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors
  • Patients without indication for treatment or surveillance with length of stay inferior to 24h
  • Brain dead patients
  • Not consent patients

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
다른: Usual Practices
the centres applies their usual practices
다른: Early consideration of vulnerability
Strategy promoting early consideration of patients' vulnerability
One day training with the provision of vulnerability criteria inciting an early reflection of the level of therapeutic engagement; sheets available on the internet computer support collegial reflection and traceability of decisions to limit and stop treatments, incorporating the provisions of law known Leonetti

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Rate of withdraw/withhold of treatment in each group
기간: From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
To evaluate the impact of an early palliative strategy using vulnerability criteria compared to standard care.
From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Death conditions
기간: From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital

rate of death relied to a withholding/withdrawing treatment decision, rate relatives present at the time of death, rate of death with comfort drugs, rate of patient/family/relatives interview with a psychologist.

rate of death relied to a withholding/withdrawing treatment decision, rate relatives present at the time of death, rate of death with comfort drugs, rate of patient/family/relatives interview with a psychologist.

From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
Early vulnerability consideration impact on length of stay
기간: From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
total length of stay in the hospital
From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
Palliative strategy modalities
기간: From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
rate of reflections on level of therapeutic involvement
From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
Early vulnerability consideration impact on caregivers' satisfaction
기간: From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital
Physician and nurses' perceptions about care management and conditions of death, caregivers interview with a psychologist
From hospital admission to death or discharge or 9 months after inclusion if the patient is still in the hospital

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Edouard Ferrand, MD, e.ferrand@hopital-foch.org

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2013년 11월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2019년 3월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2019년 3월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2016년 2월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2016년 9월 19일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2016년 9월 20일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 5월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2019년 5월 15일

마지막으로 확인됨

2019년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2013/99
  • 2012-A00444-39 (기타 식별자: ANSM)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다