이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Postural Exercises in Women With Fibromyalgia

2018년 4월 3일 업데이트: Marta Inglés de la Torre, University of Valencia

Study of the Effect of a Postural Exercise Program in Women With Fibromyalgia: a Randomized Clinical Trial

In the current study, the investigators aimed to study:

  • The proprioception status of patients with FMS.
  • The effectiveness of a postural exercise program in women with fibromyalgia for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week), compared to a low impact aerobic exercise program on different parameters, such as proprioception, balance, muscle strength, flexibility and joint range.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a multisystemic disease, characterized by generalized chronic musculoskeletal pain. In addition, it is usually accompanied by fatigue, sleep disorders, morning stiffness, cognitive disorders, depression, anxiety and stress. Other common symptoms are back pain, headaches, irritable bowel, balance problems and deterioration of physical function.

It constitutes the second most common rheumatic 36 disorder after osteoarthritis, with a prevalence of 2.9% in Europe and a fivefold times greater incidence among women than men.

Patients with FMS have pain at specific pressure points known as "tender points", with increased sensitivity to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and a decreased pain threshold (allodynia), in the absence of abnormalities in the biological or imaging tests. These tender points constitute the basis of the most sensitive and specific criteria for the diagnosis of the disease, this is, the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Accordingly, women presenting at least 11 of 18 tender points are diagnosed with FMS.

The etiology of FMS remains unclear. However, the generalized hyperalgesia, widespread pain and spontaneous pain in FMS have been related to central changes, and many studies support a major role for central sensitization in the generation of the symptoms of FMS.

Since it is a chronic disease, the care of this type of patients represents a significant economic burden. They have great health care resource requirements in both direct medical care and indirect costs of staff absenteeism. For these reasons, it is considered a major problem with a great impact on the health system, and therefore more and more studies are being developed with the aim of better understanding the pathophysiology of this disease.

In general, the goal of the treatment should be to improve function. In this regard, some studies have demonstrated the efficacy of low-cost therapeutic measures, such as physical exercise programs, to improve FMS symptoms. Physical exercise has a direct effect on pain, joint and muscle stiffness, generalized sensitivity fatigue, cognitive function. Since there is no standard program, it is difficult to determine which exercise modality is most effective on FMS. Most studies focus on low-impact aerobic exercise performed between 60-70% of maximal heart rate two to three times a week.

On the other hand, it has been proposed that motor control problems, due mainly to an alteration of the central and peripheral system, are associated with muscle strength loss, motor or sensory deficits and suboptimal muscle coordination. The lack of balance may also be due to a disturbance in the perception or interpretation of auditory- vestibular signals. Therefore, postural stability training is recommended to stimulate the neuromuscular system and develop proprioceptive capacity aimed at improving motor control and postural balance among these patients. In this regard, it is important to note that FMS is associated with postural control and balance impairments, the latter being one of the 10 most debilitating symptoms, with a prevalence of 45%.

In the current study, the investigators aimed to study:

  • The proprioception status of patients with FMS.
  • The effectiveness of a postural exercise program in women with fibromyalgia for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week), compared to a low impact aerobic exercise program on different parameters, such as proprioception, balance, muscle strength, flexibility and joint range.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

54

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

      • Valencia, 스페인, 46010
        • Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

30년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

연구 대상 성별

여성

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 30 and 65 years.
  • Meeting ACR 2010 criteria for FMS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindication for physical activity.
  • Deafness or limited hearing.
  • Vestibular disorders that compromise balance.
  • Low vision or blindness.
  • Psychotic disorder or cognitive impairment.
  • Decompensation or changes in medication.
  • Surgical interventions in the last six months.
  • Rheumatic disease.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 요인 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Experimental group 1
Low impact aerobic exercise group. 1hour, twice a week
The intervention will consist of working the muscles that are most affected by FMS through group exercises, which will be dynamic, fluid and aimed at improving functionality. Each session will consist of 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: warm up (15 minutes); games, group dynamics and aerobics (30 minutes); and cool down with stretching for 15 minutes.
실험적: Experimental group 2
Postural exercises group. 1hour, twice a week
The intervention will consist of performing postural exercises in prone, supine, sitting and standing position, as well as in quadrupedia. Each session will consist of 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: warm up (15 minutes); postural exercises (30 minutes); and cool down with stretching for 15 minutes.
간섭 없음: Control propriocepcion
No exercise, just proprioceptive control.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Proprioception
기간: 8 weeks
Proprioception will be evaluated at baseline and at the end of the study possible differences between women with fibromyalgia and healthy women using an isokinetic device (BIODEX MULTI-JOINT SYSTEM - PRO). The following movements were analized: knee (flexion, extension), hip (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction), ankle (flexion, extension), shoulder (flexion, extension). Joint position sense for knee extension and shoulder flexion will be also performed.
8 weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Balance
기간: 8 weeks
Evaluated by the Berg Balance Scale. This consists of 14 items, in which static and dynamic balance is assessed. Subjects are asked to perform balance related tasks of varying difficulties (from standing up from a sitting position to monopedal standing). According to the ability to carry out the assessed activity, each task is scored on a 5-point scale (0= lowest level of function, 4= highest level of function). The final measure is the sum of all the scores (maximum=56 points) and higher scores are indicative of greater functional balance. This test has shown excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91).
8 weeks
Handgrip strength
기간: 8 weeks
Grip strength will be measured by a Jamar Analogue Hand Dynamometer with participants seated, their elbow by their side and flexed to right angles, and a neutral wrist position. Subjects were verbally encouraged to produce their maximal grip strength (MGS). Three trials were recorded, consisting of a 3-second maximal contraction, with a 30-second rest period between each trial. The maximal value of the three reproducible trials for each hand was retained for analyses.
8 weeks
Joint range of motion
기간: 8 weeks
Ranges of movement of different joints were evaluated by a goniometer and an inclinometer: Shoulder (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation), hip (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation), knee (flexion and extension), ankle (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation and external rotation), cervical spine (flexion, extension, rotations and inclinations). For the measurements, subjects were in underwear or wore comfortable clothes.
8 weeks
Pain
기간: 8 weeks

Evaluated by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The MPQ includes 4 main measures:

  1. Pain location. On a drawing of the human body with both anterior and posterior sides, participants indicate the areas of their bodies that have pain. The number of pain sites is summed as in indicator of the sensory pain dimension.
  2. Pain intensity. From a list of 6 words, the patient selects the one best word describing the intensity of pain: 0 = none, 1= mild, 2 = discomforting, 3 = distressing, 4 = horrible and 5 = excruciating.
  3. Pain quality. Participants respond to the question, "What does your pain feel like?" by selecting from 78 descriptors in 20 subclasses. The quantitative data is summed to form the Pain Rating Index (PRI) (score 0 no pain- 78 worst possible pain).
  4. Pain pattern. Participants respond to the question, "How does your pain change with time?" by selecting from 9 words.
8 weeks
Leisure Time Physical Activity
기간: 8 weeks
Evaluated by the Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument (LTPAI). It is an instrument assessing the amount of physical activity performed during a typical week. The physical activities are divided into three categories: light, moderate, and heavy activities. The LTPAI total score is the sum of hours in all three categories.
8 weeks
Impact on quality of life
기간: 8 weeks
Evaluated by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). This is a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire with 10 items that evaluates the status of the patient the week before the test is completed, and it assesses the aspects that tend to be more affected in people with FMS. The first item contains 10 sub-items, ranging from four points (from 0= always to 3 = never) and assesses the patient's functional capacity in activities of daily living. The second and third items refer to days of the week and the rest are visual analog scales from 0 to 10. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the maximal functional capacity quality of life and 100 the minimum. This scale was validated in its Spanish version by Salgueiro and García-Leiva in 2013, and it showed an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95).
8 weeks
Anxiety and Depression
기간: 8 weeks
Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). This is a valid and reliable self-rating scale with 14 items that measures anxiety and depression (7 of the items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression). Each item is answered by the patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression, with scores categorized as follows: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. Scores for the entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
8 weeks
Fatigue
기간: 8 weeks
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS is a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items (questions) investigating the severity of fatigue in different situations during the past week. Grading of each item ranges from 1 to 7, where 1 indicates strong disagreement and 7 strong agreement, and the final score represents the mean value of the 9 items.
8 weeks
Sleep disorders
기간: 8 weeks
Evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating 7 components that produce one global score. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality.
8 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Marta Inglés, PhD, Faculty of Physiotherapy. University of Valencia

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2017년 9월 4일

기본 완료 (실제)

2017년 11월 10일

연구 완료 (실제)

2017년 12월 29일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2017년 5월 23일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2017년 5월 23일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 5월 25일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 4월 4일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2018년 4월 3일

마지막으로 확인됨

2018년 4월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다