- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT03659591
Triple Aim Psychotherapy: Aimed at Improving Patient Experience, Population Health, and Cost (TAP)
Triple Aim Psychotherapy: an RCT Comparing Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) to Adaptive Psychological Training (APT) - a Treatment Aimed at Improving Patient Experience, Population Health, and Cost-effectiveness
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent in the general population. Community mental health programs in publically-funded jurisdictions such as Canada often have relatively limited, fixed budgets in order to provide services, which can result in inadequate access to effective treatment for patients. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is a gold-standard psychotherapeutic treatment for depression and anxiety. In order to improve access to treatment, community mental healthcare settings often provide CBT in a group format for patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms. However, typical protocols for delivering group CBT in a community setting nonetheless require a considerable investment of limited clinician time.
The question arises as to whether this is the most efficient and effective use of clinician time; in other words, per hour spent of clinician time, does this approach maximize the number of patients experiencing adequate and meaningful clinical improvement? The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the Triple Aim, which is a framework describing an approach to optimizing health system performance by simultaneously pursuing three dimensions, namely improving the patient experience of care; improving the health of populations; and reducing the associated per capita costs of care. Studies of psychotherapy rarely pursue all three of these dimensions simultaneously. Efforts to achieve the best clinical outcome for an individual often lead to restrictive inclusionary/exclusionary criteria that sacrifice reaching the wider population; conversely, efforts to improve population health often prioritize composite overall clinical improvement across an entire group, even though the change experienced by many of the individuals in the population might not be clinically meaningful; focusing primarily on cost-effectiveness often sacrifices the individual's experience and/or the population's needs.
Adaptive Psychological Training (APT) is a group-based psychotherapy designed with all of the dimensions of the Triple Aim in mind simultaneously. In its development, APT drew heavily upon Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, an evidence-based psychotherapy that itself draws upon both evidence-based eastern psychotherapeutic practices and CBT, but APT also drew upon other evidence-based and evidence-supported psychotherapies including interpersonal and relational approaches, as well as meaning-focused psychoanalytic models. It also drew from psychology and neuroscience more broadly, as well as from learning theory and from practical clinical and operational experience. Inclusion/exclusion criteria, group size, number of sessions, in-session practice and learning, and between-session practice and learning were all adapted from the perspective of trying to achieve high quality outcomes for a broader population within more contained costs, and thereby increase access to quality care.
To-date, APT has already demonstrated positive outcomes in pilot research and in community clinical settings. The purpose of this specific study is to determine whether for a given population of patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, APT can facilitate meaningful change for more patients per time spent by clinicians than can CBT (the gold standard). The significance of this study includes its potential contribution to determining how best to deploy the limited resource of clinician time in a community setting in order to best help the most people.
연구 유형
등록 (예상)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Ontario
-
Burlington, Ontario, 캐나다, L7S OA2
- Joseph Brant Hospital
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Treatment-seeking adults, interested and willing to participate in group psychotherapy
- Mild-to-moderate depressive (score of ≥10 and <20 on PHQ9) and/or anxious (score of ≥8 and <15 on GAD7) symptoms
- Ability to communicate, in written and spoken English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe depressive/anxious symptoms
- Patients where the primary clinical focus is active suicidality or harm-to-others, psychosis, mania, substance use, posttraumatic stress, or personality pathology such that it would interfere with group function
- Recent course(s) of the study psychotherapies
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 치료
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
10 week, manual-based group CBT treatment for depression and anxiety, followed by optional booster sessions
|
CBT will be delivered in group format, consisting of 10 weekly two-hour sessions, with 10 participants per group
다른 이름들:
|
|
활성 비교기: Adaptive Psychological Training
5 week, manual-based group APT treatment for depression and anxiety, followed by optional booster sessions
|
APT will be delivered in group format, consisting of 5 weekly two-hour sessions, with 20 participants per group
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Triple Aim Measure
기간: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
Numerator: The number of patients achieving reliable recovery; denominator: clinician time spent in hours ('reliable recovery' is defined as scores below 'caseness' for both depression [<10 on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] and anxiety [<8 on Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)], with any change from above caseness to below caseness meeting the threshold of the Reliable Change Index)
|
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Triple Aim Measure - recovery only
기간: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
Triple Aim Composite Score (as above), but without the Reliable Change Index requirement
|
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
|
Triple Aim Measure - improvement only
기간: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
Triple Aim Composite Score (as above), but without the remission requirement
|
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline - depressive symptoms
기간: Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
|
Scale used to measure depressive symptoms is the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); score ranges from 0-27, where higher values indicate more depressive symptoms (worse outcome)
|
Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline - anxiety symptoms
기간: Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
|
Scale used to measure anxiety symptoms is the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale; score ranges from 0-21, where higher values indicate more anxiety symptoms (worse outcome)
|
Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline - function
기간: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
Scale used to measure function is the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 - 12 item version (WHODAS 2.0 12-item); score ranges from 0-48, where higher values indicate lower functioning (worse outcome)
|
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline - mental wellbeing
기간: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
Scale used to measure mental wellbeing is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS); score ranges from 14-70, where higher values indicate greater mental wellbeing (better outcome)
|
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
|
Change from baseline - self-compassion
기간: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
Scale used to measure self-compassion is the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF); score ranges from 12-60, where higher values indicate greater self-compassion (better outcome)
|
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Steven Selchen, MD MSt FRCPC, Joseph Brant Hospital
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (예상)
기본 완료 (예상)
연구 완료 (예상)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 000-044-18
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .