Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Triple Aim Psychotherapy: Aimed at Improving Patient Experience, Population Health, and Cost (TAP)

3 de septiembre de 2018 actualizado por: Dr. Steven Selchen, Joseph Brant Hospital

Triple Aim Psychotherapy: an RCT Comparing Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) to Adaptive Psychological Training (APT) - a Treatment Aimed at Improving Patient Experience, Population Health, and Cost-effectiveness

Community mental health programs in publically-funded jurisdictions such as Canada often have limited budgets in order to provide services, which can result in inadequate access to effective treatment for patients. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is a gold-standard psychotherapy for depression and anxiety. In order to improve access to treatment, community mental healthcare settings often provide CBT in a group format for patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms. However, typical protocols for delivering group CBT in a community setting nonetheless require a considerable investment of limited clinician time. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the Triple Aim, which is a framework describing an approach to optimizing health system performance by simultaneously pursuing three dimensions, namely improving the patient experience of care; improving the health of populations; and reducing the associated per capita costs of care. Adaptive Psychological Training (APT) is a group-based psychotherapy designed with all of the dimensions of the Triple Aim in mind simultaneously. In its development, APT drew heavily upon mindfulness-based approaches. To-date, APT has already demonstrated positive outcomes in pilot research and in community clinical settings. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether for a given population of patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, APT can facilitate meaningful change for more patients per time spent by clinicians than can CBT.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent in the general population. Community mental health programs in publically-funded jurisdictions such as Canada often have relatively limited, fixed budgets in order to provide services, which can result in inadequate access to effective treatment for patients. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is a gold-standard psychotherapeutic treatment for depression and anxiety. In order to improve access to treatment, community mental healthcare settings often provide CBT in a group format for patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms. However, typical protocols for delivering group CBT in a community setting nonetheless require a considerable investment of limited clinician time.

The question arises as to whether this is the most efficient and effective use of clinician time; in other words, per hour spent of clinician time, does this approach maximize the number of patients experiencing adequate and meaningful clinical improvement? The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) developed the Triple Aim, which is a framework describing an approach to optimizing health system performance by simultaneously pursuing three dimensions, namely improving the patient experience of care; improving the health of populations; and reducing the associated per capita costs of care. Studies of psychotherapy rarely pursue all three of these dimensions simultaneously. Efforts to achieve the best clinical outcome for an individual often lead to restrictive inclusionary/exclusionary criteria that sacrifice reaching the wider population; conversely, efforts to improve population health often prioritize composite overall clinical improvement across an entire group, even though the change experienced by many of the individuals in the population might not be clinically meaningful; focusing primarily on cost-effectiveness often sacrifices the individual's experience and/or the population's needs.

Adaptive Psychological Training (APT) is a group-based psychotherapy designed with all of the dimensions of the Triple Aim in mind simultaneously. In its development, APT drew heavily upon Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, an evidence-based psychotherapy that itself draws upon both evidence-based eastern psychotherapeutic practices and CBT, but APT also drew upon other evidence-based and evidence-supported psychotherapies including interpersonal and relational approaches, as well as meaning-focused psychoanalytic models. It also drew from psychology and neuroscience more broadly, as well as from learning theory and from practical clinical and operational experience. Inclusion/exclusion criteria, group size, number of sessions, in-session practice and learning, and between-session practice and learning were all adapted from the perspective of trying to achieve high quality outcomes for a broader population within more contained costs, and thereby increase access to quality care.

To-date, APT has already demonstrated positive outcomes in pilot research and in community clinical settings. The purpose of this specific study is to determine whether for a given population of patients experiencing mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, APT can facilitate meaningful change for more patients per time spent by clinicians than can CBT (the gold standard). The significance of this study includes its potential contribution to determining how best to deploy the limited resource of clinician time in a community setting in order to best help the most people.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Anticipado)

80

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Ontario
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canadá, L7S OA2
        • Joseph Brant Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment-seeking adults, interested and willing to participate in group psychotherapy
  • Mild-to-moderate depressive (score of ≥10 and <20 on PHQ9) and/or anxious (score of ≥8 and <15 on GAD7) symptoms
  • Ability to communicate, in written and spoken English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe depressive/anxious symptoms
  • Patients where the primary clinical focus is active suicidality or harm-to-others, psychosis, mania, substance use, posttraumatic stress, or personality pathology such that it would interfere with group function
  • Recent course(s) of the study psychotherapies

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
10 week, manual-based group CBT treatment for depression and anxiety, followed by optional booster sessions
CBT will be delivered in group format, consisting of 10 weekly two-hour sessions, with 10 participants per group
Otros nombres:
  • TCC
Comparador activo: Adaptive Psychological Training
5 week, manual-based group APT treatment for depression and anxiety, followed by optional booster sessions
APT will be delivered in group format, consisting of 5 weekly two-hour sessions, with 20 participants per group
Otros nombres:
  • APTO

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Triple Aim Measure
Periodo de tiempo: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
Numerator: The number of patients achieving reliable recovery; denominator: clinician time spent in hours ('reliable recovery' is defined as scores below 'caseness' for both depression [<10 on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] and anxiety [<8 on Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)], with any change from above caseness to below caseness meeting the threshold of the Reliable Change Index)
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Triple Aim Measure - recovery only
Periodo de tiempo: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
Triple Aim Composite Score (as above), but without the Reliable Change Index requirement
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
Triple Aim Measure - improvement only
Periodo de tiempo: At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
Triple Aim Composite Score (as above), but without the remission requirement
At 10 weeks; in a secondary fashion, this outcome will also be examined every two weeks across 6 months
Change from baseline - depressive symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
Scale used to measure depressive symptoms is the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); score ranges from 0-27, where higher values indicate more depressive symptoms (worse outcome)
Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
Change from baseline - anxiety symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
Scale used to measure anxiety symptoms is the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale; score ranges from 0-21, where higher values indicate more anxiety symptoms (worse outcome)
Pre- (week 0) and repeated every two weeks across 6 months
Change from baseline - function
Periodo de tiempo: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
Scale used to measure function is the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 - 12 item version (WHODAS 2.0 12-item); score ranges from 0-48, where higher values indicate lower functioning (worse outcome)
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
Change from baseline - mental wellbeing
Periodo de tiempo: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
Scale used to measure mental wellbeing is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS); score ranges from 14-70, where higher values indicate greater mental wellbeing (better outcome)
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
Change from baseline - self-compassion
Periodo de tiempo: Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months
Scale used to measure self-compassion is the Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form (SCS-SF); score ranges from 12-60, where higher values indicate greater self-compassion (better outcome)
Pre- (week 0) and repeated monthly across 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Steven Selchen, MD MSt FRCPC, Joseph Brant Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de septiembre de 2018

Finalización primaria (Anticipado)

1 de agosto de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de noviembre de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de agosto de 2018

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de septiembre de 2018

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

6 de septiembre de 2018

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

6 de septiembre de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de septiembre de 2018

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 000-044-18

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir