이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Effect of Sport Education in University Required PE on Students' Perceived Physical Literacy and Physical Activity Level

2022년 7월 1일 업데이트: Choi Siu Ming, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Effect of Sport Education Intervention in University Required Physical Education: Cluster Randomized Trial of Students' Perceived Physical Literacy and Physical Activity Levels

This project examines the effects of implementing sport education model in university required physical education lessons on perceived physical literacy and physical activity levels of the students.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Scholars suggested the practical application of sport education could operationalize physical literacy that some features of this pedagogical model are positively associated to the development and attributes of physical literacy. However, there is no further supplement on the curriculum and pedagogical method for physical educators to develop students as physically literate individuals. Compared to primary school students and adolescents, university students are at the stage of transition from compulsory physical education in secondary school to more self-initiated physical lifestyle in adulthood. It is therefore important that they develop physical literacy as well as a positive attitude towards physical activity. Unfortunately, despite its importance, physical literacy among university students is insufficiently investigated. In view of the above, this study employs a cluster randomized trial design to examine the effectiveness of sport education model delivered in the required physical education lessons at the university level to eligible students. The investigation focuses on the pre- and post-test and follow-up difference to see whether there are differences on perceived motivational climate, situational motivation, and their corresponding outcome of perceived PL, PA enjoyment and, self-report and objective PA levels. Also, this study investigates the fitness instruction time by videotaping and coding during every PE lesson from both groups. This study would be significant that the findings could establish the importance on physical literacy development through sport education model as well as develop students' physical literacy and positive attitude towards physical activity.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

410

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

  • 홍콩
      • Hong Kong, 홍콩
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical education classes: universities in Hong Kong which are funded by the University Grants Committee and provides required PE lessons.
  • Lecturers: graduated from master's degree or above, more than 5 years of teaching experience, in addition with the attendance of 12-hour continuing professional development workshop on Sport Education curriculum.
  • Students: aged 18 or above, enrolled in 1-credit required physical education lessons and indicated all statements negatively in the self-screening Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2017).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • did not wish to participate;
  • have currently used their own wearable activity tracker;
  • indicated any major physical, psychiatric, or cardiovascular-related problems diagnosed by a physician.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Sport Education Group
Participants participated in the required physical education lessons which were delivered in a season of sport education model for 10 lessons.
행동: Sport Education Model
A total number of 25 lecturers participated in the 12-hour CPD workshop on Sport Education curriculum on June 2018. The content of the workshop focused on the development of a Sport Education season, the changing roles of teachers and students, the assessment of personal and social responsibility, and the application of sport education season and related pedagogies on handball, badminton, swimming and physical conditioning. The Sport Education courseware and class materials were then designed by the eligible lecturers. The intervention was lasted for 10-lesson, 1-day per week and the duration for each lesson was around 90 minutes. The specific five phases in Sport Education model of team selection, teacher-directed, pre-season, formal competition and cumulating event were included. The eligible lecturers led the lessons according to the designated course wares and lesson plans for each sport.
간섭 없음: Control Group
Participants received no intervention treatment. They were asked to attend in normal physical education classes for the same period of time.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Self-report Physical Activity Levels
기간: Change from Baseline Self-report Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
The globally standardized and validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form was used to measure self-reported physical activity levels. Four generic items of vigorous, moderate, walking and sitting were included to obtain the physical activity levels from the participants. Example items included: During the last 7 days, on how many days did you do vigorous physical activities like heavy lifting, digging, aerobics, or fast bicycling (vigorous)? They are required to answer the total duration of different types of physical activity which was at least 10 uninterrupted minutes in the last 7 days. The following values continue to be used for the analysis: Walking = 3.3 METs, Moderate PA = 4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. The metabolic equivalent minutes/ week (MET-minutes/week) was calculated by this formula: 8 * vigorous-intensity activity minutes * days + 4 * moderate-intensity activity minutes * days + 3.3 * walking-intensity activity minutes * days.
Change from Baseline Self-report Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
Objective Physical Activity Levels
기간: Change from Baseline Objective Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
The accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+) will be used in this study to measure the dynamic range from -6 to +6 with 3 axes and 3mg/ LSB of sensitivity. A sub-sample of 64 participants was randomly selected to wear accelerometers to measure their objective physical activity levels for at least 8 hours per day, in 7 consecutive days (ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA). The data will be uploaded onto the computer and analyzed by ActiLife 6 software. Only 47 of their data were analyzed because the participants met the eligibility of wearing at least 8 hours per day in at least 5 days. Participants' objective physical activity levels will be categorized as sedentary, light, moderate or vigorous. Accordingly, metabolic equivalents were calculated automatically in its software that a higher value represents a better outcome.
Change from Baseline Objective Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Motivational Climate
기간: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The 34-item Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in Physical Education was based on achievement goal theory and self-determination theory to assess students' perception of the motivational climate of empowering and disempowering features created by their physical education teachers. Participants responded to the instrument on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The total subscale score range was 17 - 85 that higher values represent a better outcome in the empowering subscale and vice versa for the disempowering. Milton et al. (2018) clarified the questionnaire is internally consistent (α = 0.82 - 0.91) and factorial and construct validity. The empowering and disempowering scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Situational Motivation
기간: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Situational Motivation Scale was used to measure participants' situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation while performing given physical activities. Participants responded to the instrument on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true and 7 = very true). The total subscale score range was 4 - 28 that higher values represent a better outcome for all subscales. Example items include: (a) this activity is fun (intrinsic motivation); (b) I believe this activity is important for me (identified regulation); (c) I don't have any choice (external regulation); and (d) I do this activity, but I am not sure it is a good thing to pursue it (amotivation). It illustrated that it has adequate internal consistency (α = 0.77-0.95) and construct validity in physical activity settings among college students aged from 18 - 22 years (mean age = 18.9). The motivational spectrum scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Perceived Physical Literacy
기간: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument is a 9-item instrument which is used to measure both teachers' and adolescents' perceived physical literacy. Participants responded to the instrument on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The total subscale score range was 3 - 15 that higher values represent a better outcome for all subscales. Example statements include: (a) I am physically fit, in accordance with my age (sense of self and self-confidence); (b) I have strong social skills (self-expression and communication with others); (c) I am aware of the benefits of sports related to health (knowledge and understanding). The scale scores are reliable with the internal consistency from .73 to .76. The scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Physical Activity Enjoyment
기간: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale is designed to measure how much a student enjoys participating in physical activity. Participants responded to the 16-items instrument on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree a lot and 5 = agree a lot). The total subscale score range was 9 - 45 for positive and 7 - 35 for negative that higher values represent a better outcome in the positive subscale and vice versa for the negative. There are nine positive items such as "I find it pleasurable", "It gives me energy" and seven negative items such as "I dislike it", "It is not fun at all". Participants receive high scores on positive items and low scores on negative items would indicate a high enjoyment of physical activity. Motl et al. (2001) established adequate internal consistency (α = 0.81-0.86), and factorial and construct validity. The positive and negative scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Fitness Instruction Time of Physical Education Lessons
기간: The 1st lesson (Baseline) to the 10th lesson (11th week)
The Fitness instruction time was measured using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT; McKenzie et al., 1992) which is a validated and reliable momentary time sampling and interval observation instrument to gather quantitative data for assessing physical activity during PE lessons. SOFIT includes three intensities of students' physical activity levels, lesson context, and teacher behavior. Each category is coded using interval coding every 20 seconds (10 seconds observe; 10 seconds record) throughout the lesson. The observer decides on what is occurring at the moment an observation interval ends. Physical activity level, lesson content, and teacher behavior were measured as a percentage of physical education lesson time. Each outcome measure was then measured by averaging the percentage of physical education lesson time across the first to the tenth lesson.
The 1st lesson (Baseline) to the 10th lesson (11th week)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

Chinese University of Hong Kong

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Kim Wai Raymond Sum, EdD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • 수석 연구원: Siu Ming Choi, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2019년 1월 7일

기본 완료 (실제)

2019년 4월 18일

연구 완료 (실제)

2019년 4월 18일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2019년 3월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2019년 3월 21일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2019년 3월 25일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2022년 7월 18일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2022년 7월 1일

마지막으로 확인됨

2022년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

키워드

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • CSMing

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

IPD 공유 기간

The data will be provided after publication for 6 months.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available publicly.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다