Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Effect of Sport Education in University Required PE on Students' Perceived Physical Literacy and Physical Activity Level

1 luglio 2022 aggiornato da: Choi Siu Ming, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Effect of Sport Education Intervention in University Required Physical Education: Cluster Randomized Trial of Students' Perceived Physical Literacy and Physical Activity Levels

This project examines the effects of implementing sport education model in university required physical education lessons on perceived physical literacy and physical activity levels of the students.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Scholars suggested the practical application of sport education could operationalize physical literacy that some features of this pedagogical model are positively associated to the development and attributes of physical literacy. However, there is no further supplement on the curriculum and pedagogical method for physical educators to develop students as physically literate individuals. Compared to primary school students and adolescents, university students are at the stage of transition from compulsory physical education in secondary school to more self-initiated physical lifestyle in adulthood. It is therefore important that they develop physical literacy as well as a positive attitude towards physical activity. Unfortunately, despite its importance, physical literacy among university students is insufficiently investigated. In view of the above, this study employs a cluster randomized trial design to examine the effectiveness of sport education model delivered in the required physical education lessons at the university level to eligible students. The investigation focuses on the pre- and post-test and follow-up difference to see whether there are differences on perceived motivational climate, situational motivation, and their corresponding outcome of perceived PL, PA enjoyment and, self-report and objective PA levels. Also, this study investigates the fitness instruction time by videotaping and coding during every PE lesson from both groups. This study would be significant that the findings could establish the importance on physical literacy development through sport education model as well as develop students' physical literacy and positive attitude towards physical activity.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

410

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical education classes: universities in Hong Kong which are funded by the University Grants Committee and provides required PE lessons.
  • Lecturers: graduated from master's degree or above, more than 5 years of teaching experience, in addition with the attendance of 12-hour continuing professional development workshop on Sport Education curriculum.
  • Students: aged 18 or above, enrolled in 1-credit required physical education lessons and indicated all statements negatively in the self-screening Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2017).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • did not wish to participate;
  • have currently used their own wearable activity tracker;
  • indicated any major physical, psychiatric, or cardiovascular-related problems diagnosed by a physician.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Sport Education Group
Participants participated in the required physical education lessons which were delivered in a season of sport education model for 10 lessons.
Comportamentale: Sport Education Model
A total number of 25 lecturers participated in the 12-hour CPD workshop on Sport Education curriculum on June 2018. The content of the workshop focused on the development of a Sport Education season, the changing roles of teachers and students, the assessment of personal and social responsibility, and the application of sport education season and related pedagogies on handball, badminton, swimming and physical conditioning. The Sport Education courseware and class materials were then designed by the eligible lecturers. The intervention was lasted for 10-lesson, 1-day per week and the duration for each lesson was around 90 minutes. The specific five phases in Sport Education model of team selection, teacher-directed, pre-season, formal competition and cumulating event were included. The eligible lecturers led the lessons according to the designated course wares and lesson plans for each sport.
Nessun intervento: Control Group
Participants received no intervention treatment. They were asked to attend in normal physical education classes for the same period of time.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Self-report Physical Activity Levels
Lasso di tempo: Change from Baseline Self-report Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
The globally standardized and validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form was used to measure self-reported physical activity levels. Four generic items of vigorous, moderate, walking and sitting were included to obtain the physical activity levels from the participants. Example items included: During the last 7 days, on how many days did you do vigorous physical activities like heavy lifting, digging, aerobics, or fast bicycling (vigorous)? They are required to answer the total duration of different types of physical activity which was at least 10 uninterrupted minutes in the last 7 days. The following values continue to be used for the analysis: Walking = 3.3 METs, Moderate PA = 4.0 METs and Vigorous PA = 8.0 METs. The metabolic equivalent minutes/ week (MET-minutes/week) was calculated by this formula: 8 * vigorous-intensity activity minutes * days + 4 * moderate-intensity activity minutes * days + 3.3 * walking-intensity activity minutes * days.
Change from Baseline Self-report Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
Objective Physical Activity Levels
Lasso di tempo: Change from Baseline Objective Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)
The accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+) will be used in this study to measure the dynamic range from -6 to +6 with 3 axes and 3mg/ LSB of sensitivity. A sub-sample of 64 participants was randomly selected to wear accelerometers to measure their objective physical activity levels for at least 8 hours per day, in 7 consecutive days (ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA). The data will be uploaded onto the computer and analyzed by ActiLife 6 software. Only 47 of their data were analyzed because the participants met the eligibility of wearing at least 8 hours per day in at least 5 days. Participants' objective physical activity levels will be categorized as sedentary, light, moderate or vigorous. Accordingly, metabolic equivalents were calculated automatically in its software that a higher value represents a better outcome.
Change from Baseline Objective Physical Activity Levels at the 10th lesson (11th week) and Follow-up at the 13th lesson (15th week)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Motivational Climate
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The 34-item Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire in Physical Education was based on achievement goal theory and self-determination theory to assess students' perception of the motivational climate of empowering and disempowering features created by their physical education teachers. Participants responded to the instrument on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The total subscale score range was 17 - 85 that higher values represent a better outcome in the empowering subscale and vice versa for the disempowering. Milton et al. (2018) clarified the questionnaire is internally consistent (α = 0.82 - 0.91) and factorial and construct validity. The empowering and disempowering scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Situational Motivation
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Situational Motivation Scale was used to measure participants' situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation while performing given physical activities. Participants responded to the instrument on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = not at all true and 7 = very true). The total subscale score range was 4 - 28 that higher values represent a better outcome for all subscales. Example items include: (a) this activity is fun (intrinsic motivation); (b) I believe this activity is important for me (identified regulation); (c) I don't have any choice (external regulation); and (d) I do this activity, but I am not sure it is a good thing to pursue it (amotivation). It illustrated that it has adequate internal consistency (α = 0.77-0.95) and construct validity in physical activity settings among college students aged from 18 - 22 years (mean age = 18.9). The motivational spectrum scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Perceived Physical Literacy
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument is a 9-item instrument which is used to measure both teachers' and adolescents' perceived physical literacy. Participants responded to the instrument on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The total subscale score range was 3 - 15 that higher values represent a better outcome for all subscales. Example statements include: (a) I am physically fit, in accordance with my age (sense of self and self-confidence); (b) I have strong social skills (self-expression and communication with others); (c) I am aware of the benefits of sports related to health (knowledge and understanding). The scale scores are reliable with the internal consistency from .73 to .76. The scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Physical Activity Enjoyment
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale is designed to measure how much a student enjoys participating in physical activity. Participants responded to the 16-items instrument on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = disagree a lot and 5 = agree a lot). The total subscale score range was 9 - 45 for positive and 7 - 35 for negative that higher values represent a better outcome in the positive subscale and vice versa for the negative. There are nine positive items such as "I find it pleasurable", "It gives me energy" and seven negative items such as "I dislike it", "It is not fun at all". Participants receive high scores on positive items and low scores on negative items would indicate a high enjoyment of physical activity. Motl et al. (2001) established adequate internal consistency (α = 0.81-0.86), and factorial and construct validity. The positive and negative scores were first summed up by their accordance item and the descriptive average scores were then calculated.
Baseline, 10th lesson (11th week) (Post-intervention) and 13th lesson (15th week) (Follow-up)
Fitness Instruction Time of Physical Education Lessons
Lasso di tempo: The 1st lesson (Baseline) to the 10th lesson (11th week)
The Fitness instruction time was measured using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT; McKenzie et al., 1992) which is a validated and reliable momentary time sampling and interval observation instrument to gather quantitative data for assessing physical activity during PE lessons. SOFIT includes three intensities of students' physical activity levels, lesson context, and teacher behavior. Each category is coded using interval coding every 20 seconds (10 seconds observe; 10 seconds record) throughout the lesson. The observer decides on what is occurring at the moment an observation interval ends. Physical activity level, lesson content, and teacher behavior were measured as a percentage of physical education lesson time. Each outcome measure was then measured by averaging the percentage of physical education lesson time across the first to the tenth lesson.
The 1st lesson (Baseline) to the 10th lesson (11th week)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Kim Wai Raymond Sum, EdD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Investigatore principale: Siu Ming Choi, PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

7 gennaio 2019

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

18 aprile 2019

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

18 aprile 2019

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 marzo 2019

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 marzo 2019

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

25 marzo 2019

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

18 luglio 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

1 luglio 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • CSMing

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

The data will be provided after publication for 6 months.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available publicly.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • CODICE_ANALITICO
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi