Campus Life Study: Harnessing Generativity Among Young Adults
2020년 2월 10일 업데이트: Marcie D. Haydon, MA, CPhil, University of California, Los Angeles
The Effects of Prosocial Writing on Psychological Well-being: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Young Adults
Recent research suggests that short, online interventions can enhance well-being, which is beneficial to both physical and mental health outcomes. Further, growing evidence suggests that prosocial behavior-a behavior that can be reliably manipulated through a short online intervention-may have beneficial effects on well-being and physical health. Giving support to others appears to be just as beneficial as receiving support, and asking people to perform kind acts for others over the course of several weeks, for example, has been shown to both increase well-being and reduce the inflammatory potential of immune cells.
The purpose of the current study is to test a novel 3-week, online prosocial writing-based intervention in a sample of young adults. Previous intervention studies have manipulated prosocial behavior by asking participants to perform tangible acts of kindness for others, such as writing a note to a coworker or helping a neighbor. However, providing this type of direct support can be logistically challenging and may contribute to increased feelings of distress in certain contexts. Writing interventions designed to elicit feelings of generativity offer one alternative approach, though they have yet to be tested among young adults.
Participants (n = 200) will be randomized to one of two conditions--peer helping or a facts-only control--and instructed to write about their experiences in their first-year at UCLA (freshman or first-year after transfer). Those in the peer helping will be asked to write for the benefit of a student who is about to begin their first year, whereas those in the facts-only control will not. In total, participants will complete 4 writing assignments, each on a separate day over the course of one week. Valid self-report measures will be assessed at pre-intervention, each writing session, post-intervention, and at the 2-week follow-up. The investigators expect participants in the peer helping condition to experience a greater increase in well-being (primary outcome) across the intervention and the follow-up when compared to the control condition. Secondary outcomes will include depressive symptoms, anxiety, loneliness, physical symptoms, social support, and generativity. As an exploratory aim, will also assess several moderators (i.e., psychological distress, prosocial tendencies, generativity) and mediators (i.e., fulfillment of psychological needs, positive affect) of the intervention effects.
연구 개요
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
165
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, 미국, 90095
- University of California, Los Angeles
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- enrolled in an upper-division psychology course
- 18 years of age or older
- fluent in English
- access to the internet and email
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 기초 과학
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Peer Helping Condition
Participants in the peer helping condition will be asked to write about their experiences in their first-year at UCLA (freshman or first-year after post-transfer), with an emphasis on using the experience to benefit someone who is about to be a first-year student.
|
After completing the baseline questionnaire, participants will be randomized to one of two conditions-a peer helping condition or a facts-only writing control.
Participants will receive general instructions for completing the writing sessions and will be asked to write for at least 5 minutes per session.
Topics covered in each session will vary and are related to common themes relating to life as a first-year university student (e.g., academics, adjusting to university, etc.).
Participants will be instructed not to worry about grammar, spelling, or sentence structure and reminded that their responses will remain anonymous.
Writing sessions (four in total) will be spaced 1 day apart and take place all within the same week.
|
|
활성 비교기: Facts-only Control
Participants in the facts-only writing condition will be asked to write facts about their experiences in their first-year at UCLA (freshman or first-year post-transfer).
Unlike the previous conditions, they will not be instructed to write for the benefit of another individual.
|
After completing the baseline questionnaire, participants will be randomized to one of two conditions-a peer helping condition or a facts-only writing control.
Participants will receive general instructions for completing the writing sessions and will be asked to write for at least 5 minutes per session.
Topics covered in each session will vary and are related to common themes relating to life as a first-year university student (e.g., academics, adjusting to university, etc.).
Participants will be instructed not to worry about grammar, spelling, or sentence structure and reminded that their responses will remain anonymous.
Writing sessions (four in total) will be spaced 1 day apart and take place all within the same week.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in psychological well-being
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Well-being within the past week will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up via the 14-item Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).
The MHC-SF is comprised of three empirically derived subscales: the 3-item Emotional Well-Being Subscale, the 6-item Psychological Well-Being Subscale, and the 5-item Social Well-Being Subscale.
Higher scores on each subscale, and the total score overall (range: 0-56), indicate greater well-being.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in depressive symptoms
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Depressive symptoms over the past week will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up via the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).
The CES-D is a measure of symptom severity, with higher scores (range: 0-60) indicating greater depressive symptoms.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in anxiety and worry
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Symptoms of anxiety over the past week will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up via the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7).
Higher scores on the GAD-7 (range: 0-21) indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Three additional items were added by the investigators to assess worry about vocational future: "I worry that I won't finish my degree," "I worry about what I will do after I finish my degree," and "I worry that I am not prepared for what comes after college (e.g., getting a job, graduate school)."
These items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater worry (range: 3-15).
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in loneliness
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Feelings of loneliness over the past week will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up via the 8-item UCLA Loneliness Scale- Short Form 8.
A higher overall score (range: 8-32) indicates greater feelings of loneliness.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in physical symptoms and health-care center visits
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Frequency of experiencing common physical symptoms (e.g., runny nose) over the past week will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up via a 13-item adapted version of the Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL).
This measure includes 10-items assessing physical symptoms (range: 0-70), such as headache, shortness of breath, and coughing/sore throat, and 3-items assessing overall feelings of sickness ("how many days have you been sick?") and healthcare utilization ("how many visits have you made to the student health center?").
Greater scores indicate more physical symptoms/feelings of illness.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in sleep disturbance
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Sleep disturbance over the past week will be measured using the 4-item PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up.
Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating more disturbance.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in social support
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Social support will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up using the 21-item 2-way Social Support Scale.
This scale measures 4 dimensions of social support: instrumental support received, instrumental support given, emotional support received, and emotional support given.
A higher total score (range: 0-105) indicates more feelings of perceived support.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in generativity
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Feelings of generativity will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, and the 2-week follow-up using the 13-item Generativity Scale.
This measure consists of two subscales: generative desire and generative achievement, with higher scores (range: 13-78) indicating greater desire/achievement.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in positive and negative affect
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Daily reports of positive and negative affect will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, the 2-week follow-up, and at each writing session using the 10-item positive affect subscale and 10-item negative affect subscales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-X).
Two additional adjectives were also included, happy and calm.
Greater scores indicate higher feelings of positive (range: 10-50) and negative affect (range: 10-50).
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
|
Change in fulfillment of psychological needs
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
Fulfillment of psychological needs will be measured at baseline, post-intervention, the 2-week follow-up, and at each writing session using the 9-item Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs.
This item has three subscales: autonomy, connectedness, and relatedness, with higher scores (range: 9-45) indicating greater needs satisfaction.
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins), at the post-intervention survey (2 days after the final writing assignment), and and at the 2-week follow-up
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Prosocial Tendencies (Moderator)
기간: At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins)
|
Frequency of engaging in prosocial acts will be measured at baseline using the 20-item Self-Report Altruism Scale.
Higher scores (range: 20-100) indicate more engagement in prosocial acts (e.g., helping a classmate with an assignment).
|
At the baseline survey (1 day before the intervention begins)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2020년 1월 6일
기본 완료 (실제)
2020년 2월 10일
연구 완료 (실제)
2020년 2월 10일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2019년 12월 13일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2019년 12월 18일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2019년 12월 23일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2020년 2월 12일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2020년 2월 10일
마지막으로 확인됨
2020년 2월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- IRB#19-002092
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .