- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT04940208
Chronic Pain in COVID-19 Patients Discharged From Intensive Care Unit
Chronic Pain in COVID-19 Patients Discharged From Intensive Care Unit - a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study
More than six million French were affected by SARS-COV2 epidemic. About 20% of infected peoples were hospitalized, and about 5% were admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) for severe SARS-COV2 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management.
A spectrum of neuropsychiatric sequelae, specific for the ICU exposure, was already described, including post-intensive care syndrome and persistent pain.
A growing body of evidence suggests the impact of SARS-COV2 exposure on the occurrence of neurological disorders and chronic pain syndrome development in COVID-19 patients.
Taking together, one can expect a large number of patients discharged from ICU after severe COVID-19 with high prevalence of persistent pain and psychological disorders. To date, no study has evaluated neither the incidence of persistant pains in ICU COVID-19 survivors, nor pain phenotypes.
The knowledge of such data is crucial in order to anticipate the management of such patients by specialized pain team, and to quantify the possible incurred burden of care.
Our study aims to evaluate the incidence of pain, pain localization and severity, associated pain-related psychological disorders, and to perform quantitative sensory testing in severe COVID-19 patients, admitted to the ICU for more than 48 hours and successfully discharged home during the first French pandemic wave.
연구 개요
상태
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
-
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 프랑스, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
- Hôpital Bicêtre AP-HP
-
Lyon, 프랑스, 69004
- Hôpital de la croix Rousse - Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
-
Hauts-de-Seine
-
Garches, Hauts-de-Seine, 프랑스, 92380
- Hôpital Raymond Poincaré - AP-HP
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- adults (>=18 y.o.)
- hospitalized in the ICU for at least 48 hours
- with SARS-Cov2 infection confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)/serology and/or a suggestive chest Computed Tomography scan
- during the first wave of COVID 19 from March to December 2020 at three investigator sites (2 in Paris and 1 in Lyon)
- discharged alive from the ICU
- at least 6 months after discharge
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal
- inability to communicate or to have in-person appointment
- death in the period from ICU discharge to the first phone call for interview
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 관찰 모델: 보병대
- 시간 관점: 단면
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
post COVID-19 ICU survivors
Patients hospitalized to the ICU in the context of severe COVID-19 and discharged alive during the first French COVID-19 pandemic wave
|
Patient-reported outcomes, listed in the Secondary Outcome Measure Section
Summation pain threshold test and Heat pain threshold skin test
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of secondary chronic pain
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Secondary chronic pain as defined by International Classification of Disease -11th revision (ICD-11). Chronic secondary pain is organized into the following six categories:
Any pain detected in the population of interest and fitting in one of 6 categories will be accounted. |
starting 6 month after discharge
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of different secondary chronic pain classes
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
as defined by ICD-11 and the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Chronic secondary pain is organized into the following six categories:
For each category of detected pain the frequency will be reported. |
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Pain sensitivity level
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Pain sensitivity level is tested with a Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ).
PSQ contains 17 items assessing pain with 11 level scoring from 0 (not at all painful) to 10 (most severe pain imaginable).
Maximal summation score is 170, higher score mean worse outcome.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Pain localization
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
A Michigan Body Map will be used for pain localization inventory.
A Michigan Body Map is a self-report measure to assess body areas where chronic pain is experienced.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
The severity of pain and its impact on functioning
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
A Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess the severity of pain and its impact on functioning.
The BPI pain scales defines pain as follows: Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain.
Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain.
Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain.
BPI Interference Items use 0 (less) to 10 (worth) scoring, the arithmetic mean of the interference items is used as a measure of pain interference, higher score mean worse outcome.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Neuropathic pain
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
A DN4 scale will be used to detect a neuropathic pain.
The DN4 (which stands for Douleur Neuropathique 4) is a clinician-administered questionnaire consisting of 10 items.
Seven items related to pain quality (i.e.
sensory and pain descriptors) are based on an interview with the patient and 3 items based on the clinical examination.
Each item has binary value (yes/no), maximal summation score is 10, and the threshold for neuropathic pain is 4.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Spiegel Sleep Quality Questionnaire
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Spiegel Sleep Questionnaire is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses the current sleep quality and disturbances.
It has six 5 point Likert-like items rated from worst to best value.
The total summation score is 30, less score values indicates worth outcome.
The threshold of bad sleep is less than 15, and the score 20 indicates a good sleep.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Respondents rate each item from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") to indicate the degree to which they have been bothered by that particular symptom over the past month. A total symptom severity score is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items. The score superior of 31 is indicative of probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. |
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Anxiety and Depression
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Hospital Anxiety Depression scale will be used, it measures anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression. Greater score values indicates worth outcome. For both scales, scores of less than 7 indicate non-cases; 8-10 - mild depression or anxiety; 11-14 - moderate depression or anxiety; and 15-21 - severe depression or anxiety. |
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Level
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale quantifies an individual's pain experience.
It has 13 items rated on 5-point Likert-like scales (0 - not at all to 4 - all the time).
A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52), the threshold above 30 is considered clinically relevant.
Higher score indicates higher level of catastrophizing and bad outcome.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Perceived Stress Level
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a self stress assessment instrument.
It has 10 items rated on 5-point Likert-like scales (0 - never to 4 - very often).
Individual scores on the PSS-10 can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Summation pain threshold
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
Mechanical temporal summation will be evoked using methodology described by Weissman-Fogel, 2008, by Von Frey Filaments, using a 180-gr filament that will be applied to the volar aspect of the dominant forearm.
Patients will be exposed to a single stimulus and will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using 11 items numeric pain scale.
This pain score serve as an index for mechanical suprathreshold pain.
Subsequently, 1 Hz repetitive stimuli will be applied within an area of 1 cm in diameter, using the same filament, and subjects will be asked to rate the pain intensity of the last stimulus.
The magnitude of mechanical temporal summation will be calculated as the difference between the last and the first pain scores.
Higher values indicates worth outcome.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
|
Heat pain threshold
기간: starting 6 month after discharge
|
A heat pain threshold will be realized using Thermal Stimulator for Sensory testing (SOMEDIC(R)).
A thermode (heating stick) of 7 square centimeters will be applied to the volar aspect of the dominant forearm.
Patients will be exposed to 3 repetitive gradual increase in temperature from 32° to 52°C.
The skin contact will be withdrawn if an individual is not able to tolerate such stimulation, and the temperature threshold of tolerance will be noted.
The final reading will be the median of three measurements, higher values indicate better tolerance.
|
starting 6 month after discharge
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Carfi A, Bernabei R, Landi F; Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):603-605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603.
- Needham EJ, Chou SH, Coles AJ, Menon DK. Neurological Implications of COVID-19 Infections. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Jun;32(3):667-671. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00978-4.
- Asadi-Pooya AA, Simani L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020 Jun 15;413:116832. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116832. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
- Lee AM, Wong JG, McAlonan GM, Cheung V, Cheung C, Sham PC, Chu CM, Wong PC, Tsang KW, Chua SE. Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;52(4):233-40. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200405.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 2020-A02929-30
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .