Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Chronic Pain in COVID-19 Patients Discharged From Intensive Care Unit

1 febbraio 2022 aggiornato da: Mikhail Dziadzko, MD, PhD

Chronic Pain in COVID-19 Patients Discharged From Intensive Care Unit - a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

More than six million French were affected by SARS-COV2 epidemic. About 20% of infected peoples were hospitalized, and about 5% were admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) for severe SARS-COV2 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management.

A spectrum of neuropsychiatric sequelae, specific for the ICU exposure, was already described, including post-intensive care syndrome and persistent pain.

A growing body of evidence suggests the impact of SARS-COV2 exposure on the occurrence of neurological disorders and chronic pain syndrome development in COVID-19 patients.

Taking together, one can expect a large number of patients discharged from ICU after severe COVID-19 with high prevalence of persistent pain and psychological disorders. To date, no study has evaluated neither the incidence of persistant pains in ICU COVID-19 survivors, nor pain phenotypes.

The knowledge of such data is crucial in order to anticipate the management of such patients by specialized pain team, and to quantify the possible incurred burden of care.

Our study aims to evaluate the incidence of pain, pain localization and severity, associated pain-related psychological disorders, and to perform quantitative sensory testing in severe COVID-19 patients, admitted to the ICU for more than 48 hours and successfully discharged home during the first French pandemic wave.

Panoramica dello studio

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

143

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Francia, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
        • Hôpital Bicêtre AP-HP
      • Lyon, Francia, 69004
        • Hôpital de la croix Rousse - Hospices Civils de Lyon
    • Hauts-de-Seine
      • Garches, Hauts-de-Seine, Francia, 92380
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré - AP-HP

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

adult patients, infected with SARS COV2 and developed severe COVID, requiring hospitalisation to the ICU during the first French wave of COVID 19, with length of stay > 48 hours, survived and successfully discharged, and approached from 6th month post discharge.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults (>=18 y.o.)
  • hospitalized in the ICU for at least 48 hours
  • with SARS-Cov2 infection confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)/serology and/or a suggestive chest Computed Tomography scan
  • during the first wave of COVID 19 from March to December 2020 at three investigator sites (2 in Paris and 1 in Lyon)
  • discharged alive from the ICU
  • at least 6 months after discharge

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
  • inability to communicate or to have in-person appointment
  • death in the period from ICU discharge to the first phone call for interview

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Modelli osservazionali: Coorte
  • Prospettive temporali: Trasversale

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
post COVID-19 ICU survivors
Patients hospitalized to the ICU in the context of severe COVID-19 and discharged alive during the first French COVID-19 pandemic wave
Patient-reported outcomes, listed in the Secondary Outcome Measure Section
Summation pain threshold test and Heat pain threshold skin test

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Incidence of secondary chronic pain
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge

Secondary chronic pain as defined by International Classification of Disease -11th revision (ICD-11).

Chronic secondary pain is organized into the following six categories:

  1. Chronic cancer-related pain (ICD-11 code MG30.1)
  2. Chronic postsurgical or post-traumatic pain (ICD-11 code MG30.2)
  3. Chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain (ICD-11 code MG30.3)
  4. Chronic secondary visceral pain (ICD-11 code MG30.4)
  5. Chronic neuropathic pain (ICD-11 code MG30.5)
  6. Chronic secondary headache or orofacial pain (ICD-11 code MG30.6)

Any pain detected in the population of interest and fitting in one of 6 categories will be accounted.

starting 6 month after discharge

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Frequency of different secondary chronic pain classes
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge

as defined by ICD-11 and the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)

Chronic secondary pain is organized into the following six categories:

  1. Chronic cancer-related pain (ICD-11 code MG30.1)
  2. Chronic postsurgical or post-traumatic pain (ICD-11 code MG30.2)
  3. Chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain (ICD-11 code MG30.3)
  4. Chronic secondary visceral pain (ICD-11 code MG30.4)
  5. Chronic neuropathic pain (ICD-11 code MG30.5)
  6. Chronic secondary headache or orofacial pain (ICD-11 code MG30.6)

For each category of detected pain the frequency will be reported.

starting 6 month after discharge
Pain sensitivity level
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
Pain sensitivity level is tested with a Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ). PSQ contains 17 items assessing pain with 11 level scoring from 0 (not at all painful) to 10 (most severe pain imaginable). Maximal summation score is 170, higher score mean worse outcome.
starting 6 month after discharge
Pain localization
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
A Michigan Body Map will be used for pain localization inventory. A Michigan Body Map is a self-report measure to assess body areas where chronic pain is experienced.
starting 6 month after discharge
The severity of pain and its impact on functioning
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
A Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess the severity of pain and its impact on functioning. The BPI pain scales defines pain as follows: Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain. Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain. Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain. BPI Interference Items use 0 (less) to 10 (worth) scoring, the arithmetic mean of the interference items is used as a measure of pain interference, higher score mean worse outcome.
starting 6 month after discharge
Neuropathic pain
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
A DN4 scale will be used to detect a neuropathic pain. The DN4 (which stands for Douleur Neuropathique 4) is a clinician-administered questionnaire consisting of 10 items. Seven items related to pain quality (i.e. sensory and pain descriptors) are based on an interview with the patient and 3 items based on the clinical examination. Each item has binary value (yes/no), maximal summation score is 10, and the threshold for neuropathic pain is 4.
starting 6 month after discharge
Spiegel Sleep Quality Questionnaire
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
Spiegel Sleep Questionnaire is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses the current sleep quality and disturbances. It has six 5 point Likert-like items rated from worst to best value. The total summation score is 30, less score values indicates worth outcome. The threshold of bad sleep is less than 15, and the score 20 indicates a good sleep.
starting 6 month after discharge
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses the symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Respondents rate each item from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") to indicate the degree to which they have been bothered by that particular symptom over the past month.

A total symptom severity score is obtained by summing the scores for each of the 20 items. The score superior of 31 is indicative of probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

starting 6 month after discharge
Anxiety and Depression
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge

Hospital Anxiety Depression scale will be used, it measures anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression. Greater score values indicates worth outcome.

For both scales, scores of less than 7 indicate non-cases; 8-10 - mild depression or anxiety; 11-14 - moderate depression or anxiety; and 15-21 - severe depression or anxiety.

starting 6 month after discharge
Pain Catastrophizing Level
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
Pain Catastrophizing Scale quantifies an individual's pain experience. It has 13 items rated on 5-point Likert-like scales (0 - not at all to 4 - all the time). A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52), the threshold above 30 is considered clinically relevant. Higher score indicates higher level of catastrophizing and bad outcome.
starting 6 month after discharge
Perceived Stress Level
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a self stress assessment instrument. It has 10 items rated on 5-point Likert-like scales (0 - never to 4 - very often). Individual scores on the PSS-10 can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
starting 6 month after discharge
Summation pain threshold
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
Mechanical temporal summation will be evoked using methodology described by Weissman-Fogel, 2008, by Von Frey Filaments, using a 180-gr filament that will be applied to the volar aspect of the dominant forearm. Patients will be exposed to a single stimulus and will be asked to rate the level of pinprick pain intensity using 11 items numeric pain scale. This pain score serve as an index for mechanical suprathreshold pain. Subsequently, 1 Hz repetitive stimuli will be applied within an area of 1 cm in diameter, using the same filament, and subjects will be asked to rate the pain intensity of the last stimulus. The magnitude of mechanical temporal summation will be calculated as the difference between the last and the first pain scores. Higher values indicates worth outcome.
starting 6 month after discharge
Heat pain threshold
Lasso di tempo: starting 6 month after discharge
A heat pain threshold will be realized using Thermal Stimulator for Sensory testing (SOMEDIC(R)). A thermode (heating stick) of 7 square centimeters will be applied to the volar aspect of the dominant forearm. Patients will be exposed to 3 repetitive gradual increase in temperature from 32° to 52°C. The skin contact will be withdrawn if an individual is not able to tolerate such stimulation, and the temperature threshold of tolerance will be noted. The final reading will be the median of three measurements, higher values indicate better tolerance.
starting 6 month after discharge

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

11 gennaio 2021

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2022

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 febbraio 2022

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 giugno 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

23 giugno 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

25 giugno 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

2 febbraio 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

1 febbraio 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 febbraio 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

No

Descrizione del piano IPD

individual participant data are the property of investigator's centers and will not be shared

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Dolore neuropatico

Prove cliniche su Pain and neuropsychological questionnaires

Sottoscrivi