이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Comparative Efficacy of Various Non-invasive Methods in Assessing Response to Beta-blockers as Secondary Prophylaxis for Acute Variceal Bleed.

2021년 12월 28일 업데이트: Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
Portal hypertension (PH) is a common complication of chronic liver disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients. One of the most serious complications of liver cirrhosis is esophageal varices (EV) bleeding. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for detecting portal hypertension and its complications. Furthermore, HVPG is the most reliable method for assessing the efficacy of treatment with nonselective -blockers (NSBB), which is the preferred therapy in patients with EV who are at high risk of bleeding (HRV) and as a secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of rebleed. However, the HVPG is an invasive method that is not widely used and necessitates specialized skills. For these reasons, clinical research over the last decade has been focused on identifying non-invasive tests (NITs) capable of evaluating the PH degree and its changes. The most investigated non-invasive tests are liver and splenic stiffness measurement. In advanced cirrhosis, the increase in portal pressure is less dependent on intrahepatic resistance to portal flow due to fibrosis progression and more dependent on extra-hepatic factors such as hyperdynamic circulation and splanchnic vasodilation hence correlation between LSM and PH decreases for HVPG values higher than 12 mmHg.

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

상세 설명

Aim:

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests in predicting response to NSBB for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleed at 6wks.

Primary objective:

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive modalities in correctly predicting response to beta-blockers as compared with HVPG in preventing variceal rebleed at 6 weeks.

Secondary objectives:

  • Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.
  • Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders.
  • AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.
  • Correlation between HVPG &non invasive test, responder and non-responder.
  • Comparison ofhypersplenism(Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.
  • Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.
  • Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.

Methodology:

  • Study population:All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion
  • Study design: Prospective observational study. The study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology ILBS.
  • Study period: 1.5 years
  • Sample size: Assuming that Sn of 92%, α of 5%, Power 80, we need to have 186 patients. So we decided to enroll ~200 cases (Including 5% defaulter rate)

Intervention:

  • HVPG done at the baseline within 5days of acute variceal bleed and at 6weeks
  • Endoscopic variceal band ligation at 3rd week
  • NSBB started on day 6 which optimised according to heart rate and continued for 6 weeks.
  • Monitoring and assessment
  • Patients with acute variceal bleed after endovariceal band ligation will be undergoing HVPG, TE to measure splenic stiffness and baseline investigations such as complete blood count, liver and kidney function test, ultrasonography of the abdomen, contrast enhanced computerized tomography of abdomen. These investigations will be carried out within 5days. After 5 days NSBB is started and is optimsed to maximum dose according to heart rate and blood pressure. After 3 weeks EVL is done. After 6 weeks of NSBB, after 3weeks of secondary EVL;HVPG, TE to measure liver and splenic stiffness and other baseline investigations are done.

    • Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG):

  • Prior to the HVPG measurement, a venous access was performed under ultrasonography after local anesthesia. The Seldinger technique was used to insert a catheter into the right brachial vein or the right internal jugular vein. An occlusion balloon catheter of 6 F was guided in a branch of the hepatic veins, usually the median or right vein, under fluoroscopic control and continuous electrocardiographic and pressure monitoring.
  • After inflating the balloon at the catheter's tip (maximum diameter ranges from 8.5-11.5 mm), a venous check was performed to demonstrate complete vessel occlusion. The wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) was measured in this condition. Following that, the free hepatic vein pressure (FHVP) was measured after deflating the balloon at the catheter's tip. On a multi-channel recorder, a permanent trace was obtained. Pressures were also achieved in the inferior vena cava and the right atrium. According to the Baveno VI consensus, the HVPG-response was defined as a 20% or 12 mmHg reduction in HVPG after NSBB treatment.
  • HVPG= WHVP - FHVP (Normal is <5mm of Hg)

    • Ultrasonography of the abdomen:

  • dilated portal vein (>13 mm): non-specific
  • biphasic or reverse flow in portal vein (late stage): pathognomonic
  • recanalization of paraumbilical vein: pathognomonic
  • portal-systemic collateral pathways (collateral vessels/varices)
  • splenomegaly
  • ascites
  • The damping index (showing changes in the doppler hepatic vein waveform) corresponds with hemodynamically significant portal hypertension and HVPG values (together with HVPG changes after treatment)
  • splenic arterial resistive index

    • Liver and splenic stiffness:

  • A 3.5-MHz ultrasound transducer probe is mounted on the axis of a vibrator in the FibroScan device. Mild amplitude, low-frequency (50 Hz) vibrations are transmitted to the liver tissue, causing an elastic shear wave to propagate through the underlying tissue.If the success rate was greater than 60% and the interquartile range (IQR) was greater than 30% of the median value, LS values were accepted.
  • Guidelines for measuring SS is same as LS. SS was performed on a supine patient with maximal abduction of the left arm, with the probe positioned in an intercostal space where the spleen was correctly visualized by US. Furthermore, in accordance with the FibroScan's technical features, patients with a splenic parenchymal thickness of >4 cm under the probe were excluded.

    • Radiomics:

  • Convolutional neural network - Deep learning using liver and splenic channels for assessment of portal hypertension.
  • STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
  • Continuous variables are expressed as the median and categorical data as numbers (percentages) (range). For group comparison, use the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the 2 test for categorical variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to assess the linear relationship between noninvasive tests and HVPG (r). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be computed for each of the diagnostic parameters evaluated (age, transaminases, platelet count, spleen diameter, Plt/Spl, LS, SS, LSPS), as well as the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).For all tests, p≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analysis will be performed using SPSS .The analysis will be done with intention to treat and per protocol analysis if applicable.
  • Adverse effects:
  • 1. Major Sideeffects of Betablockers
  • Bradycardia,Heart block
  • Hyperglycaemia
  • Heart failure
  • Increase in airway resistance
  • Worsening lipid profile
  • Exacerbration of peripheral vascular disease

    2. HVPG related complications

  • Transient arrhythmias
  • Vagal reaction
  • Local access pain and bleeding
  • Stopping rule: Development of serious adverse effects leading to withdrawal of the drug or death from any cause.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (예상)

200

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, 인도, 110070
        • Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
        • 연락하다:

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical / radiological /histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis (Child A&B)
  • Age >18 years
  • Advanced compensated liver disease of different etiology(Viral,metabolic,alcoholic)
  • Upper GI bleed
  • Valid consent
  • No history of NSBB use in last 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 70 years
  • Portal vein thrombosis
  • Underlaying shunts
  • Spleen anteroposterior diameter <4cm
  • Non cirrhotic portal hypertension
  • Only PHG, Ectopic varices
  • Heart rate <50bpm, SBP<100mm of Hg,Asthma, COPD, Aortic disease, atrioventricular block, Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Pregnancy
  • obese(BMI>30mm of Hg)
  • HIV
  • HCC / Other malignancy
  • Other Comorbidities: Chronic kidney disease [ CrCl< 30] Cirrhosis : Child C Stroke Cardiac failure, Uncontrolled diabetes(HbA1c >9)
  • AST/ALT >5 times
  • Drug allergies
  • ACLF
  • Narrow intercoastal space
  • Failure to give informed consent from family members.
  • Patient enrolled in other clinical study

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 관찰 모델: 케이스 전용
  • 시간 관점: 유망한

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
Liver Cirrhosis
All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis admitted to Intensive care unit of Hepatology department of ILBS.
이것은 관찰 연구입니다

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
기간
Change in HVPG and its correlation with non-invasive methods.
기간: 6 Weeks
6 Weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Assessment of severity of portal hypertension by non-invasive methods.
기간: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Correlation and Cut-off values for non-invasive methods in responders and non-responders in relation to HVPG.
기간: 6 weeks
Non invasive methods - LSM,SSM & LSPS
6 weeks
Correlation of Serological and radiological non invasive tests response in comparison with HVPG.
기간: 6 weeks
AAR, APRI, FIB-4 index, CSPH risk score,fibrosis index, GPR, King's score, Lok score are other non- invasive tests.
6 weeks
Comparison of hypersplenism (Splenic volume and area) and hematological parameters before and after treatment.
기간: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Diagnosis and response assessment by convolutional neural network- AI based model.
기간: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Prognostic implication of HVPG rebleed on EVL+beta-blockers.
기간: 6 weeks
6 weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (예상)

2022년 1월 10일

기본 완료 (예상)

2022년 10월 10일

연구 완료 (예상)

2022년 10월 10일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2021년 10월 8일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2021년 12월 8일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 12월 21일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2022년 1월 14일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 12월 28일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 10월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • ILBS-Bleed-01

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

급성 정맥류 출혈에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다