이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

IBS-Oriented CDED Versus Low FODMAP Diet for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-CDED)

2026년 7월 12일 업데이트: Ariel University

Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) Versus Low FODMAP Diet for Managing Non-Constipation Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Background: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) affects approximately 4.1% of the global population and imposes a significant personal and healthcare burden. Recent evidence highlights the role of low-grade inflammation, impaired intestinal permeability and gut microbiota dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of non-constipated IBS (IBS with predominate diarrhea; IBS-D and mixed type IBS; IBS-M). Most patients report food-related symptom exacerbation, making dietary intervention a cornerstone of treatment. While the low-FODMAP diet (LFD) is widely used to reduce fermentable carbohydrates and alleviate symptoms, it may negatively affect microbial diversity and lacks anti-inflammatory effects. In contrast, the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED), developed for Crohn's disease, has demonstrated the ability to reduce intestinal inflammation, improve barrier function, and promote a favorable microbiota profile. These mechanisms may be relevant and beneficial in IBS, but have yet to be studied in this population.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of a modified CDED to the LFD for the treatment of non-constipated IBS symptoms, Hypothesis: A modified CDED will be at least as effective as the LFD in alleviating non-constipation IBS symptoms, stool consistency, quality of life, and psychological distress, while demonstrating superior effects on markers of low-grade inflammation, gut microbiota composition, and intestinal permeability.

Methods: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized study to be conducted at the Gastroenterology Department of Sheba Medical Center. 136 adults diagnosed with Rome IV-defined IBS-D or IBS-M and an IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) ≥175 will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a modified CDED or the LFD for 6 weeks. Accounting for a 10% dropout rate, the total sample size will be 150.

Following a 14-day screening period, eligible participants will undergo data collection at baseline, week 3 and week 6. Visit 1 (screening) will be conducted on-site; visits 2-4 will be remote. Participants will complete daily symptom diaries [Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and GI Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], and weekly IBS-SSS. Validated questionnaires assessing psychological distress, somatization, extraintestinal symptoms, and quality of life will be administered at each time point.

Stool samples will be collected at baseline, week 3, and week 6. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and α1-Antitrypsin (A1AT) will be analyzed as markers of intestinal inflammation and permeability. Microbiota analysis will be conducted using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, with evaluation of microbial diversity, taxonomic shifts, and associations with clinical and biological outcomes.

Significance: This is the first study to evaluate the modified CDED as a dietary intervention for the treatment of IBS. It may offer a novel, inflammation-targeted alternative treatment for IBS.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of structural disease. Increasing evidence suggests that, particularly in non-constipated IBS (IBS-D and IBS-M), impaired intestinal barrier function, gut microbiota dysbiosis, mucosal immune activation, and low-grade inflammation contribute to symptom generation. These findings have shifted the focus of research toward dietary strategies that target underlying biological mechanisms rather than symptom reduction alone.

The low FODMAP diet is currently the most extensively studied dietary intervention for IBS and is recommended by international guidelines. However, despite its effectiveness in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms, concerns remain regarding its potential adverse effects on gut microbial diversity and the lack of evidence for improvement in intestinal inflammation or barrier integrity.

The Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) was originally developed for patients with Crohn's disease and has demonstrated favorable effects on intestinal inflammation, epithelial barrier function, and gut microbiota composition. Because several of these biological pathways are also implicated in IBS pathophysiology, an adapted version of the CDED may provide clinical benefits while simultaneously targeting disease mechanisms that are not addressed by current dietary approaches.

This study will evaluate, for the first time, an IBS-oriented adaptation of the CDED that excludes the enteral formula component used in Crohn's disease. In addition to evaluating clinical efficacy, the study will investigate potential biological mechanisms through serial assessment of fecal inflammatory markers, intestinal permeability markers, and gut microbiota composition. By integrating clinical, psychological, and biological outcomes, the study aims to determine whether this dietary intervention represents a mechanism-based alternative to the current dietary standard of care for patients with non-constipated IBS.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

150

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults, men, and women (≥18 years) are diagnosed with IBS-D or IBS-M according to Rome IV criteria.
  • Moderate-to-severe symptoms (IBS-SSS score ≥175).
  • Stable use of any IBS-related medications for ≥6 weeks before study enrollment, except for antibiotics

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coexisting GI diseases [e.g., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, SIBO, celiac disease [positive transglutaminase (TTG) serology].
  • Disease that could explain or influence symptoms or GI function, including diabetes, thyroid disease [abnormal Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH)], and bariatric surgery.
  • Recent intestinal resection.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known food allergies.
  • Current active eating disorder
  • Participants already following a restrictive diet, including diets that overlap with the interventions in this study, will be excluded to prevent confounding effects on gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms, and to ensure consistent baseline conditions. However, individuals who have discontinued such diets at least two to four weeks prior to enrollment may be eligible, allowing for a sufficient dietary washout period to minimize residual effects on the gut microbiota.
  • Currently under obesity management medication treatment.
  • Vegans
  • Use of antibiotics within the 4 weeks prior to enrollment or during the study period.
  • Abnormal hemoglobin levels (for women<11.5 gr/dl, for men<13 gr/dl)29
  • Baseline CRP≥5

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED)
Participants randomized to this arm will follow a modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) adapted for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. The intervention excludes the enteral formula used in the original CDED protocol and is delivered for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.
Participants will follow a modified Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) adapted for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. The intervention excludes the enteral formula used in the original CDED protocol and is delivered for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.
활성 비교기: Low FODMAP Diet
Participants randomized to this arm will follow a standard low FODMAP diet for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.
Participants will follow a standard low FODMAP diet for 6 weeks with individualized dietary counseling.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Proportion of participants achieving a clinically meaningful response (≥50-point reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score [IBS-SSS])
기간: Baseline and Week 6
The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of participants achieving a clinically meaningful response, defined as a reduction of at least 50 points from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment. The IBS-SSS is a validated questionnaire ranging from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline and Week 6

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥100-point reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)
기간: Baseline and Week 6
Proportion of participants achieving a reduction of at least 100 points from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment.
Baseline and Week 6
Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)
기간: Baseline and Week 6
Proportion of participants achieving a reduction of at least 50% from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after 6 weeks of treatment.
Baseline and Week 6
Change from baseline in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS)
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Absolute and percentage change from baseline in the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS). Scores range from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in gastrointestinal symptom severity (Visual Analog Scale)
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Absolute and percentage change from baseline in gastrointestinal symptom severity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in quality of life
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in IBS-specific quality of life measured using the IBS-Quality of Life questionnaire (IBS-QOL). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in psychological distress
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in psychological distress assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a validated 14-item questionnaire consisting of two 7-item subscales assessing anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D). Each subscale ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Total HADS score ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater overall psychological distress.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in extraintestinal symptoms
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in extraintestinal symptom burden assessed using a modified version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), including 12 non-gastrointestinal items after exclusion of the three gastrointestinal symptom items (abdominal pain, constipation/diarrhea, and nausea/gas/indigestion). Each item is scored from 0 to 2, with higher scores indicating greater extraintestinal symptom burden.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in intestinal permeability measured by fecal α1-antitrypsin (A1AT)
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in fecal α1-antitrypsin concentration, a biomarker of intestinal permeability.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in fecal calprotectin concentration
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in fecal calprotectin concentration as a marker of intestinal inflammation.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change in gut microbiota composition
기간: Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Change from baseline in gut microbiota composition and diversity assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Baseline, Week 3, and Week 6
Participants' experiences with the dietary intervention
기간: Follow up: after completion of the 6-week intervention
Participants' perceptions, barriers, facilitators, and overall experiences with the assigned dietary intervention assessed through structured qualitative interviews.
Follow up: after completion of the 6-week intervention

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

수사관

  • 연구 의자: Keren Hod, RD PhD, Ariel University

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

유용한 링크

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 7월 7일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2028년 7월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2028년 12월 31일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 12일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 16일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 12일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

3
구독하다