이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Implementation of Acute Heart Failure Checklist

2026년 7월 22일 업데이트: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

An Implementation Study to Improve Care of Patients With Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) commonly present to the emergency department (ED) with difficulty breathing and often have poor outcomes or death. Care of AHF is very complex and, unfortunately, there are no specific guidelines for how physicians should manage AHF in the ED. The investigators recently created the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) AHF Best Practices Checklist, a concise document that provides specific guidance for ED care.

Our ultimate goal is to conduct a 12-site cluster study to introduce the CAEP AHF Checklist in multiple EDs. Before the investigators can do so, it is essential to demonstrate feasibility in a smaller-scale study. Our objective for this application is to conduct an internal pilot study to demonstrate feasibility of measuring implementation outcomes and refine the protocol if necessary. The investigators will develop strategies to encourage successful adoption of the Checklist by physicians in the ED and allocate 4 large Ontario EDs to implement the Checklist for 1,700 adult AHF patients.

This study will be very important for patients and the healthcare system. If the investigators show that the CAEP AHF Checklist improves patient management and outcomes, this would lead to widespread uptake of the Checklist by all EDs in Canada.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Background: Heart failure is a syndrome that results from impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood. Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) commonly present to the emergency department (ED) with increased shortness of breath and often have poor outcomes or death. Management of AHF is very complex and entails assessment, multiple treatment options, and the difficult decision of whether to hospitalize or discharge. Unfortunately, there are no specific guidelines for how to manage AHF in the ED. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) has very detailed high-quality guidelines for heart failure, but these are not specific for AHF or the ED setting.

The investigators recently created the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) AHF Best Practices Checklist by adapting the CCS guidelines with a panel of 32 emergency physicians, cardiologists, intern-ists, methodologists, and patients. This concise document provides specific guidance for ED physicians and was recently published (Can J Emerg Med Sept 2025).

Study Objective: Our overall goal is to improve care of AHF patients in Canadian EDs and our specific objective is to conduct an implementation study of the CAEP AHF Checklist to decrease mortality and morbidity.

Methods: Design: Cross-sectional 4-sequence 5 period stepped-wedge cluster study in which the "clinical intervention" is the CAEP AHF Checklist, and the "implementation intervention" is the introduction of the Checklist into ED physician practice. Over 30 months, 3 hospitals will cross over every 6 months from the control to the intervention period. There will be a 2-month transition period. Setting: 12 large EDs in 5 provinces. Subjects: All physicians managing AHF in the ED are the primary study participants (emergency, medicine, cardiology, and hospitalists). The patients to be included are consecutive adults age >18 who present with shortness of breath due to AHF. Interventions: The clinical intervention is the CAEP AHF Checklist and the implementation intervention are the behaviour change strategies to encourage the adoption of and adherence to the Checklist into the practice of the physicians managing AHF patients (during the intervention periods of the trial). Outcomes: The primary outcome will be a composite of 3 clinical effectiveness variables: 1) Mortality <30 days, 2) Deterioration post index visit admission, requiring endotracheal intubation or non-invasive ventilation, or 3) Relapse back to ED requiring hospital admission <14 days. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include any of the individual com-ponents of the composite primary outcome. Secondary implementation outcomes include adherence to the Checklist by review of quality indicators and surveys to measure penetration and acceptability. Data Analysis: The primary outcome will be analyzed according to the intention to treat principle, adhering to the randomized schedule of implementation. The unit of analysis will be the individual patient using mixed effects logistic regression accounting for the stepped wedge design. A priori subgroups will be sex male/female, age >75/<75 years, and admitted/discharged. Sample Size: The investigators estimate a total enrollment of 5,040 cases.

Importance: If the investigators demonstrate that local implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist improves patient management and outcomes, this justifies widespread scaling of the initiative to all EDs in Canada and elsewhere worldwide.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

5040

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Ian Stiell, MD, MSc
  • 전화번호: 18683 +16137985555
  • 이메일: istiell@ohri.ca

연구 장소

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, 캐나다, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
        • 연락하다:
          • Ian Stiell, MD, MSc
          • 전화번호: 18683 6137985555
          • 이메일: istiell@ohri.ca

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All resident and staff physicians managing patients with AHF in the ED are the primary study participants and this includes emergency, medicine, cardiology, and hospitalists.
  • The patients that will be included are consecutive adults age >18 years and who present to the ED with recent onset of or recent increase in shortness of breath due to AHF, as determined by health records review.
  • Eligibility of patients will be reviewed by the blinded study Steering Committee.
  • Included will be both patients subsequently admitted to hospital and those discharged from the ED, as both will be impacted by the recommendations of the CAEP AHF Checklist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who do not fit the definition of AHF;
  • if the primary reason for the ED visit was not AHF (e.g. pneumonia, pulmonary embolism);
  • who have acute myocardial infarction (either ST elevation or non-ST elevation) diagnosed in the ED, because the primary problem for these patients is not heart failure and they require specialized treatment beyond the scope of the Checklist; or
  • who are considered terminal, with death expected within 60 days.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: CAEP AHF Checklist Implementation
Implementation of the CAEP Acute Heart Failure (AHF) Best Practices Checklist in emergency departments. This includes both the clinical intervention (use of the Checklist to guide assessment, treatment, and disposition of AHF patients) and implementation strategies to promote uptake, such as physician education sessions, local champions, reminders, audit and feedback, and access to a smartphone application
Implementation of the CAEP Acute Heart Failure (AHF) Best Practices Checklist to guide physician assessment, treatment, and disposition of patients presenting with AHF in the emergency department. The intervention includes structured implementation strategies to support behavior change and uptake, including identification of local physician champions, education sessions and presentations, review of barriers and facilitators, development of local action plans, reminders, audit and feedback on adherence, and access to a smartphone application providing the Checklist as a point-of-care reference.
다른: Usual Care
Usual emergency department care for patients with acute heart failure prior to implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist, with no exposure to active implementation strategies.
Standard emergency department care for patients with acute heart failure prior to implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist, with no exposure to active implementation strategies.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
모든 원인으로 인한 사망
기간: 30일 이내
30일 이내
Number of Participants With Deterioration During the Index Visit
기간: within 24 hours
deterioration during index visit, defined as requiring endotracheal intubation or mechanical non-invasive ventilation
within 24 hours
Number of Participants With Relapse to the Emergency Department for a Related Medical Condition Requiring Hospital Admission Within 14 Days
기간: Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit
Relapse back to the emergency department for a related medical condition requiring hospital admission within 14 days of the index emergency department visit.
Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Length of Stay in the Emergency Department
기간: Up to 14 days following the index emergency department visit
Emergency department length of stay for the index visit.
Up to 14 days following the index emergency department visit
Number of Participants Admitted to Hospital Immediately or Within 30 Days
기간: Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Hospital admission occurring during the index emergency department visit or within 30 days of the index visit.
Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Length of Stay in Hospital
기간: Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Hospital length of stay for participants admitted during the index visit or within 30 days of the index emergency department visit.
Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Number of Participants With a Repeat Emergency Department Visit
기간: Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit
Repeat emergency department visit for any reason following the index emergency department visit.
Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Ian Stiell, MD, MSc, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 8월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2029년 12월 31일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2030년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 3일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 22일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 27일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 27일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 22일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

IPD 계획 설명

Requests to be submitted to the Principal Investigator and the study team will review on a case-by-case basis.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다