Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Implementation of Acute Heart Failure Checklist

22 juli 2026 bijgewerkt door: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

An Implementation Study to Improve Care of Patients With Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) commonly present to the emergency department (ED) with difficulty breathing and often have poor outcomes or death. Care of AHF is very complex and, unfortunately, there are no specific guidelines for how physicians should manage AHF in the ED. The investigators recently created the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) AHF Best Practices Checklist, a concise document that provides specific guidance for ED care.

Our ultimate goal is to conduct a 12-site cluster study to introduce the CAEP AHF Checklist in multiple EDs. Before the investigators can do so, it is essential to demonstrate feasibility in a smaller-scale study. Our objective for this application is to conduct an internal pilot study to demonstrate feasibility of measuring implementation outcomes and refine the protocol if necessary. The investigators will develop strategies to encourage successful adoption of the Checklist by physicians in the ED and allocate 4 large Ontario EDs to implement the Checklist for 1,700 adult AHF patients.

This study will be very important for patients and the healthcare system. If the investigators show that the CAEP AHF Checklist improves patient management and outcomes, this would lead to widespread uptake of the Checklist by all EDs in Canada.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Background: Heart failure is a syndrome that results from impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood. Patients with acute heart failure (AHF) commonly present to the emergency department (ED) with increased shortness of breath and often have poor outcomes or death. Management of AHF is very complex and entails assessment, multiple treatment options, and the difficult decision of whether to hospitalize or discharge. Unfortunately, there are no specific guidelines for how to manage AHF in the ED. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) has very detailed high-quality guidelines for heart failure, but these are not specific for AHF or the ED setting.

The investigators recently created the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) AHF Best Practices Checklist by adapting the CCS guidelines with a panel of 32 emergency physicians, cardiologists, intern-ists, methodologists, and patients. This concise document provides specific guidance for ED physicians and was recently published (Can J Emerg Med Sept 2025).

Study Objective: Our overall goal is to improve care of AHF patients in Canadian EDs and our specific objective is to conduct an implementation study of the CAEP AHF Checklist to decrease mortality and morbidity.

Methods: Design: Cross-sectional 4-sequence 5 period stepped-wedge cluster study in which the "clinical intervention" is the CAEP AHF Checklist, and the "implementation intervention" is the introduction of the Checklist into ED physician practice. Over 30 months, 3 hospitals will cross over every 6 months from the control to the intervention period. There will be a 2-month transition period. Setting: 12 large EDs in 5 provinces. Subjects: All physicians managing AHF in the ED are the primary study participants (emergency, medicine, cardiology, and hospitalists). The patients to be included are consecutive adults age >18 who present with shortness of breath due to AHF. Interventions: The clinical intervention is the CAEP AHF Checklist and the implementation intervention are the behaviour change strategies to encourage the adoption of and adherence to the Checklist into the practice of the physicians managing AHF patients (during the intervention periods of the trial). Outcomes: The primary outcome will be a composite of 3 clinical effectiveness variables: 1) Mortality <30 days, 2) Deterioration post index visit admission, requiring endotracheal intubation or non-invasive ventilation, or 3) Relapse back to ED requiring hospital admission <14 days. Secondary effectiveness outcomes include any of the individual com-ponents of the composite primary outcome. Secondary implementation outcomes include adherence to the Checklist by review of quality indicators and surveys to measure penetration and acceptability. Data Analysis: The primary outcome will be analyzed according to the intention to treat principle, adhering to the randomized schedule of implementation. The unit of analysis will be the individual patient using mixed effects logistic regression accounting for the stepped wedge design. A priori subgroups will be sex male/female, age >75/<75 years, and admitted/discharged. Sample Size: The investigators estimate a total enrollment of 5,040 cases.

Importance: If the investigators demonstrate that local implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist improves patient management and outcomes, this justifies widespread scaling of the initiative to all EDs in Canada and elsewhere worldwide.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Geschat)

5040

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

  • Naam: Ian Stiell, MD, MSc
  • Telefoonnummer: 18683 +16137985555
  • E-mail: istiell@ohri.ca

Studie Locaties

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
        • Contact:
          • Ian Stiell, MD, MSc
          • Telefoonnummer: 18683 6137985555
          • E-mail: istiell@ohri.ca

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All resident and staff physicians managing patients with AHF in the ED are the primary study participants and this includes emergency, medicine, cardiology, and hospitalists.
  • The patients that will be included are consecutive adults age >18 years and who present to the ED with recent onset of or recent increase in shortness of breath due to AHF, as determined by health records review.
  • Eligibility of patients will be reviewed by the blinded study Steering Committee.
  • Included will be both patients subsequently admitted to hospital and those discharged from the ED, as both will be impacted by the recommendations of the CAEP AHF Checklist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who do not fit the definition of AHF;
  • if the primary reason for the ED visit was not AHF (e.g. pneumonia, pulmonary embolism);
  • who have acute myocardial infarction (either ST elevation or non-ST elevation) diagnosed in the ED, because the primary problem for these patients is not heart failure and they require specialized treatment beyond the scope of the Checklist; or
  • who are considered terminal, with death expected within 60 days.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Crossover-opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: CAEP AHF Checklist Implementation
Implementation of the CAEP Acute Heart Failure (AHF) Best Practices Checklist in emergency departments. This includes both the clinical intervention (use of the Checklist to guide assessment, treatment, and disposition of AHF patients) and implementation strategies to promote uptake, such as physician education sessions, local champions, reminders, audit and feedback, and access to a smartphone application
Implementation of the CAEP Acute Heart Failure (AHF) Best Practices Checklist to guide physician assessment, treatment, and disposition of patients presenting with AHF in the emergency department. The intervention includes structured implementation strategies to support behavior change and uptake, including identification of local physician champions, education sessions and presentations, review of barriers and facilitators, development of local action plans, reminders, audit and feedback on adherence, and access to a smartphone application providing the Checklist as a point-of-care reference.
Ander: Usual Care
Usual emergency department care for patients with acute heart failure prior to implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist, with no exposure to active implementation strategies.
Standard emergency department care for patients with acute heart failure prior to implementation of the CAEP AHF Checklist, with no exposure to active implementation strategies.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Sterfte door alle oorzaken
Tijdsspanne: in 30 dagen
in 30 dagen
Number of Participants With Deterioration During the Index Visit
Tijdsspanne: within 24 hours
deterioration during index visit, defined as requiring endotracheal intubation or mechanical non-invasive ventilation
within 24 hours
Number of Participants With Relapse to the Emergency Department for a Related Medical Condition Requiring Hospital Admission Within 14 Days
Tijdsspanne: Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit
Relapse back to the emergency department for a related medical condition requiring hospital admission within 14 days of the index emergency department visit.
Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Length of Stay in the Emergency Department
Tijdsspanne: Up to 14 days following the index emergency department visit
Emergency department length of stay for the index visit.
Up to 14 days following the index emergency department visit
Number of Participants Admitted to Hospital Immediately or Within 30 Days
Tijdsspanne: Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Hospital admission occurring during the index emergency department visit or within 30 days of the index visit.
Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Length of Stay in Hospital
Tijdsspanne: Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Hospital length of stay for participants admitted during the index visit or within 30 days of the index emergency department visit.
Within 30 days of the index emergency department visit
Number of Participants With a Repeat Emergency Department Visit
Tijdsspanne: Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit
Repeat emergency department visit for any reason following the index emergency department visit.
Within 14 days of the index emergency department visit

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Ian Stiell, MD, MSc, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

1 augustus 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

31 december 2029

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

1 juni 2030

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

3 juli 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

22 juli 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

27 juli 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

27 juli 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

22 juli 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Beschrijving IPD-plan

Requests to be submitted to the Principal Investigator and the study team will review on a case-by-case basis.

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren