이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Developing and Testing a Brief, Personalized Intervention for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors (AFSP_PRECISE)

2026년 9월 9일 업데이트: Kevin Kuehn, University of California, San Diego
Suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States and around the world. Individuals at high-risk for suicide are heterogenous. Despite this heterogeneity, interventions are often developed and tested assuming that suicidal thoughts and behaviors are caused by common factors. The proposed research uses person-specific idiographic quantitative techniques to inform intervention development. In the first aim (N = 5), the investigators will refine a brief, personalized, and adjunctive intervention to help reduce emotional distress, increase effective emotion regulation strategies, and decrease suicidal thoughts. Participants will be recruited from the university counseling center. Participants will then complete six weeks of surveys delivered to their smartphones (5x/day), answering questions about their emotional states, emotion regulation, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. After the first 14 days, individual participant data will then be analyzed using idiographic techniques (n=1) to identify person-specific correlates of suicidal thoughts. Participants will meet with a coach to complete a risk assessment, review idiographic data, learn personally tailored skills from dialectical behavior therapy, and finish a personalized safety plan. Participants will be offered up to six sessions. Between sessions, participants will continue to complete surveys to measure progress and update idiographic models. The investigators will obtain feedback from these initial participants and refine the intervention. The investigators will then pilot test the intervention in an open-label non-randomized trial (N = 30), again recruiting students from the university counseling center. The investigators anticipate the intervention will be feasible and acceptable, and that participants' emotional distress will decrease, effective emotion regulation strategies increase, and suicidal thoughts decrease by the end of the six-week intervention. The investigators hope to test this intervention in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial. The proposed research marks an initial attempt at developing personalized interventions based on person-specific correlates of suicidal thoughts.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

Suicide is a public health emergency: an estimated 45,979 people in the United States died by suicide in 2020, and approximately 20% of U.S. youth report having seriously contemplated suicide in the past year. Most interventions for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are developed and tested using group-level (nomothetic) approaches, which assume that all individuals experience suicidal ideation for similar reasons and respond similarly to treatment. However, individuals at high risk for suicide are highly heterogeneous, and prior idiographic (person-specific) research has shown substantial between-person variability in the daily associations between suicidal thoughts and coping strategies. This suggests that personalized interventions, tailored to an individual's unique pattern of risk and coping, may be more effective than one-size-fits-all approaches.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for self-injurious behavior, but standard DBT is resource-intensive, creating barriers to access. Brief, adjunctive interventions show promise for reducing mental health symptoms and increasing engagement with more intensive services, but existing brief options (e.g., crisis lines) are underused. There is a need for a brief intervention that retains DBT's active ingredients while being personalized and more accessible than standard care.

This study will develop and pilot test PRECISE, a brief, personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. PRECISE integrates components of DBT with idiographic statistical modeling of each participant's own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify individualized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which then guide functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted skills coaching across up to six sessions.

Aim 1 (Months 1-12): Refine the PRECISE intervention manual through expert advisory review and initial testing with 5 participants to evaluate feasibility and acceptability.

Aim 2 (Months 13-24): Conduct an open-label, non-randomized pilot trial in 30 participants to evaluate recruitment/retention feasibility, further refine the intervention, and preliminarily examine outcomes.

Eligible participants (ages 18-26, active suicidal ideation, English fluency) complete baseline assessments, then begin smartphone-based EMA surveys for the six-week intervention duration. Each session opens with a suicide risk assessment; at-risk participants complete a structured risk management protocol. Primary outcomes are change in negative emotion intensity and adaptive emotion regulation strategy use, analyzed via mixed-effects models. Secondary outcomes include suicidal ideation, coping self-efficacy, and implementation outcomes (adherence, dropout, satisfaction).

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

35

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, 미국, 92093
        • Stein Clinical Research Building

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-26 years
  • Endorsement of active suicidal ideation on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (score >2, or past-month thoughts of killing self)
  • English fluency
  • Willingness to provide contact information for a key support person to be contacted as part of the study's risk and safety plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to read English
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic or severe thought disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder with psychotic features)

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: PRECISE
All enrolled participants receive the PRECISE intervention, a brief (up to six sessions over six weeks), personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. Sessions incorporate idiographic analysis of participants' own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify personalized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which inform functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted emotion regulation skills coaching. Each session begins with a suicide risk assessment; participants at acute risk complete a structured risk management protocol. Participants also complete smartphone-based EMA surveys multiple times daily throughout the six-week intervention period.
All enrolled participants receive the PRECISE intervention, a brief (up to six sessions over six weeks), personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. Sessions incorporate idiographic analysis of participants' own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify personalized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which inform functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted emotion regulation skills coaching. Each session begins with a suicide risk assessment; participants at acute risk complete a structured risk management protocol. Participants also complete smartphone-based EMA surveys multiple times daily throughout the six-week intervention period.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
기간: Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal ideation and behavior assessed via the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a structured interview administered by a trained assessor. The C-SSRS rates suicidal ideation along a severity continuum (from passive wish to be dead through active ideation with specific plan and intent) and separately captures suicidal behavior (actual, interrupted, and aborted attempts; preparatory acts; and non-suicidal self-injury). Ideation intensity (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, reasons for ideation) is also assessed.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal Ideation
기간: Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal ideation severity assessed via the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation (MSSI), a clinician-administered rating scale adapted from Beck's original Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). The MSSI extends the original SSI with additional items assessing components such as desire to live, desire to die, deterrents to suicide, and courage/competence to attempt, yielding a broader assessment of ideation severity and risk than the original scale.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Change in Negative Emotion Intensity
기간: Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in self-reported negative emotion intensity, assessed via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys completed up to five times daily throughout the intervention period. These items (fear, shame, sadness, anger, guilt), measured on a 0-100 scale, are adapted from Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with higher scores indicating greater degree of negative emotions. The Within-person trajectories of negative emotion will be analyzed using mixed-effects models to account for the nested structure of repeated EMA observations.
Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in Adaptive Emotion Regulation Strategy Use
기간: Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in use of adaptive (vs. maladaptive) emotion regulation strategies, calculated as a proportion score reflecting personalized strategies identified for each participant (e.g., problem-solving, cognitive reappraisal, acceptance) relative to strategies targeted for reduction (e.g., rumination, avoidance, suppression). These items are adapted from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), with higher scores indicating greater use of maladaptive strategies relative to adaptive ones. The proportion score ranges from 0 to 1. Strategy use is tracked weekly by the treatment coach and measured via EMA. Within-person trajectories will be analyzed using mixed-effects models.
Baseline through 6-weeks

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2024년 5월 23일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 9월 9일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 9월 9일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 31일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 31일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 8월 6일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 9월 9일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 806080
  • YIG-0-078-22 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: American Foundation for Suicide Prevention)

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

De-identified individual participant data, including baseline assessment measures and aggregated ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data, will be made publicly available via GitHub (https://github.com/kskuehn) following completion of the primary analyses and manuscript preparation. Data will be stripped of direct identifiers prior to posting. This data sharing plan is described in the study's informed consent document.

IPD 공유 기간

Mid-September 2026. Will be available indefinitely

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Open access

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다