此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Developing and Testing a Brief, Personalized Intervention for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors (AFSP_PRECISE)

2026年9月9日 更新者:Kevin Kuehn、University of California, San Diego
Suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States and around the world. Individuals at high-risk for suicide are heterogenous. Despite this heterogeneity, interventions are often developed and tested assuming that suicidal thoughts and behaviors are caused by common factors. The proposed research uses person-specific idiographic quantitative techniques to inform intervention development. In the first aim (N = 5), the investigators will refine a brief, personalized, and adjunctive intervention to help reduce emotional distress, increase effective emotion regulation strategies, and decrease suicidal thoughts. Participants will be recruited from the university counseling center. Participants will then complete six weeks of surveys delivered to their smartphones (5x/day), answering questions about their emotional states, emotion regulation, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. After the first 14 days, individual participant data will then be analyzed using idiographic techniques (n=1) to identify person-specific correlates of suicidal thoughts. Participants will meet with a coach to complete a risk assessment, review idiographic data, learn personally tailored skills from dialectical behavior therapy, and finish a personalized safety plan. Participants will be offered up to six sessions. Between sessions, participants will continue to complete surveys to measure progress and update idiographic models. The investigators will obtain feedback from these initial participants and refine the intervention. The investigators will then pilot test the intervention in an open-label non-randomized trial (N = 30), again recruiting students from the university counseling center. The investigators anticipate the intervention will be feasible and acceptable, and that participants' emotional distress will decrease, effective emotion regulation strategies increase, and suicidal thoughts decrease by the end of the six-week intervention. The investigators hope to test this intervention in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial. The proposed research marks an initial attempt at developing personalized interventions based on person-specific correlates of suicidal thoughts.

研究概览

地位

完全的

干预/治疗

详细说明

Suicide is a public health emergency: an estimated 45,979 people in the United States died by suicide in 2020, and approximately 20% of U.S. youth report having seriously contemplated suicide in the past year. Most interventions for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are developed and tested using group-level (nomothetic) approaches, which assume that all individuals experience suicidal ideation for similar reasons and respond similarly to treatment. However, individuals at high risk for suicide are highly heterogeneous, and prior idiographic (person-specific) research has shown substantial between-person variability in the daily associations between suicidal thoughts and coping strategies. This suggests that personalized interventions, tailored to an individual's unique pattern of risk and coping, may be more effective than one-size-fits-all approaches.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for self-injurious behavior, but standard DBT is resource-intensive, creating barriers to access. Brief, adjunctive interventions show promise for reducing mental health symptoms and increasing engagement with more intensive services, but existing brief options (e.g., crisis lines) are underused. There is a need for a brief intervention that retains DBT's active ingredients while being personalized and more accessible than standard care.

This study will develop and pilot test PRECISE, a brief, personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. PRECISE integrates components of DBT with idiographic statistical modeling of each participant's own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify individualized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which then guide functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted skills coaching across up to six sessions.

Aim 1 (Months 1-12): Refine the PRECISE intervention manual through expert advisory review and initial testing with 5 participants to evaluate feasibility and acceptability.

Aim 2 (Months 13-24): Conduct an open-label, non-randomized pilot trial in 30 participants to evaluate recruitment/retention feasibility, further refine the intervention, and preliminarily examine outcomes.

Eligible participants (ages 18-26, active suicidal ideation, English fluency) complete baseline assessments, then begin smartphone-based EMA surveys for the six-week intervention duration. Each session opens with a suicide risk assessment; at-risk participants complete a structured risk management protocol. Primary outcomes are change in negative emotion intensity and adaptive emotion regulation strategy use, analyzed via mixed-effects models. Secondary outcomes include suicidal ideation, coping self-efficacy, and implementation outcomes (adherence, dropout, satisfaction).

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

35

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • California
      • La Jolla、California、美国、92093
        • Stein Clinical Research Building

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-26 years
  • Endorsement of active suicidal ideation on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (score >2, or past-month thoughts of killing self)
  • English fluency
  • Willingness to provide contact information for a key support person to be contacted as part of the study's risk and safety plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to read English
  • Diagnosis of a psychotic or severe thought disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder with psychotic features)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:PRECISE
All enrolled participants receive the PRECISE intervention, a brief (up to six sessions over six weeks), personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. Sessions incorporate idiographic analysis of participants' own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify personalized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which inform functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted emotion regulation skills coaching. Each session begins with a suicide risk assessment; participants at acute risk complete a structured risk management protocol. Participants also complete smartphone-based EMA surveys multiple times daily throughout the six-week intervention period.
All enrolled participants receive the PRECISE intervention, a brief (up to six sessions over six weeks), personalized, EMA-informed adjunctive intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, delivered via secure videoconferencing by trained coaches. Sessions incorporate idiographic analysis of participants' own ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to identify personalized correlates of suicidal thoughts, which inform functional analysis, safety planning, and targeted emotion regulation skills coaching. Each session begins with a suicide risk assessment; participants at acute risk complete a structured risk management protocol. Participants also complete smartphone-based EMA surveys multiple times daily throughout the six-week intervention period.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
大体时间:Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal ideation and behavior assessed via the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), a structured interview administered by a trained assessor. The C-SSRS rates suicidal ideation along a severity continuum (from passive wish to be dead through active ideation with specific plan and intent) and separately captures suicidal behavior (actual, interrupted, and aborted attempts; preparatory acts; and non-suicidal self-injury). Ideation intensity (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, reasons for ideation) is also assessed.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal Ideation
大体时间:Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks
Suicidal ideation severity assessed via the Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation (MSSI), a clinician-administered rating scale adapted from Beck's original Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). The MSSI extends the original SSI with additional items assessing components such as desire to live, desire to die, deterrents to suicide, and courage/competence to attempt, yielding a broader assessment of ideation severity and risk than the original scale.
Baseline, 6-weeks, 12-weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Negative Emotion Intensity
大体时间:Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in self-reported negative emotion intensity, assessed via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys completed up to five times daily throughout the intervention period. These items (fear, shame, sadness, anger, guilt), measured on a 0-100 scale, are adapted from Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) with higher scores indicating greater degree of negative emotions. The Within-person trajectories of negative emotion will be analyzed using mixed-effects models to account for the nested structure of repeated EMA observations.
Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in Adaptive Emotion Regulation Strategy Use
大体时间:Baseline through 6-weeks
Change in use of adaptive (vs. maladaptive) emotion regulation strategies, calculated as a proportion score reflecting personalized strategies identified for each participant (e.g., problem-solving, cognitive reappraisal, acceptance) relative to strategies targeted for reduction (e.g., rumination, avoidance, suppression). These items are adapted from the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), with higher scores indicating greater use of maladaptive strategies relative to adaptive ones. The proportion score ranges from 0 to 1. Strategy use is tracked weekly by the treatment coach and measured via EMA. Within-person trajectories will be analyzed using mixed-effects models.
Baseline through 6-weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2024年5月23日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年9月9日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年9月9日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月31日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月31日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月11日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月9日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 806080
  • YIG-0-078-22 (其他赠款/资助编号:American Foundation for Suicide Prevention)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified individual participant data, including baseline assessment measures and aggregated ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data, will be made publicly available via GitHub (https://github.com/kskuehn) following completion of the primary analyses and manuscript preparation. Data will be stripped of direct identifiers prior to posting. This data sharing plan is described in the study's informed consent document.

IPD 共享时间框架

Mid-September 2026. Will be available indefinitely

IPD 共享访问标准

Open access

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会
  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅