이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Utilization of Guided Point of Care Ultrasound in Heart Failure Diagnosis Pilot Trial (POCUS-HF)

2026년 9월 14일 업데이트: David Mcnamara, Corewell Health West

A Pilot Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Software Guided Point-of-care

The purpose of the study is to implement point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to generate preliminary, or pilot, data to support a full future POCUS study across multiple Corewell Health outpatient rural facilities. The study aims to demonstrate feasibility of the procedure utilizing input from the patient, provider, and the clinic staff. Preliminary data will also be used to estimate the magnitude of effect in estimating sample size and power in participants who receive the POCUS procedure versus those who continue with standard of care. Up to 100 participants will be enrolled.

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

상세 설명

The Investogators will harness the power of a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device that can generate an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction in <5 minutes by medical assistants (MA) with minimal training at a single Corewell Health outpatient practice. Using a randomized clinical trial design in patients with new cardiac symptoms, POCUS-HF will quantify the benefits of using POCUS for heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis and establishment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT).

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an adaptation of formal ultrasound technology used to evaluate cardiac structure and function known as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE is conducted by a trained sonographer and is the initial imaging modality in heart failure diagnoses. POCUS is unique in that it is portable, provides real-time imaging feedback while being relatively inexpensive and accessible to users of variating level of training. POCUS is particularly well positioned to serve the growing HF community throughout Michigan and if performed in the office, may potentially shorten the time to GDMT initiation in new cases of HF. While the investigators posit that a POCUS screening tool will have the greatest impact in rural communities who are already overburdened, the POCUS-HF findings will be applicable in other urbanization levels or geographic regions across the United States, and potentially to other under resourced areas.

One area ideal for intervention is in obtaining accurate measures of left ventricular EF via TTE. In a patient with cardiac symptomatology, the typical workflow includes: 1) initial visit with one's primary care physician including referral to a cardiology specialist and ordering a TTE, 2) TTE 3) cardiology appointment to diagnose HFrEF, and 4) discussion/review of the results with the patient, 5) followed finally by the initiation of GDMT. This process is long and burdensome and is likely particularly more challenging in underserved communities that lack specialists. Thus, TTE acquisition is an ideal place for intervention to shorten this timeline.

There are many innovative components of the POCUS-HF trial including the overarching theoretical framework and the use of guided software within the POCUS device. While POCUS is not a uniquely new concept, the combination of a rigorous POCUS device with real-time software guided turn-by-turn instructions allows for novice capture of LVEF. Another innovation is that the POCUS-HF trial is designed to not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively identify barriers and optimal use cases for POCUS. The Investigators believe this will facilitate the implementation of such screening practices by other institutions and care settings. Future work will aim to define other scenarios where POCUS may be effective, such as routine monitoring of progression in HF patients, or in vascular disease diagnosis settings.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

100

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, 미국, 49503
        • Corewell Health West

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Patient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Presenting to an enrolled CH study site with visit type:
  • A. PCP - New onset cardiac complaints (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, etc)
  • B. Cardiology - New Patient
  • Weight ≥ 40kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented echocardiogram in the past 3 years
  • History of cardiac surgery or congenital heart disease
  • O2-dependent pulmonary disease
  • BMI ≥40kg/m2
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-native English speakers who have limited spoken or written understanding of the English language to be able to consent or complete surveys in English
  • Cognitively impaired individuals with a legally authorized representative or guardian

Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of verbal consent
  • Employed to work at a CH clinic where patient enrollment is planned

Exclusion:

  • Deemed inappropriate or ineligible for any reason at PI discretion

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 특수 증상
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
간섭 없음: 치료의 표준
활성 비교기: POCUS
Left ventricular Ejection fraction is estimated using a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device.
Point of care ultrasound will be used in patients as an early diagnostic tool for HFrEF

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Patient Participation Rates
기간: 1 year
Number of patients who agree to study in comparison to number of patients that decline
1 year
Medical assistant (MA) training and ability of MAs to conduct accurate POCUS-based estimates of EF
기간: 1 year
Of the medical assistant's trained for the study how many are successful at the implementation of POCUS for accurate LVEF prediction in comparison to those trained that are unsuccessful at utilizing POCUS for LVEF prediction
1 year
Clinic adherence to the protocol
기간: 1 year
The number of protocol deviations that occur during study timeframe.
1 year
Ability to conduct randomization and provide same-day POCUS results
기간: 1 year
On the day of randomization how many treatment patients receive same day POCUS results in comparison to the treatment patients that don't receive same day results
1 year
How many days between HFrEF diagnosis and initiation of GDMT protocols
기간: 1 year
For both the treatment and non-treatment groups how days between HFeEF diagnosis and the start of GDMT protocols
1 year
Implementation and completion rates of patient and provider quantitative and qualitative questionnaires on the burden and benefits of using POCUS in a clinical setting
기간: 1 year
Number of questionnaires filled out in comparison to the number of blank or missed questionnaires.
1 year

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Magnitude of effect between pocus treatment and standard of care on the time to HFrEF diagnosis and GDMT initiation.
기간: 2 years
Quantifying the magnitude/sample size/power needed to estimate enrollment for potential full trial
2 years
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 1-week
기간: 1-week
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
1-week
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 3-month
기간: 3 Months
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
3 Months
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up outpatient visits
기간: 1 year
Differences in number of follow up outpatient visits
1 year
Healthcare utilization after randomization Emergency room visits
기간: 1-year
Number of patient ER visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up inpatient visits
기간: 1-year
Number of inpatient visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization GDMT prescriptions
기간: 1-year
Number of patients prescribed GDMT therapy
1-year

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: David McNamara, MD, MPh, Corewell Health West

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 9월 30일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 9월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2028년 9월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 1월 8일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 9월 14일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 18일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 9월 18일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 9월 14일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2025-1219

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

예

미국에서 제조되어 미국에서 수출되는 제품

예

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다