Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Utilization of Guided Point of Care Ultrasound in Heart Failure Diagnosis Pilot Trial (POCUS-HF)

14 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: David Mcnamara, Corewell Health West

A Pilot Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Software Guided Point-of-care

The purpose of the study is to implement point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to generate preliminary, or pilot, data to support a full future POCUS study across multiple Corewell Health outpatient rural facilities. The study aims to demonstrate feasibility of the procedure utilizing input from the patient, provider, and the clinic staff. Preliminary data will also be used to estimate the magnitude of effect in estimating sample size and power in participants who receive the POCUS procedure versus those who continue with standard of care. Up to 100 participants will be enrolled.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The Investogators will harness the power of a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device that can generate an accurate estimate of left ventricular ejection fraction in <5 minutes by medical assistants (MA) with minimal training at a single Corewell Health outpatient practice. Using a randomized clinical trial design in patients with new cardiac symptoms, POCUS-HF will quantify the benefits of using POCUS for heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis and establishment of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT).

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an adaptation of formal ultrasound technology used to evaluate cardiac structure and function known as transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TTE is conducted by a trained sonographer and is the initial imaging modality in heart failure diagnoses. POCUS is unique in that it is portable, provides real-time imaging feedback while being relatively inexpensive and accessible to users of variating level of training. POCUS is particularly well positioned to serve the growing HF community throughout Michigan and if performed in the office, may potentially shorten the time to GDMT initiation in new cases of HF. While the investigators posit that a POCUS screening tool will have the greatest impact in rural communities who are already overburdened, the POCUS-HF findings will be applicable in other urbanization levels or geographic regions across the United States, and potentially to other under resourced areas.

One area ideal for intervention is in obtaining accurate measures of left ventricular EF via TTE. In a patient with cardiac symptomatology, the typical workflow includes: 1) initial visit with one's primary care physician including referral to a cardiology specialist and ordering a TTE, 2) TTE 3) cardiology appointment to diagnose HFrEF, and 4) discussion/review of the results with the patient, 5) followed finally by the initiation of GDMT. This process is long and burdensome and is likely particularly more challenging in underserved communities that lack specialists. Thus, TTE acquisition is an ideal place for intervention to shorten this timeline.

There are many innovative components of the POCUS-HF trial including the overarching theoretical framework and the use of guided software within the POCUS device. While POCUS is not a uniquely new concept, the combination of a rigorous POCUS device with real-time software guided turn-by-turn instructions allows for novice capture of LVEF. Another innovation is that the POCUS-HF trial is designed to not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively identify barriers and optimal use cases for POCUS. The Investigators believe this will facilitate the implementation of such screening practices by other institutions and care settings. Future work will aim to define other scenarios where POCUS may be effective, such as routine monitoring of progression in HF patients, or in vascular disease diagnosis settings.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

100

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, États-Unis, 49503
        • Corewell Health West

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Patient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Presenting to an enrolled CH study site with visit type:
  • A. PCP - New onset cardiac complaints (e.g., dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea, etc)
  • B. Cardiology - New Patient
  • Weight ≥ 40kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented echocardiogram in the past 3 years
  • History of cardiac surgery or congenital heart disease
  • O2-dependent pulmonary disease
  • BMI ≥40kg/m2
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-native English speakers who have limited spoken or written understanding of the English language to be able to consent or complete surveys in English
  • Cognitively impaired individuals with a legally authorized representative or guardian

Staff Participant Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion:

  • 18 years of age or older at time of verbal consent
  • Employed to work at a CH clinic where patient enrollment is planned

Exclusion:

  • Deemed inappropriate or ineligible for any reason at PI discretion

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Norme de soins
Comparateur actif: POCUS
Left ventricular Ejection fraction is estimated using a novel turn-by-turn guidance software embedded within a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) device.
Point of care ultrasound will be used in patients as an early diagnostic tool for HFrEF

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Patient Participation Rates
Délai: 1 year
Number of patients who agree to study in comparison to number of patients that decline
1 year
Medical assistant (MA) training and ability of MAs to conduct accurate POCUS-based estimates of EF
Délai: 1 year
Of the medical assistant's trained for the study how many are successful at the implementation of POCUS for accurate LVEF prediction in comparison to those trained that are unsuccessful at utilizing POCUS for LVEF prediction
1 year
Clinic adherence to the protocol
Délai: 1 year
The number of protocol deviations that occur during study timeframe.
1 year
Ability to conduct randomization and provide same-day POCUS results
Délai: 1 year
On the day of randomization how many treatment patients receive same day POCUS results in comparison to the treatment patients that don't receive same day results
1 year
How many days between HFrEF diagnosis and initiation of GDMT protocols
Délai: 1 year
For both the treatment and non-treatment groups how days between HFeEF diagnosis and the start of GDMT protocols
1 year
Implementation and completion rates of patient and provider quantitative and qualitative questionnaires on the burden and benefits of using POCUS in a clinical setting
Délai: 1 year
Number of questionnaires filled out in comparison to the number of blank or missed questionnaires.
1 year

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Magnitude of effect between pocus treatment and standard of care on the time to HFrEF diagnosis and GDMT initiation.
Délai: 2 years
Quantifying the magnitude/sample size/power needed to estimate enrollment for potential full trial
2 years
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 1-week
Délai: 1-week
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
1-week
Difference in patient-level POCUS burden 3-month
Délai: 3 Months
Patient level burden will be determined using the Likert-scale (zero burden to burdensome)
3 Months
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up outpatient visits
Délai: 1 year
Differences in number of follow up outpatient visits
1 year
Healthcare utilization after randomization Emergency room visits
Délai: 1-year
Number of patient ER visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization follow up inpatient visits
Délai: 1-year
Number of inpatient visits
1-year
Healthcare utilization after randomization GDMT prescriptions
Délai: 1-year
Number of patients prescribed GDMT therapy
1-year

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: David McNamara, MD, MPh, Corewell Health West

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

30 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

30 septembre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 septembre 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

8 janvier 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

18 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

18 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2025-1219

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Oui

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner