A Study of Vemurafenib in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
2017年6月26日 更新者：Hoffmann-La Roche
An Open-label Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Continuous Oral Dosing of Vemurafenib on Tumour Response in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
This open-label single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Vemurafenib in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma.
Patients will receive oral Vemurafenib [RG7204; PLEXXIKON: PLX4032] at a dose of 960 mg b.i.d.
continuously until disease progression or withdrawal from study and will be assessed at regular intervals for tumour response and tolerability.
Target sample size is <100 patients.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
132
阶段
- 阶段2
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
New South Wales
-
Newcastle、New South Wales、澳大利亚、2298
- Calvary Mater Newcastle; Melanoma Clinic
-
Westmead、New South Wales、澳大利亚、2145
- Westmead Hospital; Medical Oncology and Pallative Care
-
-
Victoria
-
Melbourne、Victoria、澳大利亚、3000
- Peter Maccallum Cancer Institute; Medical Oncology
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles、California、美国、90095-6984
- UCLA - School of Medicine; Division of Hematology/Oncology
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver、Colorado、美国、80262
- University of Colorado
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa、Florida、美国、33612
- Moffitt Cancer Center
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02115
- Dana Farber Cancer Inst. ; Dept. of Medical Oncology
-
Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital;Hematology/ Oncology
-
-
New York
-
New York、New York、美国、10036
- New York University Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、美国、19104-4283
- Hospital of the Uni of Pennsylvania; Section of Hematology/Oncology
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15213
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville、Tennessee、美国、37232
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Ctr
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas、Texas、美国、75246
- Texas Oncology-Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
-
Houston、Texas、美国、77030
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- adult patients >/=18 years of age
- histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma (Stage IV, AJCC)
- patients must have completed and failed at least one prior standard of care regimen (e.g. DTIC, temozolomide, etc.)
- BRAF V600E positive mutation (by Roche CoDx BRAF mutation assay)
- measurable disease by RECIST criteria
- negative pregnancy test and, for fertile men and women, effective contraception during treatment and for 6 months after completion
Exclusion Criteria:
- active CNS metastases on CT/MRI within 28 days prior to enrollment
- history of or known carcinomatous meningitis
- previous treatment with BRAF (sorafenib allowed) or MEK inhibitor
- cardiac dysrhythmias >2 NCI CTCAE or treatment with drugs with dysrhythmic potential
- uncontrolled hypertension(>150/100mmHg) despite optimal medical therapy
- infectious disease including HIV, HBV and HCV
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：单臂
|
960 mg b.i.d.
continuous oral dosing
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
Patients who never received study treatment and treated patients without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders.
CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion.
Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm.
PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesion.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR) Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
Patients who never received study treatment and treated patients without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders.
CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions, and no new lesion.
Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to <10 mm.
PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesion.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Duration of Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
Duration of response was defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression (PD) or death, only for those patients whose best overall response was complete response or partial response.
PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to Nadir (smallest sum of diameters on-study), unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesion.
For patients who were alive without progression, duration of response was censored on the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Time to Response Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
Time to response was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of the first documentation of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever occurred first.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by an Independent Review Committee Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
PFS was defined the time interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Deaths that occurred in patients without disease progression were considered to be a PFS event on the date of death.
Patients who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to the data cutoff date.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Overall Survival
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death.
For patients who were alive at the time of analysis, overall survival was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive prior to the data cutoff date.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Improvement in Physical Symptoms (Improvement in Physician's Assessment of Global Performance Status and Oxygen Saturation Requirements, and Decrease in Total Dose and Frequency of Narcotic Pain Analgesics) During Treatment in Comparison to Baseline
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
Three parameters were measured.
(1) Improvement in the Physician's Assessment of Global Performance status on a 7-point scale (1=very much better to 7=very much worse).
(2) Improvement in oxygen saturation requirements, defined as a clinically meaningful increase in oxygen saturation requirement (from a baseline value < 95% to ≥ 95% saturation using a pulse oximeter).
(3) A decrease in total dose and frequency of narcotic pain analgesics.
The percentage of patients showing improvement (1 and 2) or a decrease (3) are reported.
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
|
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Vemurafenib on Day 15 of Cycle 1
大体时间：Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
|
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis (Win Non-Lin).
|
Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
|
|
Vemurafenib Plasma Level Area Under the Curve From 0 to 8 Hours (AUC0-8h) on Day 15 of Cycle 1
大体时间：Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
|
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis (Win Non-Lin).
AUC0-8h was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule.
|
Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose on Day 15 of Cycle 1
|
|
Vemurafenib Plasma Levels at Various Treatment Cycles
大体时间：Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to 4 hours post-dose Cycle 10 Day 1
|
Blood samples for assessing the concentration of vemurafenib in plasma were drawn before the morning dose and 4 hours post-dose at Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10.
Each Cycle was 3 weeks in duration.
|
Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to 4 hours post-dose Cycle 10 Day 1
|
|
Time-matched Change From Baseline in the Study Specific Corrected QT Interval (QTcP)
大体时间：Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to pre-dose Cycle 6 Day 1
|
Three electrocardiograms (ECG) were obtained pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 and again pre-dose and 4 hours post-dose at various Cycles throughout treatment.
Five baseline triplicate ECGs were obtained before the start of treatment at the same time points used during treatment.
Reported is the largest mean time-matched QTcP change from baseline.
QTcP=QT/(60/heart rate)^β (β=mean [calculated separately for males and females] log-transformed QT versus log-transformed RR regression slopes using all available pre-treatment (baseline) ECG values.
|
Pre-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 to pre-dose Cycle 6 Day 1
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Adverse Event
大体时间：From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
The intensity of adverse events was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a 5-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening, and Death).
|
From first treatment through September 27, 2010
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
- Frederick DT, Salas Fragomeni RA, Schalck A, Ferreiro-Neira I, Hoff T, Cooper ZA, Haq R, Panka DJ, Kwong LN, Davies MA, Cusack JC, Flaherty KT, Fisher DE, Mier JW, Wargo JA, Sullivan RJ. Clinical profiling of BCL-2 family members in the setting of BRAF inhibition offers a rationale for targeting de novo resistance using BH3 mimetics. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101286. eCollection 2014.
- Lacouture ME, Duvic M, Hauschild A, Prieto VG, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Kim CC, McCormack CJ, Myskowski PL, Spleiss O, Trunzer K, Su F, Nelson B, Nolop KB, Grippo JF, Lee RJ, Klimek MJ, Troy JL, Joe AK. Analysis of dermatologic events in vemurafenib-treated patients with melanoma. Oncologist. 2013;18(3):314-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0333. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
- Ascierto PA, Ribas A, Larkin J, McArthur GA, Lewis KD, Hauschild A, Flaherty KT, McKenna E, Zhu Q, Mun Y, Dreno B. Impact of initial treatment and prognostic factors on postprogression survival in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine or vemurafenib +/- cobimetinib: a pooled analysis of four clinical trials. J Transl Med. 2020 Aug 3;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02458-x.
- Sosman JA, Kim KB, Schuchter L, Gonzalez R, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, McArthur GA, Hutson TE, Moschos SJ, Flaherty KT, Hersey P, Kefford R, Lawrence D, Puzanov I, Lewis KD, Amaravadi RK, Chmielowski B, Lawrence HJ, Shyr Y, Ye F, Li J, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Ribas A. Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112302.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2009年9月30日
初级完成 (实际的)
2010年9月27日
研究完成 (实际的)
2014年6月3日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2009年7月28日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2009年7月29日
首次发布 (估计)
2009年7月30日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年7月25日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年6月26日
最后验证
2017年6月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.