此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

ShuntCheck Versus Radionuclide in Evaluating Shunt Function in Symptomatic NPH Patients (SCNPH)

2015年10月19日 更新者:NeuroDx Development

A Double- Blinded Comparison of the Accuracy of ShuntCheck, a Non-Invasive Device, to Radionuclide Shunt Patency Test in Evaluating Shunt Function in Patients With Adult Hydrocephalus With Possible Shunt Obstruction

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of ShuntCheck (SC) and ShuntCheck plus Micro-Pumper (SC+MP) to radionuclide shunt patency testing (SPS) in evaluating shunt function in patients with adult hydrocephalus (AH) implanted with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts when shunt obstruction is suspected and a diagnostic procedure such as radionuclide shunt patency testing (SPS) is required.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

详细说明

The primary objective is to demonstrate that the accuracy of SC and SC+MP for determining whether a VP shunt is patent or obstructed is statistically no different than the accuracy of the accepted standard test, radionuclide shunt patency study, when performed simultaneously.

A secondary objective is to determine SC and SC+MP results in the presence of possible partial obstruction, which defined as subjects with radionuclide clearance measured by T1/2 of 8 to 10 minutes.

A secondary objective is to compare ShuntCheck flow rate results to simultaneous radionuclide clearance as measured by T1/2. A secondary objective is to demonstrate that ShuntCheck flow rate results are statistically equivalent to simultaneous radionuclide clearance measured by T1/2

研究类型

介入性

注册 (预期的)

20

阶段

  • 第四阶段

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore、Maryland、美国、21215
        • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

35年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult men or women > 35 years of age;
  2. Capable of providing valid signed informed consent, or has a legal guardian, health care agent, or surrogate decision maker (according to local statutes, and collectively referred to as "surrogates" in this protocol) capable of providing valid, signed informed consent;
  3. Possess a shunt placed for AH;
  4. A radionuclide shunt patency study has been ordered because of suspected shunt obstruction
  5. Subject is willing and able to return to the treating physician for evaluation of the outcome of the shunt patency study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of multiple shunts, or presence of more than one distal shunt catheter (regardless of function) crossing the clavicle ipsilateral to the shunt with suspected obstruction;
  2. ShuntCheck test would interfere with standard patient care, or emergency shunt surgery that cannot be delayed is indicated;
  3. Presence of an interfering open wound or edema over any portion of the VP shunt;
  4. Subject is unwilling or unable to return to the treating physician for the SPS and ShuntCheck testing.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:诊断
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Radionuclide SPS
Radionuclide Shunt Patency Study
Non-invasive, thermal dilution test for CSF shunt flow compared to radionuclide shunt patency testing
其他名称:
  • ShuntCheck

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Sensitivity and specificity of ShuntCheck vs SPS
大体时间:Day 1

The primary efficacy objective is the sensitivity and specificity of the ShuntCheck test.

The performance of ShuntCheck test will be compared to the radionuclide scanning done on the day of ShuntCheck administration. Primary efficacy of the SC and SC+MP test will be determined by comparing SC and SC+MP performance to results of radionuclide scanning according to a standard 2 x 2 table, with a Positive test result defined as evidence of shunt obstruction.

Day 1

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Michael A Williams, MD、Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health
  • 学习椅:Sherman C Stein, MD、NeuroDx Development
  • 研究主任:Marek Swoboda, PhD、NeuroDx Development

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2011年6月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年6月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2011年3月21日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2011年3月24日

首次发布 (估计)

2011年3月28日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年10月20日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年10月19日

最后验证

2015年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • NDxDev-SCMP-2012
  • R43NS067770-01A1 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅