IntelliCare in College Students (ICCS)
2020年9月14日 更新者：Emily G Lattie、Northwestern University
Expanding College Student Mental Health With Stress Management Mobile Technologies - Extended Usability Trial
This study is an 8-week usability and feasibility trial of the smartphone student stress-management app IntelliCare for college students.
This intervention will be tested with University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and Northern Illinois University (NIU) students.
During this period, research surveys assessing depression and anxiety can be completed on the app.
Also, user feedback interviews will be conducted viatelephone at four weeks and at eight weeks to gain insight on the user experience of IntelliCare for College Students.
研究概览
详细说明
In this study, students will be recruited for an 8-week trial in which they will be given the IntelliCare Hub app and encouraged to use it daily.
To ensure a sample representative of likely end users, 10 students from each site will be recruited: 5 with elevated distress as measured by scores > 10 on either the PHQ-9 or GAD-7 and 5 without elevated scores on either measure, for a total of 20 participants.
The rationale for 10 participants in each group is based on past usability research indicating saturation is typically reached within 10 participants.
This trial aims to identify software bugs and usability problems that emerge over extended use and to examine preliminary effects of program use.
During the trial, participants will be prompted to complete the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 every week.
At baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, participants will be prompted within the app to complete the Depression Literacy Questionnaire and Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire to measure mental health literacy, the Knowledge and Beliefs about Services scale to measure knowledge of campus mental health services, the Barriers to Mental Health Help-Seeking questionnaire to measure treatment barriers, and the Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale to measure cognitive and behavioral coping skills.
At 4 and 8 weeks participants will be asked to participate in a user-feedback interview via the telephone.
This is to gain insight on the user's experience with the app.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
20
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago、Illinois、美国、60611
- Northwestern University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant is a student at the University of Illinois in Chicago or Northern Illinois University. Participant owns a smartphone capable of running Android 7 (or higher) or iOS11 (or higher).
Participant is 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria:
None
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：支持治疗
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Extended usability of a mobile self-help intervention
Participants will have open access to the Intellicare Hub app for 8-weeks and be surveyed at Baseline, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks
|
During the trial, participants will use Intellicare apps for up to 8 weeks and will be invited to provide feedback about their experience at two follow-up time points: weeks 4 and 8.
All participants will first undergo initial assessments that will include a series of online questionnaires about their mood.
Eligible participants will receive up to 8 weeks of access to the IntelliCare system, which consists of apps with a variety of resources, including lessons and tools designed to teach skills for mood management.
It is suggested that participants utilize the mobile phone tools every day
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) - Depression Severity Module
大体时间：Week 4
|
The PHQ-8 measures degree of depression severity. Possible range of scores for the PHQ-8 is 0-24. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 0-4 indicate minimal or no depression; 5-9 is mild; 10-14 is moderate; 15-19 is moderately severe; and 20-24 is severe. |
Week 4
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) - Depression Severity Module
大体时间：Week 8
|
The PHQ-8 measures degree of depression severity. Possible range of scores for the PHQ-9 is 0-24. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Specifically, scores of 0-4 indicate minimal or no depression; 5-9 is mild; 10-14 is moderate; 15-19 is moderately severe; and 20-24 is severe. |
Week 8
|
|
GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7)
大体时间：Week 4
|
The GAD-7 is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity.
GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Specifically, scores of 1-4 indicate minimal anxiety symptoms; 5-9 is mild anxiety symptoms; 10-14 is moderate anxiety symptoms; and 15-21 is severe anxiety symptoms.
|
Week 4
|
|
GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7)
大体时间：Week 8
|
The GAD-7 is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity.
GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Specifically, scores of 1-4 indicate minimal anxiety symptoms; 5-9 is mild anxiety symptoms; 10-14 is moderate anxiety symptoms; and 15-21 is severe anxiety symptoms.
|
Week 8
|
|
Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire
大体时间：Week 4
|
This questionnaire is designed to assess anxiety specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety (e.g., "Being easily fatigued may be a symptom of anxiety disorder.")
Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false.
Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety specific mental health literacy.
|
Week 4
|
|
Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire
大体时间：Week 8
|
This questionnaire is designed to assess anxiety specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety (e.g., "Being easily fatigued may be a symptom of anxiety disorder.")
Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false.
Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety specific mental health literacy.
|
Week 8
|
|
Depression Literacy Questionnaire
大体时间：Week 4
|
This questionnaire is designed to assess depression specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety and depression (e.g., "Loss of confidence and poor self-esteem may be a symptom of depression.")
Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false.
Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater depression specific mental health literacy
|
Week 4
|
|
Depression Literacy Questionnaire
大体时间：Week 8
|
This questionnaire is designed to assess depression specific mental health literacy by presenting 22 true or false statements regarding anxiety and depression (e.g., "Loss of confidence and poor self-esteem may be a symptom of depression.")
Participants receive a score of 1 for each statement they correctly assign as either true or false.
Scores for each questionnaire can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater depression specific mental health literacy
|
Week 8
|
|
Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale
大体时间：Week 4
|
This is an 18-item scale designed to measure the use and helpfulness of various cognitive and behavioral skills.
There are four subscales included: cognitive skill frequency, cognitive skill usefulness, behavioral skill frequency, and behavioral skill usefulness.
For each cognitive or behavioral skill, participants rate how often they used the skill and how helpful it was (e.g.
"During the past month, how often did you take a moment to notice things that made you feel good or grateful?
How helpful was this in making you feel better?").
Scores for cognitive subscales range from 0-24, and scores from behavioral subscales can range from 0-30.
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
Week 4
|
|
The Cognitive and Behavioral Response to Stress Scale
大体时间：Week 8
|
This is an 18-item scale designed to measure the use and helpfulness of various cognitive and behavioral skills.
There are four subscales included: cognitive skill frequency, cognitive skill usefulness, behavioral skill frequency, and behavioral skill usefulness.
For each cognitive or behavioral skill, participants rate how often they used the skill and how helpful it was (e.g.
"During the past month, how often did you take a moment to notice things that made you feel good or grateful?
How helpful was this in making you feel better?").
Scores for cognitive subscales range from 0-24, and scores from behavioral subscales can range from 0-30.
Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
|
Week 8
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Treatment App Use Sessions
大体时间：Daily for two months
|
Daily for two months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2019年7月8日
初级完成 (实际的)
2019年11月5日
研究完成 (实际的)
2019年11月5日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2019年7月23日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2019年7月25日
首次发布 (实际的)
2019年7月29日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2020年10月8日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2020年9月14日
最后验证
2020年9月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.