Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Improving Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Improving Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial
n 2015, the International Diabetes Federation estimated that there were nearly 110 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in China, which was the highest number recorded in the world. China's DM-related costs, ranked second highest globally, were estimated to be US$51 billion. In response to the rising patient numbers and costs, the Chinese government has invested heavily in primary healthcare since 2009, with the goal of improving chronic disease management in the primary care settings. A key part of the primary care improvement program prioritizes health education as a route to lifestyle modification. Although the content and modes of delivery vary enormously, most of the programs focused on providing information rather than facilitating patient change. The impacts of traditional patient education on lifestyle modification and changes in psychological status have been reported to be suboptimal. These may be related to the poor understanding of the educational content or lack of means for making changes as a result of low socioeconomic status and poor educational level. It is therefore necessary to rethink and explore a more structured, patient-centered approach to health education at improving the outcomes of DM control.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, patient-centered counseling approach that aims to elicit behavior change. Counselors use empathy and other techniques to create an atmosphere to help patients to explore the discrepancies between the goals and their current behavior. The focus of MI is to find and resolve the ambivalence, improve patients' perception of the importance of behavior change, and support them to make the change. MI provides a structural framework with guiding principles that can be easily followed by the primary care doctors. Some studies show that MI can contribute to improve healthy eating, weight control and increases in physical activity, but most research focused on intermediate outcome measures and did not evaluate the readiness to change. MI can be utilized by a variety of healthcare providers, which makes it adaptable for different culture and clinical settings. However, the effectiveness of MI in Chinese diabetic patients remains uncertain.
MI has been delivered using different methods. These methods have varied and included a single one-to-one session with a therapist, multiple group sessions, and the incorporation of MI into daily clinical practice. Furthermore, in yet another study, MI education program produced a significantly greater change in patients' perceived competence in dealing with diabetes than the control group. In this study, the investigators adopted the group MI approach and developed a patient empowerment program (PEP) utilizing the techniques and framework of MI. The investigators compared this to the most common form of DM education in China, i.e., when health professionals (nurses, doctors, dietitians or pharmacists) give a lecture on DM to patients and their carers in a hospital lecture theatre in a didactic manner.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Background: To assess the effects of a motivational interviewing (MI)-based patient empowerment program (PEP) on type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patient self-management compared to traditional diabetes health education.
Methods: Two hundred and twenty-five patients, recruited from community health centers (CHCs) and the family medicine clinic in the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital in Shenzhen, were randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session PEP in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. The control group (n=108) received the traditional lecture-style health education on DM. All the patients were followed up for three months. Outcomes included problem areas in diabetes (PAID) that measures diabetes-related emotional distress, patient enablement index (PEI), mental health, patient satisfaction respectively as well as lifestyle behaviors were assessed at baseline, post-activity and three months.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Type 2 diabetes with HbA1c between 7-10%, 18-75 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known severe comorbidities or complications, such as cancer, unstable angina, frequent exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetic retinopathy, Illiterate or not cognitively competent enough to understand written and the oral expression of the language native to the study site.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:卫生服务研究
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:Motivational interviewing
The intervention group received an education program in small groups that included no more than ten members.
The content was designed based on MI theory and the theory of patient empowerment.
Program content was further informed by the Hospital Authority Patient Empowerment Program in Hong Kong.
The education program consisted of four modules, held once a week, that each lasted approximately 1½ to 2 hours.
They were grouped under the following four broad headings: Knowing Diabetes, Diabetes Self-Care, Healthy Diet and Physical Exercise.
Each module started with a brief introduction to relevant background knowledge, which was followed by small-group discussions about personal barriers and techniques for overcoming challenges.
During the small group discussions, educators acted as MI facilitators, using group MI techniques to strengthen participants' motivation.
|
Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session patient empowerment program in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. he control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
|
|
安慰剂比较:Traditional lectures
The control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
In order to minimize intervention bias, the control group lectures were standardized and adapted into four modules, namely knowing diabetes, healthy diet, physical exercises, and how to use medication correctly, which were similar topic headings, durations and frequencies to those of the intervention group.
Each lecture was 1 hour and was provided by one of four health professionals (a pharmacist, dietician, endocrinologist or nurse) who had never received any prior training in MI.
|
Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session patient empowerment program in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. he control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire
大体时间:4 months
|
PAID is a self-administered 20-item scale.
Each item is scored from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (serious problem).
The PAID scale has been widely used in many countries to assess diabetes-related emotional distress.
|
4 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
"Patient Enablement Index" (PEI) score
大体时间:4 months
|
The PEI is a scale that measures patients' enablement, it was also used to measure patient enablement in this study.
The PEI scale had been validated in the Chinese population.
|
4 months
|
|
Stages of Change score
大体时间:4 months
|
The Stages of Change score is a score that assess participants' readiness to change in behaviors such as smoking, drinking or exercise and their adherence to treatment.
|
4 months
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Jingya Yan、WHO Health Promoting Hospital Office, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
- 首席研究员:Wei Liang、Endocrinology Department, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.