- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT04342845
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Improving Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Improving Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial
n 2015, the International Diabetes Federation estimated that there were nearly 110 million diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in China, which was the highest number recorded in the world. China's DM-related costs, ranked second highest globally, were estimated to be US$51 billion. In response to the rising patient numbers and costs, the Chinese government has invested heavily in primary healthcare since 2009, with the goal of improving chronic disease management in the primary care settings. A key part of the primary care improvement program prioritizes health education as a route to lifestyle modification. Although the content and modes of delivery vary enormously, most of the programs focused on providing information rather than facilitating patient change. The impacts of traditional patient education on lifestyle modification and changes in psychological status have been reported to be suboptimal. These may be related to the poor understanding of the educational content or lack of means for making changes as a result of low socioeconomic status and poor educational level. It is therefore necessary to rethink and explore a more structured, patient-centered approach to health education at improving the outcomes of DM control.
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, patient-centered counseling approach that aims to elicit behavior change. Counselors use empathy and other techniques to create an atmosphere to help patients to explore the discrepancies between the goals and their current behavior. The focus of MI is to find and resolve the ambivalence, improve patients' perception of the importance of behavior change, and support them to make the change. MI provides a structural framework with guiding principles that can be easily followed by the primary care doctors. Some studies show that MI can contribute to improve healthy eating, weight control and increases in physical activity, but most research focused on intermediate outcome measures and did not evaluate the readiness to change. MI can be utilized by a variety of healthcare providers, which makes it adaptable for different culture and clinical settings. However, the effectiveness of MI in Chinese diabetic patients remains uncertain.
MI has been delivered using different methods. These methods have varied and included a single one-to-one session with a therapist, multiple group sessions, and the incorporation of MI into daily clinical practice. Furthermore, in yet another study, MI education program produced a significantly greater change in patients' perceived competence in dealing with diabetes than the control group. In this study, the investigators adopted the group MI approach and developed a patient empowerment program (PEP) utilizing the techniques and framework of MI. The investigators compared this to the most common form of DM education in China, i.e., when health professionals (nurses, doctors, dietitians or pharmacists) give a lecture on DM to patients and their carers in a hospital lecture theatre in a didactic manner.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Background: To assess the effects of a motivational interviewing (MI)-based patient empowerment program (PEP) on type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patient self-management compared to traditional diabetes health education.
Methods: Two hundred and twenty-five patients, recruited from community health centers (CHCs) and the family medicine clinic in the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital in Shenzhen, were randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session PEP in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. The control group (n=108) received the traditional lecture-style health education on DM. All the patients were followed up for three months. Outcomes included problem areas in diabetes (PAID) that measures diabetes-related emotional distress, patient enablement index (PEI), mental health, patient satisfaction respectively as well as lifestyle behaviors were assessed at baseline, post-activity and three months.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Type 2 diabetes with HbA1c between 7-10%, 18-75 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known severe comorbidities or complications, such as cancer, unstable angina, frequent exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetic retinopathy, Illiterate or not cognitively competent enough to understand written and the oral expression of the language native to the study site.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Motivational interviewing
The intervention group received an education program in small groups that included no more than ten members.
The content was designed based on MI theory and the theory of patient empowerment.
Program content was further informed by the Hospital Authority Patient Empowerment Program in Hong Kong.
The education program consisted of four modules, held once a week, that each lasted approximately 1½ to 2 hours.
They were grouped under the following four broad headings: Knowing Diabetes, Diabetes Self-Care, Healthy Diet and Physical Exercise.
Each module started with a brief introduction to relevant background knowledge, which was followed by small-group discussions about personal barriers and techniques for overcoming challenges.
During the small group discussions, educators acted as MI facilitators, using group MI techniques to strengthen participants' motivation.
|
Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session patient empowerment program in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. he control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
|
|
Comparador de Placebo: Traditional lectures
The control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
In order to minimize intervention bias, the control group lectures were standardized and adapted into four modules, namely knowing diabetes, healthy diet, physical exercises, and how to use medication correctly, which were similar topic headings, durations and frequencies to those of the intervention group.
Each lecture was 1 hour and was provided by one of four health professionals (a pharmacist, dietician, endocrinologist or nurse) who had never received any prior training in MI.
|
Patients in the intervention group (n=117) received a four-session patient empowerment program in small groups over one month by trained nurses and doctors. he control group received traditional lectures that consisted solely of conveying healthcare information to patients.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire
Prazo: 4 months
|
PAID is a self-administered 20-item scale.
Each item is scored from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (serious problem).
The PAID scale has been widely used in many countries to assess diabetes-related emotional distress.
|
4 months
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
"Patient Enablement Index" (PEI) score
Prazo: 4 months
|
The PEI is a scale that measures patients' enablement, it was also used to measure patient enablement in this study.
The PEI scale had been validated in the Chinese population.
|
4 months
|
|
Stages of Change score
Prazo: 4 months
|
The Stages of Change score is a score that assess participants' readiness to change in behaviors such as smoking, drinking or exercise and their adherence to treatment.
|
4 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Jingya Yan, WHO Health Promoting Hospital Office, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
- Investigador principal: Wei Liang, Endocrinology Department, The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- JCYJ20150331142757385
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .