Promoting Interventions for Climate Change to Upscale Resilience in District Badin (PICCTURE)
Promoting Interventions for Climate Change to Upscale Resilience (PICCTURE) Trial in District Badin
研究概览
详细说明
District Badin, located in the lower Indus delta of Pakistan, is highly exposed to recurrent climate-related hazards, including riverine and coastal flooding, cyclones, saline water intrusion, and increasing temperatures. These hazards interact with underlying structural vulnerabilities such as low-lying topography, reliance on agriculture and fisheries, and constrained access to health and social services-resulting in compounded risks to health, nutrition, and livelihoods. This context provides a suitable setting to evaluate integrated, community-based strategies aimed at strengthening resilience to climate-related shocks.
This study is guided by a multidimensional resilience framework that conceptualizes resilience as a function of coping, adaptive, and transformative capacities across social, economic, environmental, and health domains. The intervention package is informed by prior vulnerability assessments and designed to address key modifiable determinants of resilience, including disaster preparedness, livelihood security, financial risk management, and access to essential health services.
The intervention is delivered through two implementation models that differ in the degree of health system integration. The first model utilizes community-led platforms established through Village Management Committees (VMCs), which are locally constituted groups representing diverse segments of the community. These committees facilitate participatory learning and action processes, enabling communities to identify risks, prioritize solutions, and implement locally appropriate adaptation strategies. Core components include structured training on disaster risk reduction, development of community hazard maps and early warning mechanisms, promotion of climate-resilient livelihood options, and strengthening of household-level financial planning and emergency preparedness.
The second model builds on the community platform by incorporating structured engagement with Lady Health Workers (LHWs) and primary healthcare providers. This integrated approach is intended to strengthen linkages between communities and the formal health system, enhance delivery of climate-sensitive health messaging, improve identification and support of high-risk households, and facilitate continuity of care during climate-related events. Health system engagement also includes co-facilitation of selected community sessions, alignment of community preparedness plans with facility-level response mechanisms, and promotion of climate-responsive service delivery practices.
Intervention activities are implemented over a 12-month period using a standardized curriculum adapted to the local context. Delivery follows a phased approach, with more intensive engagement during the initial months followed by reinforcement sessions. Participatory group sessions, simulation exercises, and community mobilization activities are used to enhance knowledge, build skills, and support behavior change. Implementation fidelity is supported through structured training of facilitators, supervision, routine monitoring, and the use of standardized tools and materials.
Evaluation is conducted using repeated cross-sectional household surveys administered at baseline and endline to assess changes in resilience and vulnerability across multiple domains. Data collection includes measures of household preparedness, livelihood strategies, financial coping mechanisms, health-seeking behavior, and selected health and nutrition indicators. Process evaluation is embedded within the study to assess intervention delivery, including coverage, participation, adherence to planned activities, and functionality of community-level preparedness mechanisms such as emergency plans and early warning systems. These measures enable assessment of both implementation fidelity and intermediate pathways of impact.
To capture the effectiveness of interventions under real-world stress conditions, a rapid assessment component is incorporated. In the event of a major climate-related hazard affecting study areas during the implementation period, targeted data collection will be conducted shortly after the event to document community responses, functioning of preparedness systems, and access to essential services. This component is intended to complement routine evaluation by providing insight into intervention performance during actual shocks.
The analytical approach follows an intention-to-treat framework, whereby all households are analyzed according to their assigned study group regardless of level of participation. Intervention effects will be estimated using mixed-effects regression models to account for clustering at the community level and potential intra-cluster correlation. A difference-in-differences specification will be applied to compare changes over time between study groups, enabling estimation of intervention effects while controlling for baseline differences and secular trends. Models will incorporate fixed effects for time and study group, as well as interaction terms to estimate differential changes attributable to the intervention. Relevant household- and cluster-level covariates will be included to improve precision and adjust for residual confounding.
Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of findings to model specification and potential sources of bias, including differential attrition and variation in intervention exposure. Process indicators will be analyzed descriptively and, where appropriate, linked to outcome measures to explore potential mechanisms of effect.
This study is designed to generate rigorous evidence on the effectiveness of integrated community-based and health system-linked approaches to strengthening climate resilience in vulnerable populations. Findings are expected to inform the design and scale-up of adaptation strategies in similar climate-affected, resource-constrained settings.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Akber Ali, Masters
- 电话号码:+92-307-777-1403
- 邮箱:akber.ali@aku.edu
研究联系人备份
- 姓名:Dr. Jai Kumar Das, PhD
- 电话号码:0213486 69826
- 邮箱:jai.das@aku.edu
学习地点
-
-
Sindh
-
Badin、Sindh、巴基斯坦
- 招聘中
- Badin
-
接触:
- Dr. Jai Das, PhD
- 电话号码:0213486 69826
- 邮箱:jai.das@aku.edu
-
Karachi、Sindh、巴基斯坦
- 尚未招聘
- Aga Khan University
-
接触:
- Akber Ali, Masters
- 电话号码:+92-307-777-1403
- 邮箱:akber.ali@aku.edu
-
接触:
- Dr. Jai Kumar Das, PhD
- 电话号码:0213486 69826
- 邮箱:jai.das@aku.edu
-
首席研究员:
- Dr. Jai Das, PhD
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Permanent residents of the selected study area
- Aged 18 years and above
- Willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1-Temporary residents or non-residents of the study area
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:预防
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:社区干预 (CI)
集群通过乡村管理委员会(VMCs)接受一套结构化的社区主导适应与韧性干预包。\n活动包括减少灾害风险、生计多样化、金融素养和健康意识的培训及参与式会议。\n会议采用参与式学习方法进行,以增强家庭和社区的适应能力。
|
A structured package of community-led activities delivered through Village Management Committees, including participatory training on disaster risk reduction, livelihood diversification, financial literacy, and health awareness to strengthen household and community resilience.
|
|
实验性的:社区+初级保健干预(CHI)
各群体接受与第1组相同的社区干预措施,额外包括女性健康工作者和初级医疗保健提供者的参与。
卫生系统参与者支持提供与健康相关的组成部分,促进就医行为,并加强社区与卫生服务之间的联系,以增强韧性成果。
|
A structured package of community-led activities delivered through Village Management Committees, including participatory training on disaster risk reduction, livelihood diversification, financial literacy, and health awareness to strengthen household and community resilience.
Lady Health Workers and primary healthcare providers to reinforce interventions delivered through VMCs and strengthen linkages between communities and health services.
|
|
无干预:对照组
在试验期间,集群除了现有服务和标准条件外,不会得到任何额外干预。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Household disaster resilience
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Household disaster resilience will be assessed using the Disaster Resilience Index (DRI), a validated multidimensional composite measure of a household's ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from shocks.
The DRI comprises three domains: Coping Capacity, reflecting baseline resources and conditions that enable immediate response; Adaptive Capacity, capturing the ability to adjust and respond effectively through access to systems, resources, and support; and Transformative Capacity, measuring longer-term potential to learn, improve, and strengthen resilience over time.
The score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater household resilience.
|
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
|
Household vulnerability
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Household vulnerability will be assessed using the Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index (MLVI), a validated composite measure capturing susceptibility to shocks across three domains.
Adaptive Capacity reflects the ability to cope with and adjust to stressors, including access to resources, livelihood diversity, and social support.
Sensitivity captures the degree to which households are affected by shocks, based on their wellbeing, health, food and water security, and environmental conditions.
Exposure measures the extent to which households experience environmental and socio-economic shocks that threaten livelihoods.
The score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater household vulnerability.
|
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
"粮食安全"
大体时间:在基线和终末阶段(12个月)
|
食品安全将使用由粮食与营养技术援助项目(FANTA)制定的《家庭粮食不安全获取量表》(HFIAS)进行评估。
HFIAS是一种标准化工具,用于衡量过去四周内家庭对食物的获取情况,生成连续评分(范围:0-27分),分数越高表示粮食不安全程度越严重。
|
在基线和终末阶段(12个月)
|
|
Mental Health
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Mental health and psychological resilience will be accessed by Psychological Trauma index focused on post-traumatic stressful symptoms following climate related shocks. Mental health and psychological resilience will be assessed using the Psychological Trauma Index, a structured questionnaire measuring post-traumatic stress symptoms following climate related shocks. The index includes six items covering intrusive memories, emotional distress, avoidance, social withdrawal, irritability, and concentration difficulties. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 5 = Very Frequently). Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater severity of trauma symptoms). Lower scores reflect fewer symptoms and better psychological resilience. |
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
|
Household dietary diversity
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Dietary diversity will be measured using the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), following FAO guidelines. The HDDS is based on a 24 hour recall of foods consumed from 12 standard food groups (cereals, roots/tubers, vegetables, fruits, meat, eggs, fish, legumes/nuts, milk/dairy, oils/fats, sugar/honey, and miscellaneous). Scores on the Household Dietary Diversity Score range from 0 to 12, with higher values indicating better outcomes (greater dietary diversity and improved household food access). A score of 0 reflects no food group consumption in the recall period, while a score of 12 reflects consumption from all food groups. |
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Financial Literacy
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Financial literacy will be assessed through structured survey questions on access to financial services (e.g., household members with bank accounts), insurance coverage, savings and borrowing practices, bill payment regularity, expense planning, and ability to meet emergency needs.
Outcomes will be reported as individual indicators (counts and proportions)
|
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
|
Household Disaster Preparedness
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Household disaster preparedness will be assessed through structured survey questions covering awareness of disaster management, integration of preparedness knowledge into household plans, availability of emergency supplies, evacuation knowledge, prior preparedness actions, and exposure to community training or organizations involved in disaster response.
Outcomes will be reported as individual indicators (counts and proportions)
|
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
|
Health Knowledge and Practices
大体时间:At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
Health knowledge and practices will be assessed using a structured questionnaire evaluating knowledge and reported practices related to climate-sensitive health risks.
Responses will be summarized at the item level as counts and proportions.
No composite score or scale will be generated for this outcome; results will be presented as individual indicators.
|
At baseline and endline (12 month)
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.