이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Promoting Interventions for Climate Change to Upscale Resilience in District Badin (PICCTURE)

2026년 5월 6일 업데이트: Dr Jai Kumar Das

Promoting Interventions for Climate Change to Upscale Resilience (PICCTURE) Trial in District Badin

The PICCTURE trial is a cluster randomized controlled study which will be conducted in District Badin, Pakistan, to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based interventions in improving resilience to climate-related hazards. The study compares community-led adaptation and resilience strategies and community interventions integrated with primary healthcare engagement against a control group. The objective is to determine whether these approaches improve household-level resilience, adaptive capacity, and health-related outcomes in a coastal, climate-vulnerable population.

연구 개요

상세 설명

District Badin, located in the lower Indus delta of Pakistan, is highly exposed to recurrent climate-related hazards, including riverine and coastal flooding, cyclones, saline water intrusion, and increasing temperatures. These hazards interact with underlying structural vulnerabilities such as low-lying topography, reliance on agriculture and fisheries, and constrained access to health and social services-resulting in compounded risks to health, nutrition, and livelihoods. This context provides a suitable setting to evaluate integrated, community-based strategies aimed at strengthening resilience to climate-related shocks.

This study is guided by a multidimensional resilience framework that conceptualizes resilience as a function of coping, adaptive, and transformative capacities across social, economic, environmental, and health domains. The intervention package is informed by prior vulnerability assessments and designed to address key modifiable determinants of resilience, including disaster preparedness, livelihood security, financial risk management, and access to essential health services.

The intervention is delivered through two implementation models that differ in the degree of health system integration. The first model utilizes community-led platforms established through Village Management Committees (VMCs), which are locally constituted groups representing diverse segments of the community. These committees facilitate participatory learning and action processes, enabling communities to identify risks, prioritize solutions, and implement locally appropriate adaptation strategies. Core components include structured training on disaster risk reduction, development of community hazard maps and early warning mechanisms, promotion of climate-resilient livelihood options, and strengthening of household-level financial planning and emergency preparedness.

The second model builds on the community platform by incorporating structured engagement with Lady Health Workers (LHWs) and primary healthcare providers. This integrated approach is intended to strengthen linkages between communities and the formal health system, enhance delivery of climate-sensitive health messaging, improve identification and support of high-risk households, and facilitate continuity of care during climate-related events. Health system engagement also includes co-facilitation of selected community sessions, alignment of community preparedness plans with facility-level response mechanisms, and promotion of climate-responsive service delivery practices.

Intervention activities are implemented over a 12-month period using a standardized curriculum adapted to the local context. Delivery follows a phased approach, with more intensive engagement during the initial months followed by reinforcement sessions. Participatory group sessions, simulation exercises, and community mobilization activities are used to enhance knowledge, build skills, and support behavior change. Implementation fidelity is supported through structured training of facilitators, supervision, routine monitoring, and the use of standardized tools and materials.

Evaluation is conducted using repeated cross-sectional household surveys administered at baseline and endline to assess changes in resilience and vulnerability across multiple domains. Data collection includes measures of household preparedness, livelihood strategies, financial coping mechanisms, health-seeking behavior, and selected health and nutrition indicators. Process evaluation is embedded within the study to assess intervention delivery, including coverage, participation, adherence to planned activities, and functionality of community-level preparedness mechanisms such as emergency plans and early warning systems. These measures enable assessment of both implementation fidelity and intermediate pathways of impact.

To capture the effectiveness of interventions under real-world stress conditions, a rapid assessment component is incorporated. In the event of a major climate-related hazard affecting study areas during the implementation period, targeted data collection will be conducted shortly after the event to document community responses, functioning of preparedness systems, and access to essential services. This component is intended to complement routine evaluation by providing insight into intervention performance during actual shocks.

The analytical approach follows an intention-to-treat framework, whereby all households are analyzed according to their assigned study group regardless of level of participation. Intervention effects will be estimated using mixed-effects regression models to account for clustering at the community level and potential intra-cluster correlation. A difference-in-differences specification will be applied to compare changes over time between study groups, enabling estimation of intervention effects while controlling for baseline differences and secular trends. Models will incorporate fixed effects for time and study group, as well as interaction terms to estimate differential changes attributable to the intervention. Relevant household- and cluster-level covariates will be included to improve precision and adjust for residual confounding.

Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of findings to model specification and potential sources of bias, including differential attrition and variation in intervention exposure. Process indicators will be analyzed descriptively and, where appropriate, linked to outcome measures to explore potential mechanisms of effect.

This study is designed to generate rigorous evidence on the effectiveness of integrated community-based and health system-linked approaches to strengthening climate resilience in vulnerable populations. Findings are expected to inform the design and scale-up of adaptation strategies in similar climate-affected, resource-constrained settings.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

1800

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

  • 이름: Akber Ali, Masters
  • 전화번호: +92-307-777-1403
  • 이메일: akber.ali@aku.edu

연구 연락처 백업

  • 이름: Dr. Jai Kumar Das, PhD
  • 전화번호: 0213486 69826
  • 이메일: jai.das@aku.edu

연구 장소

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, 파키스탄
        • Aga Khan University
        • 연락하다:
        • 연락하다:
          • Dr. Jai Kumar Das, PhD
          • 전화번호: 0213486 69826
          • 이메일: jai.das@aku.edu
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Dr. Jai Das, PhD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Permanent residents of the selected study area
  2. Aged 18 years and above
  3. Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1-Temporary residents or non-residents of the study area

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: 지역사회 중재 (CI)
클러스터는 마을 관리 위원회(VMC)를 통해 제공되는 지역사회 주도 적응 및 복원력 개입의 구조화된 패키지를 받습니다. 활동에는 재난 위험 경감, 생계 다각화, 금융 이해력 및 건강 인식에 대한 교육 및 참여형 세션이 포함됩니다. 세션은 가구 및 지역사회의 적응 능력을 강화하기 위해 참여 학습 접근법을 사용하여 진행됩니다.
A structured package of community-led activities delivered through Village Management Committees, including participatory training on disaster risk reduction, livelihood diversification, financial literacy, and health awareness to strengthen household and community resilience.
실험적: 커뮤니티 + 1차 의료 중재 (CHI)
클러스터는 Arm 1과 동일한 지역사회 기반 중재를 받으며, 여성 보건 요원 및 일차 의료 제공자의 추가 참여가 이루어집니다. 의료 시스템 관계자는 건강 관련 요소의 전달을 지원하고, 치료 추구를 장려하며, 지역사회와 의료 서비스 간의 연결을 강화하여 회복탄력성 결과를 향상시킵니다.
A structured package of community-led activities delivered through Village Management Committees, including participatory training on disaster risk reduction, livelihood diversification, financial literacy, and health awareness to strengthen household and community resilience.
Lady Health Workers and primary healthcare providers to reinforce interventions delivered through VMCs and strengthen linkages between communities and health services.
간섭 없음: 대조군
클러스터는 연구 기간 동안 기존 서비스 및 표준 조건 외에 추가적인 중재를 받지 않습니다.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Household disaster resilience
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household disaster resilience will be assessed using the Disaster Resilience Index (DRI), a validated multidimensional composite measure of a household's ability to withstand, adapt to, and recover from shocks. The DRI comprises three domains: Coping Capacity, reflecting baseline resources and conditions that enable immediate response; Adaptive Capacity, capturing the ability to adjust and respond effectively through access to systems, resources, and support; and Transformative Capacity, measuring longer-term potential to learn, improve, and strengthen resilience over time. The score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater household resilience.
At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household vulnerability
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household vulnerability will be assessed using the Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index (MLVI), a validated composite measure capturing susceptibility to shocks across three domains. Adaptive Capacity reflects the ability to cope with and adjust to stressors, including access to resources, livelihood diversity, and social support. Sensitivity captures the degree to which households are affected by shocks, based on their wellbeing, health, food and water security, and environmental conditions. Exposure measures the extent to which households experience environmental and socio-economic shocks that threaten livelihoods. The score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater household vulnerability.
At baseline and endline (12 month)

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
식량 안보
기간: 기준 및 종료점에서(12개월)
식량 안보는 식품영양기술지원사업(FANTA)이 개발한 가구 식량 불안정 접근 척도(HFIAS)를 사용하여 평가됩니다. HFIAS는 지난 4주 동안 가구의 식량 접근성을 측정하는 표준화된 도구로, 연속 점수(범위: 0-27)를 생성하며, 점수가 높을수록 식량 불안정이 더 큰 것을 나타냅니다.
기준 및 종료점에서(12개월)
Mental Health
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)

Mental health and psychological resilience will be accessed by Psychological Trauma index focused on post-traumatic stressful symptoms following climate related shocks. Mental health and psychological resilience will be assessed using the Psychological Trauma Index, a structured questionnaire measuring post-traumatic stress symptoms following climate related shocks. The index includes six items covering intrusive memories, emotional distress, avoidance, social withdrawal, irritability, and concentration difficulties.

Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 5 = Very Frequently). Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater severity of trauma symptoms). Lower scores reflect fewer symptoms and better psychological resilience.

At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household dietary diversity
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)

Dietary diversity will be measured using the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), following FAO guidelines. The HDDS is based on a 24 hour recall of foods consumed from 12 standard food groups (cereals, roots/tubers, vegetables, fruits, meat, eggs, fish, legumes/nuts, milk/dairy, oils/fats, sugar/honey, and miscellaneous).

Scores on the Household Dietary Diversity Score range from 0 to 12, with higher values indicating better outcomes (greater dietary diversity and improved household food access). A score of 0 reflects no food group consumption in the recall period, while a score of 12 reflects consumption from all food groups.

At baseline and endline (12 month)

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Financial Literacy
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)
Financial literacy will be assessed through structured survey questions on access to financial services (e.g., household members with bank accounts), insurance coverage, savings and borrowing practices, bill payment regularity, expense planning, and ability to meet emergency needs. Outcomes will be reported as individual indicators (counts and proportions)
At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household Disaster Preparedness
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)
Household disaster preparedness will be assessed through structured survey questions covering awareness of disaster management, integration of preparedness knowledge into household plans, availability of emergency supplies, evacuation knowledge, prior preparedness actions, and exposure to community training or organizations involved in disaster response. Outcomes will be reported as individual indicators (counts and proportions)
At baseline and endline (12 month)
Health Knowledge and Practices
기간: At baseline and endline (12 month)
Health knowledge and practices will be assessed using a structured questionnaire evaluating knowledge and reported practices related to climate-sensitive health risks. Responses will be summarized at the item level as counts and proportions. No composite score or scale will be generated for this outcome; results will be presented as individual indicators.
At baseline and endline (12 month)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 4월 20일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2027년 4월 30일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2027년 5월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 4월 13일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 5월 3일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 7일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 5월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 5월 6일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 4월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2026-12334-39680

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

미정

IPD 계획 설명

We will do this on individual reasonable requests after seeking approval from the institute and the funders and would do so after a formal data transfer agreement.

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Community Interventions에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다