此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Development of a New Simplified Tool to Predict LNPCPs Histology and Assess the Risk of Submucosal Invasive Cancer. The Colorectal Regular-Irregular Score (CRIS)

2026年5月7日 更新者:University Hospital, Ghent

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer related death. It can be prevented by endoscopic detection and complete resection of colorectal polyps. The JNET (Japanese NBI Expert Team) classification is clinically useful to predict the histology of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) using narrow-band imaging at endoscopy. Japanese experts can reliably predict histology including the presence and depth of submucosal invasive cancer (SMI) using JNET with accuracy >87%. On the other hand, the International Evaluation of Endoscopy classification-JNET (IEE-JNET) group demonstrated that ESGE and JGES endoscopists had sufficient accuracy for JNET 1 (93.0%) but insufficient accuracy for JNET 2A/B and 3 (respectively 62.1%, 55.1% and 85.1%). Reliably distinguishing between JNET 2A, 2B and 3 has a profound clinical relevance, since JNET 2A lesions can safely be resected using pEMR whereas JNET 2B lesions should be resected en-bloc (EMR or ESD) due to the increased risk of cancer and JNET 3 lesions are preferably treated with surgery due to the high risk of deeply invasive carcinoma and the necessity of lymph node resection.

This study aims to validate a new simplified score, the Colorectal Regular-Irregular Score (CRIS) to fulfill the urgent need for a more effective and easier to use tool to predict LNPCPs histology. CRIS is a simplification of the JNET score which is mainly used by Japanese endoscopists or experts, recent evidence suggests its accuracy when used in everyday endoscopy in the Western world is insufficient. The investigators aim to compare JNET with CRIS for LNPCPs histology prediction amongst Western endoscopists using both original JNET interpretation and a clinically relevant approach.

The study consists of three work packages (WPs):

Work package one involves an expert online study where twelve expert endoscopists will evaluate 32 high-quality images of colorectal polyps using both JNET and CRIS classifications. Work package two involves an image/video-based online study where non-expert participants will be randomly assigned to rate images and videos using either JNET or CRIS, with performance re-evaluated after three months. Work package three involves a clinical study in a live endoscopy environment where non-expert endoscopists will participate in a randomized controlled trial assessing 10 colorectal polyps using either JNET or CRIS.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

764

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consenting Endoscopists of varying abilities and grades (endoscopist)
  • Endoscopists who did not previously encounter the score (endoscopist)
  • LNPCPs detected or referred for resection (patient)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Endoscopist does not consent to inclusion (endoscopist)
  • Video of inadequate quality as per opinion of the principal investigator
  • Endoscopist does not undergo learning intervention (endoscopist)
  • Patient does not consent to data collection for the study (patient)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:诊断
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:JNET Classification Training (Active Comparator)
Participants will follow a 5-minute learning video (intervention) on JNET and later for CRIS.
实验性的:CRIS Classification Training (Experimental)
Participants will follow a 5-minute learning video (intervention) on CRIS and later for JNET.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Diagnostic Accuracy of CRIS Classification for Submucosal Invasive Carcinoma (Sensitivity, Specificity, and Overall Accuracy)
大体时间:Immediately after 5-minute training and rating of 32 images (approximately 1 hour per participant)
Sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy of the CRIS classification for predicting submucosal invasive carcinoma compared with histopathological evaluation (reference standard). Accuracy is calculated as the proportion of correct classifications (true positives + true negatives) divided by total assessments. Results will be reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Immediately after 5-minute training and rating of 32 images (approximately 1 hour per participant)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Diagnostic Accuracy of CRIS Versus JNET Among Expert Endoscopists (Sensitivity, Specificity, Overall Accuracy)
大体时间:At completion of expert image rating (approximately 30 minutes per expert)
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy between CRIS and JNET classifications among 12 expert endoscopists rating 32 polyp images. Accuracy calculated as proportion of correct histopathology predictions. Results reported with 95% confidence intervals.
At completion of expert image rating (approximately 30 minutes per expert)
Diagnostic Accuracy of CRIS Versus JNET Across All Participant Categories (Sensitivity, Specificity, Overall Accuracy)
大体时间:Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy between CRIS and JNET classifications across all participant categories (experts, consultants, trainees, medical students, endoscopy nurses). Accuracy calculated as proportion of correct histopathology predictions using generalized linear mixed model analysis.
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Change in Diagnostic Accuracy From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-up for CRIS Versus JNET (Sensitivity, Specificity, Overall Accuracy)
大体时间:3 months after initial assessment
Change in sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy from immediate post-training assessment to 3-month delayed assessment for participants using CRIS versus JNET. Reported as absolute change in accuracy with 95% confidence intervals. A smaller decrease indicates better retention of classification skills.
3 months after initial assessment
Inter-observer Agreement for Polyp Classification Using CRIS Versus JNET (Fleiss' Kappa Coefficient)
大体时间:At completion of baseline image assessment (approximately 1 hour per participant)
Inter-observer agreement among non-expert endoscopists for polyp classification using CRIS versus JNET, measured using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. Values interpreted as: <0.20 poor, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 substantial, 0.81-1.00 almost perfect agreement.
At completion of baseline image assessment (approximately 1 hour per participant)
Correlation Between Proposed Endoscopic Treatment and CRIS/JNET Classification (Percentage Agreement)
大体时间:At completion of baseline image/video assessment (approximately 1 hour per participant)
Percentage of cases where the proposed endoscopic treatment (piecemeal EMR, en-bloc EMR/ESD, or surgical referral) aligns with the guideline-recommended treatment based on CRIS or JNET classification. Higher agreement indicates the classification effectively guides treatment selection.
At completion of baseline image/video assessment (approximately 1 hour per participant)
Change in CRIS/JNET Diagnostic Accuracy Following 5-Minute Structured Learning Intervention (Pre-Post Difference in Overall Accuracy)
大体时间:Immediately before and immediately after 5-minute learning video intervention (within a single 1-hour session)
Change in overall diagnostic accuracy from pre-intervention baseline to immediately post-intervention for CRIS and JNET classifications. Reported as absolute difference in accuracy percentage with 95% confidence intervals. The CRIS/JNET classification uses a scale where accuracy ranges from 0% (no correct classifications) to 100% (all classifications correct), with higher scores indicating better diagnostic performance.
Immediately before and immediately after 5-minute learning video intervention (within a single 1-hour session)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:David Tate、University Hospital, Ghent

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年7月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年12月31日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年12月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2025年8月14日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月7日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月13日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月7日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅