Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Interventions on Hand Performance With Stroke
Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Interventions on Hand Motor Function and Performance in Patients With Stroke
This randomized controlled trial investigated the comparative effects of sensory, motor, and combined sensorimotor interventions on hand motor function and behavioral performance in patients with stroke. The study focused on upper-extremity impairments, particularly deficits in hand strength, dexterity, and reaction time, which are common following stroke and substantially limit functional independence. Sensorimotor integration plays a critical role in motor recovery, as effective hand function depends on the interaction between sensory feedback and motor control mechanisms.
Participants with stroke were randomly assigned to sensory, motor, or combined sensorimotor intervention groups. The interventions were designed to target tactile perception, motor coordination, and integrated sensorimotor processing through attended active and passive stimulation approaches. Outcome measures included hand grip strength, manual dexterity, and reaction time, which were evaluated before and after the intervention period.
The findings demonstrated that sensorimotor-based rehabilitation approaches positively influenced upper-extremity motor performance and behavioral responses in stroke patients. In particular, combined sensorimotor interventions appeared to provide more comprehensive improvements by simultaneously enhancing sensory processing and motor execution. These results support the importance of integrating sensory-focused strategies into conventional motor rehabilitation programs to optimize neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke. The study contributes to the growing evidence supporting multidimensional rehabilitation approaches for improving hand function and sensorimotor performance in individuals with stroke.
研究概览
地位
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Istanbul
-
Kâğıthane、Istanbul、土耳其（türkiye）、34408
- Istanbul Atlas University
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having the ability to verbally communicate to answer questions
- Willingness to participate in the study
- Having read and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having joint movement restriction in the upper extremity
- Presence of skin injury or scarring on the hand or wrist
- History of surgery on the upper extremity
- Having an orthopedic problem in the upper extremity
- Having a rheumatic disease
- Having a neurological condition in the upper extremity
- Having a severe mental or cognitive impairment
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Sensory Exercise Group
|
The Sensory Exercise Group (SEG) participated in an intervention designed to enhance sensory awareness and integration.
The protocol included tactile stimuli such as sand, sensory balls, fabrics with different textures, multisensory gels, brushing, vibration, and superficial massage to stimulate cutaneous receptors and enrich sensory input.
Massage was applied with the participant in a supine position, elbows extended, and hands in a neutral position.
All sessions were standardized using a digital stopwatch, and each intervention lasted approximately 15 minutes with equal time allocation across groups.
This standardized timing ensured that observed effects were related to the intervention content rather than differences in exposure duration.
|
|
实验性的：Motor Exercise Group
|
The Motor Exercise Group (MEG) performed structured hand exercises including active range of motion exercises for the wrist and fingers, grip strengthening, stabilization exercises, and wrist flexion-extension exercises using elastic bands and dumbbells.
Resistance levels were adjusted according to participant tolerance, and the protocol was applied only to the dominant side.
Each exercise consisted of 5-7 repetitions and two sets, with 30-second rest intervals between sets.
|
|
实验性的：Combined Sensory and Motor Exercise Group
|
In the Combined Sensorimotor Group (CSMG), sensory and motor exercises were applied according to the protocols used in the Sensory Exercise Group (SEG) and Motor Exercise Group (MEG).
However, each exercise was performed as a single set, with the remaining session time allocated to superficial massage and sensory stimulation.
The sensory and motor components were administered sequentially, with each phase lasting approximately 7-8 minutes to maintain temporal balance within the session.
|
|
无干预：Control
The control group did not receive any additional treatments during the study period, allowing for a clear comparison between the experimental group and the baseline conditions.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Moberg Pick-up Test (MPUT)
大体时间：immediately after the intervention
|
Hand function was evaluated using the Moberg Pick-up Test (MPUT), a standardized method for assessing functional hand use and fine-motor skills, specifically measuring the ability to grasp and manipulate small objects.
During the test, participants were instructed to pick up various small objects (e.g., coins and small blocks) and place them in a container as quickly as possible.
During the test, the participants were instructed to pick up various small objects and place them in a container as quickly as possible.
The assessment was conducted with the dominant hand, first with eyes open and then with eyes closed, to test sensory function.
For each condition, the test was repeated three times, and the best performance time, recorded in seconds, was used for analysis.
The objects used in the test were of similar size and required coordinated hand movements for successful completion, ensuring consistency in task difficulty
|
immediately after the intervention
|
|
Muscle Reaction Time
大体时间：immediately after the intervention
|
Light Trainer® system, which consists of a wireless lighting system with LED pods and a central controller.
The participants were seated with their hands on the table, 40 cm apart, palms down, and elbows at 90°.
The Light Trainer was positioned centrally 20 cm away from each hand.
When the pod was illuminated, the participants were instructed to turn off the light as quickly as possible by touching it.
Light activation was randomized to avoid predictability, requiring participants to respond based on light cues each time.
In the first task, the participants used their dominant hand to turn off the light as quickly as possible.
In the second task, they responded to a light signal by deactivating a predetermined light from two different colors using their dominant hand.
Scale Range: No minimum or maximum value in milliseconds (lower time is better).
Interpretation: Lower reaction times signify better outcomes, as they reflect faster muscle response to visual stimuli.
|
immediately after the intervention
|
|
Grip Strength (Measured Using Jamar Electronic Dynamometer)
大体时间：immediately after the intervention
|
Hand performance was assessed based on grip strength using a Takei Handheld Dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Participants were seated with elbows flexed at 90 degrees and forearms in a neutral position, and were instructed to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum force for 3-5 seconds, with the palm facing upwards.
Each hand was tested three times with a 20-second rest between trials, and the highest value was recorded.
This protocol ensures standardized and consistent results, with measurements documented in kilograms (kg) to provide reliable grip strength assessment.
Scale Range: The dynamometer measures from 0 to 90 kg.
Interpretation: Higher scores reflect stronger grip strength, which is indicative of better hand function.
|
immediately after the intervention
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.