Feasibility and Preliminary Performance of an AI Prototype for Digital ROSE During EBUS-TBNA and Peripheral TBNA: a Prospective Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS) (AI-ROSE-FEAS)
Preliminary Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of an Investigational Artificial Intelligence Prototype for Digital Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytological Slides During Diagnostic Bronchoscopy With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Peripheral Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS)
Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytological slides obtained during EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic yield by providing real-time adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnostic orientation after each needle pass. In centers without a dedicated cytopathologist, ROSE is performed by a second interventional pulmonologist acting as a dedicated ROSE operator (interventional pulmonologist-performed ROSE, IP-ROSE), a model associated with good but variable diagnostic performance compared to cytopathologist-performed ROSE.
This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary diagnostic performance of an investigational artificial intelligence prototype for digital ROSE. The prototype, developed in-house by the Principal Investigator, analyzes microscopic images of Diff-Quik stained cytological slides acquired through a dedicated digital microscope, together with basic clinical data, via API calls to a multimodal AI model. It produces two outputs: sample adequacy (appropriate/not appropriate) and malignancy suspicion (benign/malignant), each with a confidence score. The AI output is recorded in the study database for research purposes only and is not shown to the operator in real time; it does not influence clinical decisions during the procedure.
The study is a prospective, monocentric, observational pilot study enrolling 65 adult patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA or peripheral TBNA with IP-ROSE at a single interventional pulmonology unit. The primary statistical unit is the individual ROSE slide, with an expected 130 to 160 evaluable slides. Co-primary endpoints are: (1) technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds; and (2) AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%. Secondary endpoints include AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion, agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator, and AI output latency.
The AI prototype is not a commercially approved or CE-marked medical device. It was developed internally by the Principal Investigator for research purposes and is evaluated exclusively within this study. Data from this pilot study will inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory non-inferiority trial, which will be the subject of separate registration and ethical approval.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Matilde Boccia, Medical Doctor
- 电话号码:+39 0817473393
- 邮箱:matilde.boccia@aocardarelli.it
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.
- The procedure will be performed in two-person mode with IP-ROSE performed as per the center's SOP.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Willingness to undergo the required follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
- Absolute contraindications to bronchoscopy.
- Known histological diagnosis of the target lesion (except re-staging).
- Concomitant interventional procedures that alter the standard sequence.
- Inability to provide written informed consent.
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, compromises patient safety or the reliability of the data.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected malignant disease of the lung or mediastinum or for suspected interstitial lung disease
|
Bronchologist's Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) compared with those of the AI and then compared with the pathological anatomy report
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
technical feasibility of the AI prototype
大体时间:6 months
|
technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds
|
6 months
|
|
AI accuracy
大体时间:6 months
|
AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%
|
6 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
大体时间:6 months
|
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
|
6 months
|
|
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
大体时间:6 months
|
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
|
6 months
|
|
AI output latency
大体时间:6 months
|
AI output latency
|
6 months
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.