Feasibility and Preliminary Performance of an AI Prototype for Digital ROSE During EBUS-TBNA and Peripheral TBNA: a Prospective Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS) (AI-ROSE-FEAS)

June 17, 2026 updated by: Matilde Boccia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale A.Cardarelli

Preliminary Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of an Investigational Artificial Intelligence Prototype for Digital Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of Cytological Slides During Diagnostic Bronchoscopy With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and Peripheral Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study (AI-ROSE-FEAS)

Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytological slides obtained during EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic yield by providing real-time adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnostic orientation after each needle pass. In centers without a dedicated cytopathologist, ROSE is performed by a second interventional pulmonologist acting as a dedicated ROSE operator (interventional pulmonologist-performed ROSE, IP-ROSE), a model associated with good but variable diagnostic performance compared to cytopathologist-performed ROSE.

This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary diagnostic performance of an investigational artificial intelligence prototype for digital ROSE. The prototype, developed in-house by the Principal Investigator, analyzes microscopic images of Diff-Quik stained cytological slides acquired through a dedicated digital microscope, together with basic clinical data, via API calls to a multimodal AI model. It produces two outputs: sample adequacy (appropriate/not appropriate) and malignancy suspicion (benign/malignant), each with a confidence score. The AI output is recorded in the study database for research purposes only and is not shown to the operator in real time; it does not influence clinical decisions during the procedure.

The study is a prospective, monocentric, observational pilot study enrolling 65 adult patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA or peripheral TBNA with IP-ROSE at a single interventional pulmonology unit. The primary statistical unit is the individual ROSE slide, with an expected 130 to 160 evaluable slides. Co-primary endpoints are: (1) technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds; and (2) AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%. Secondary endpoints include AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion, agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator, and AI output latency.

The AI prototype is not a commercially approved or CE-marked medical device. It was developed internally by the Principal Investigator for research purposes and is evaluated exclusively within this study. Data from this pilot study will inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory non-inferiority trial, which will be the subject of separate registration and ethical approval.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

65

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.
  • The procedure will be performed in two-person mode with IP-ROSE performed as per the center's SOP.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to undergo the required follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Absolute contraindications to bronchoscopy.
  • Known histological diagnosis of the target lesion (except re-staging).
  • Concomitant interventional procedures that alter the standard sequence.
  • Inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, compromises patient safety or the reliability of the data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected malignant disease of the lung or mediastinum or for suspected interstitial lung disease
Bronchologist's Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) compared with those of the AI and then compared with the pathological anatomy report
Other Names:
  • AI-ROSE
  • IP-ROSE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
technical feasibility of the AI prototype
Time Frame: 6 months
technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds
6 months
AI accuracy
Time Frame: 6 months
AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
Time Frame: 6 months
AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion
6 months
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
Time Frame: 6 months
Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator
6 months
AI output latency
Time Frame: 6 months
AI output latency
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on ROSE

Subscribe