此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Quantitative Assessment of the Efficacy of Alidya

2026年6月29日 更新者:Medical University of Silesia

Efficacy of Alidya Needle Mesotherapy in the Treatment of Cellulite: A Prospective Multimodal Clinical and Instrumental Evaluation

This study evaluated the efficacy of ALIDYA, a Class III medical device used in needle mesotherapy, for the treatment of cellulite (gynoid lipodystrophy) in women. Thirty female volunteers aged 20-45 years with cellulite graded 1 to 4 on the Nürnberger-Müller scale received a series of six mesotherapy treatments administered weekly to the posterior thighs. The study aimed to determine whether this treatment could improve the clinical appearance of cellulite and produce measurable changes in skin structure, microcirculation, and tissue composition. Assessments were performed before treatment, one month after the first application, and three months after the first application, using expert clinical grading as well as several objective instrumental methods: standardized clinical photography with texture analysis, thermal imaging, hyperspectral imaging, three-dimensional skin surface analysis (Antera 3D), and high-frequency ultrasound. The hypothesis was that ALIDYA would reduce the severity of cellulite by improving skin surface topography, microcirculation, and the structural quality of the skin.

研究概览

地位

完全的

干预/治疗

详细说明

ALIDYA is a Class III medical device manufactured by Marllor Biomedical (Italy), supplied as a 340 mg lyophilisate dissolved in 10 mL of solvent immediately before administration. The formulation is a polyamino acid gel containing gelatine hydrolysate, mannitol, calcium ascorbate, amino acids, EDTA, β-cyclodextrin, sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate, and is intended to target the microcirculatory, oedematous, oxidative and fibrotic components of cellulite.

The treatment protocol consisted of six mesotherapy sessions performed at weekly intervals. The preparation was administered using a point-by-point microinjection technique into the dermis or upper subcutaneous layer, to a depth of approximately 4 mm, with a spacing of approximately 1.5 cm between injection sites, delivering 0.05-0.1 mL per point. Total volume per session was adjusted to body weight: 10 mL per session (5 mL per thigh) for participants under 70 kg, and 20 mL per session (10 mL per thigh) for participants 70 kg or over. The treatment area covered the posterior surfaces of both thighs, from approximately 5 cm above the popliteal fossa to the gluteal line.

Assessments were performed at baseline (T1), one month after the first application (T2), and three months after the first application (T3). Clinical assessment used the Nürnberger-Müller scale (C Level). Instrumental assessments included: standardized clinical photography under cross-polarized light with Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture analysis and Quadtree Decomposition (QTDCOMP) spatial analysis; thermal imaging analyzed via GLCM contrast and homogeneity; hyperspectral imaging (400-1000 nm) with extraction of haemoglobin-, water- and heterogeneity-related spectral metrics; three-dimensional skin surface analysis (Antera 3D) for indentation volume, texture, and erythema; and high-frequency ultrasound (22 MHz) for skin thickness and acoustic density.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Mysłowice、波兰、41-400
        • AJ Med
      • Sosnowiec、波兰、41-200
        • Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female gender
  • Age between 20 and 45 years
  • Presence of clinically detectable cellulite, graded 1 to 4 on the Nürnberger-Müller scale
  • Significant aesthetic defect on the posterior surfaces of the thighs, confirmed by visual assessment in the standing position and palpation
  • Stable body weight in the period preceding the study
  • No contraindications to mesotherapy
  • Provision of informed consent to participate in the treatment procedures, photographic documentation, and instrumental assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent participation in other cellulite treatments, invasive or non-invasive
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Significant systemic diseases
  • Severe organ failure
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Treatment with immunosuppressants or systemic steroids
  • History of or active thromboembolic disease
  • Significant venous insufficiency
  • Presence of implanted devices or metal implants in the treatment area

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:ALIDYA mesotherapy
All 30 participants received a series of six needle mesotherapy treatments with ALIDYA, administered at weekly intervals to the posterior surfaces of both thighs. The preparation was injected intradermally or into the upper subcutaneous tissue at a depth of approximately 4 mm, using a point-by-point technique with 0.05-0.1 mL administered per injection site. Total volume per session was 10 mL (5 mL per thigh) for participants under 70 kg, or 20 mL (10 mL per thigh) for participants 70 kg or over. Assessments were performed at baseline (T1), one month after the first application (T2), and three months after the first application (T3).
ALIDYA is supplied as a 340 mg lyophilisate, dissolved in 10 mL of solvent immediately before administration to form an injectable solution. The formulation is a polyamino acid gel containing gelatine hydrolysate, mannitol, calcium ascorbate, amino acids, EDTA, β-cyclodextrin, sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate. It was administered via needle mesotherapy, in a series of six sessions at weekly intervals, with 0.05-0.1 mL injected per site, and a total session volume of 10 mL or 20 mL depending on body weight (<70 kg or ≥70 kg, respectively).

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change from Baseline in Cellulite Severity (C Level) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1) and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Cellulite severity was assessed by an expert using the Nürnberger-Müller scale, scored from 0 (no cellulite) to 4 (maximum changes), based on visual assessment in the standing position and palpation, taking into account skin unevenness, depressions, nodules, and the 'orange peel' sign.
Baseline (T1) and 3 months after the first application (T3)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change from Baseline in GLCM Contrast and Homogeneity of Skin Photographic Images at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin texture was assessed using Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) analysis of standardized clinical photographs taken under cross-polarized light. GLCM Contrast quantifies local brightness variation (higher values indicate more pronounced surface irregularities); GLCM Homogeneity quantifies overall image uniformity (higher values indicate smoother, more even skin). Both parameters were assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Quadtree Decomposition Fragmentation Indices of Skin Photographic Images at 3 Month
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin surface fragmentation was assessed using Quadtree Decomposition (QTDCOMP) analysis of standardized clinical photographs, which divides the image into homogeneous square blocks ranging from 2×2 to 128×128 pixels. A higher number of small squares (2×2 to 32×32 pixels) indicates greater structural fragmentation and irregularity, typical of more severe cellulite. A higher number of large squares (64×64 and 128×128 pixels) indicates smoother, more homogeneous skin areas. Square counts were assessed separately for the left and right thigh
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Thermal Imaging GLCM Contrast and Homogeneity at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin thermal texture was assessed using Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) analysis of infrared thermograms. GLCM Contrast quantifies local temperature variation (higher values indicate greater thermal heterogeneity, e.g. adjacent hypothermic and hyperthermic skin areas typical of cellulite). GLCM Homogeneity quantifies overall thermal map uniformity (higher values indicate more even temperature distribution). Both parameters were assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Hyperspectral Reflectance and Signal Heterogeneity Indices at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin optical properties were assessed using hyperspectral imaging (400-1000 nm) via dimensionless reflectance-based indices. Metrics included: mean reflectance in the haemoglobin-sensitive band (500-570 nm) and near-infrared range (700-900 nm); depth of the haemoglobin absorption dip at ~560 nm (HbDepth560); reflectance ratio indices R560/R650 and R577/R650; the water index (970/800 nm); and signal heterogeneity metrics (mean spread, standard deviation of spread, coefficient of variation of spread) describing spatial variability within the region of interest. All metrics are dimensionless ratios or proportions. An increase in reflectance and ratio indices, a decrease in haemoglobin dip depth, and a decrease in heterogeneity metrics were interpreted as indicating improved microcirculation and reduced optical heterogeneity of the skin.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Hyperspectral Spectral Slope at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin optical properties were assessed using hyperspectral imaging (400-1000 nm) via the slope of the reflectance curve, expressed in units of reflectance change per nanometer (1/nm). Spectral slope was measured in the visible range (500-600 nm) and near-infrared range (700-900 nm). An increase in slope was interpreted as a change in the overall shape of the reflectance spectrum, associated with reduced haemoglobin-related absorption (visible range) or altered scattering and tissue structure (near-infrared range).
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Indentation Volume (Antera 3D) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin surface depressions were assessed using the Antera 3D imaging system, which measures the volume of skin indentations (Volume, in mm³) within the region of interest. A higher Volume value indicates greater depth and extent of skin depressions, corresponding to more pronounced cellulite. A decrease in Volume was interpreted as a favorable reduction in skin depression depth and surface smoothing. Volume was assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Texture Score and Roughness (Antera 3D) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin surface texture was assessed using the Antera 3D imaging system, which measures two dimensionless parameters: Texture Score (a composite measure of textural abnormality severity) and Roughness (degree of surface irregularity). Higher values for both parameters indicate greater skin unevenness; a decrease following treatment was interpreted as surface smoothing and reduced severity of skin micro-relief. Both parameters were assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Texture Maximum Height (Antera 3D) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin surface texture was assessed using the Antera 3D imaging system, which measures Texture Maximum Height (in mm), the greatest height difference within the region of interest. A higher value indicates greater skin unevenness; a decrease following treatment was interpreted as surface smoothing and reduced severity of skin micro-relief. This parameter was assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Erythema Parameters (Antera 3D) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin erythema was assessed using the Antera 3D imaging system, which measures four parameters: Redness Score (overall erythema intensity), Minimum and Maximum (lower and upper range of erythema signal intensity), and Uniformity (uniformity of erythema distribution within the region of interest). A decrease in Redness Score, Minimum, and Maximum was interpreted as a reduction in the vascular-erythemal component of cellulite. All parameters were assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Thickness (Ultrasound) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin structure was assessed using high-frequency (22 MHz) ultrasound, which measures Skin Thickness (in mm), the distance from the entry echo to the dermal-subcutaneous boundary. An increase in Skin Thickness was interpreted as a favorable sign of dermal remodeling and increased collagen matrix organization. This parameter was assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Change from Baseline in Skin Acoustic Density (Ultrasound) at 3 Months
大体时间:Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)
Skin structure was assessed using high-frequency (22 MHz) ultrasound, which measures Acoustic Density/Echogenicity (in IU), reflecting the degree of ultrasound wave reflection by tissue matrix structures. An increase in Acoustic Density was interpreted as a favorable sign of increased collagen matrix organization and reduced interstitial oedema. This parameter was assessed separately for the left and right thigh.
Baseline (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months after the first application (T3)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

合作者

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Sławomir Wilczyński, Profesor、Department of Basic Biomedical Science, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical Universi-ty of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年3月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年4月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年4月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月29日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月30日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月30日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月29日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅