此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

A Kinder Coaching Program With Community Health Workers "READY" (READY)

2026年6月24日 更新者：Jaime Peterson、Oregon Health and Science University

Promoting School Readiness in Primary Care: A Kinder Coaching Program With Community Health Workers

In this study, the investigators compare two novel primary care interventions (School Readiness Checklist vs. Kinder Coaching) for low-income parents, which were co-developed by parent, clinical, and educational stakeholders. This R01 builds evidence on a low touch (low intensity, lower cost intervention) School Readiness Checklist compared to high touch (higher intensity, embedded program) Kinder Coaching with Community Health Workers in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation RCT.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Children who enter school ready to learn are more likely to succeed academically. Yet, children from low income households often enter school behind their high income peers. The primary care clinic has an opportunity to promote school readiness (SR), as pediatricians have trusted, repeated relationships with children and families. In prior work, families of recent kindergarteners identified specific SR interventions for pediatric clinics to increase parent SR knowledge through Checklists and parent empowerment through Coaching with community health workers.

The research objective of this R01 is to assess the effectiveness of a high touch, Kinder Coaching Program, compared to enhanced usual well child care (eUC) [an SR Checklist reviewed by provider] on child SR in primary care clinics serving Medicaid families with preschoolers. The premise is that pediatric clinics are trusted, acceptable, and feasible settings to identify and address SR needs of families. The investigators will conduct a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial on Kinder Coaching with parents of 3-4 year olds in 2 safety-net primary care clinics serving families on Medicaid in Oregon (n=240; 120/arm) powered with pilot data to assess primary efficacy outcomes: child school readiness (Brigance III) and child social emotional development (DECA). Secondary parent outcomes (school readiness behaviors, confidence, resources, barriers) and implementation outcomes (e.g., delivery, fidelity, cost-benefit analysis) using the RE-AIM implementation framework.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

480

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名：Jaime Peterson, MD, MPH
  • 电话号码：503-418-5700
  • 邮箱：peterjai@ohsu.edu

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or caregiver is 18 years of age or older with no intellectual disability and can speak and understand Spanish and/or English. Participants unable to read will be eligible as data will be verbally collected by bilingual research staff.
  • Child is between 3 and 4 years of age at enrollment and receives primary care at a study site.
  • Child is from a low-income household on Medicaid insurance.
  • Child has no significant developmental disability or serious medical condition that limits communication with the Kinder Coach. Children with mild developmental delays including speech delay, gross motor delay, autism spectrum disorder, mild cerebral palsy, and ADHD will be included to capture a heterogenous, real-world sample from primary care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or child with significant intellectual disability.
  • Teen parents under the age of 18.
  • Child is in foster care or other situation in which consent cannot be obtained from a legal guardian.
  • Child with a significant developmental disability that limits participation including cerebral palsy, non-verbal autism spectrum disorder, Down's syndrome, global developmental delay, or other serious medical condition impacting ability to participate in a Kinder Coaching visit. Developmental conditions will be defined as children who screen negative on the Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN) screener for developmental and/or behavioral special needs "above and beyond what would be expected" for a child of that age.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：预防
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
无干预：Enhanced Usual Care - School Readiness Checklist
Provider reviews a school readiness checklist with tips in the well child check
实验性的：Intervention - Kinder Coaching
The Kinder Ready Coaching Intervention provides two structured, individualized parent-child school readiness coaching sessions with a bilingual community health worker (CHW) to: 1) share knowledge of kindergarten skills, 2) assess child school readiness, 3) set goals and model activities for home practice, 4) connect families to critical school readiness resources including preschool and behavioral health, and 5) provide educational tools for home such as culturally concordant books, games, and/or puzzles.
行为的：Kinder Coaching
The Kinder Ready Coaching Intervention provides two structured, individualized parent-child school readiness coaching sessions with a bilingual community health worker (CHW) to: 1) share knowledge of kindergarten skills, 2) assess child school readiness, 3) set goals and model activities for home practice, 4) connect families to critical school readiness resources including preschool and behavioral health, and 5) provide educational tools for home such as culturally concordant books, games, and/or puzzles.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Child composite school readiness skills
大体时间：Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
Brigance III Screen (Brigance); total composite score: min 0, max 0. Interpretation: Very weak (< 70), Weak (70-79), Below average (80-89), Average (90-110), Above average (111-120), Strong (121-130), Very strong (>130)
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
Child social emotional development
大体时间：Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA). Attachment relationship T score: Min 28- Max 72 Initiative T score: Min 28- Max 72 Self-regulation T score: Min 28- Max 72 Behavioral concerns T score: Min 28- Max 72

Total Protective Factors sum:

Description total protective factors: Strengths, Typical, Area of Need Description behavioral concerns: Strengths, Typical, Area of Need
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Percentage of children enrolled in preschool by intervention status
大体时间：Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
Child preschool enrollment will be determined by parent report at two time points. Parents will be asked "is your child enrolled in preschool", yes or no.
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Oregon Health and Science University

合作者

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Jaime Peterson, MD, MPH、Oregon Health and Science University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2027年7月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2030年7月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2031年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月24日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月24日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • STUDY00030113

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

Deidentified data will be stored within NICHD DASH repository. Investigators can request access through DASH policies and procedures.

IPD 共享时间框架

De-identified quantitative and qualitative data will be made available at the time of publication of primary study findings or at the end of the funding period, whichever comes first.

IPD 共享访问标准

Researchers interested in accessing de-identified quantitative and qualitative data must request the data from DASH using their policies and procedures.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅