此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

STSC-HybridAPC Trial

2026年6月26日 更新者:Professor Michael Bourke、Western Sydney Local Health District

Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Versus Hybrid APC (ERBE) for Post-EMR Margin Thermal Ablation - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Margin thermal ablation after piecemeal EMR significantly reduces recurrence of large colorectal polyps. As recurrence rates are now low, the key implementation question relates to efficiency and reproducibility of different ablation techniques. This randomized controlled trial compares snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) with Hybrid APC (ERBE), with procedural time as the primary endpoint.

研究概览

详细说明

Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal lesions was historically associated with local recurrence rates in the range of 15-20% at first surveillance when no systematic margin therapy was applied¹. The introduction of structured post-EMR margin thermal ablation has substantially altered this landscape. In a landmark randomized controlled trial, systematic thermal ablation of the resection margin reduced recurrence from 21% to 5%². Subsequent prospective and multicenter studies performed in high-volume expert centers using standardized circumferential snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) protocols have demonstrated further reductions, with reported recurrence rates approaching 1-2%³. Most recently, Gauci et al. demonstrated that complete margin thermal ablation eliminates lesion size as a risk factor for recurrence following piecemeal EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, reinforcing the durability and consistency of this approach in contemporary practice⁴. These findings are supported by meta-analytic data confirming that thermal margin ablation significantly reduces recurrence compared with no ablation without increasing clinically meaningful adverse events⁵. Accordingly, current international guidelines strongly recommend routine thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin following piecemeal resection of large colorectal lesions⁶.

Given that recurrence rates are now low when complete circumferential ablation is systematically performed, additional trials powered for recurrence would require prohibitively large sample sizes to detect incremental differences. The remaining clinically relevant gap therefore relates not to efficacy, but to procedural efficiency, reproducibility, and implementation, particularly in early-career or non-advanced interventional endoscopists.

Snare-tip soft coagulation requires precise contact-based application of thermal energy at each point sequentially along the entire resection margin, demanding consistent tip positioning and repeated fine manipulations. This technical precision may be particularly challenging for endoscopists with limited experience, increasing the risk of incomplete ablation or prolonged procedural time.

Hybrid APC (ERBE) delivers thermal energy via a non-contact argon plasma beam with a broader coagulation footprint per activation, potentially enabling faster and more reproducible circumferential coverage with fewer individual applications. The wider energy spread of Hybrid APC may therefore reduce operator-dependent variability and facilitate more consistent margin treatment, particularly in the hands of early-career endoscopists. Whether this translates into a meaningful reduction in net ablation time and improved completion rates compared with STSC has not been prospectively evaluated.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

140

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Undergoing piecemeal EMR of a non-pedunculated colorectal lesion ≥20 mm in size
  • Macroscopically complete resection achieved prior to margin ablation (no visible residual adenomatous tissue at the resection base)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions requiring en bloc resection by ESD
  • Lesions with suspected deep submucosal invasion based on endoscopic assessment (e.g., depressed morphology, non-lifting sign, NICE type 3 pattern, or equivalent advanced imaging criteria)
  • Inflammatory bowel disease with active colitis at the lesion site
  • Overt invasive carcinoma requiring surgical management
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
有源比较器:Hybrid APC (ERBE)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Net margin ablation time
大体时间:during the procedure
Net margin ablation time (seconds), defined as the elapsed time from the first application of thermal energy to the resection margin (first activation in soft coagulation mode) until the operator declares completion of circumferential margin ablation. Time will be recorded using a standardized stopwatch method by a trained assistant/nurse (or captured from time-stamped video, if available). Interruptions unrelated to margin ablation (e.g., equipment troubleshooting) will be documented and excluded from net time where feasible, with sensitivity analyses planned.
during the procedure

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Time (total)
大体时间:during procedure
Total procedure time (minutes): from first endoscopic view of the lesion to scope withdrawal.
during procedure
Technical success of margin ablation
大体时间:during procedure
Technical success of margin ablation: completion of circumferential thermal treatment of the entire visible mucosal defect margin as judged by the supervising endoscopist and recorded as yes/no.
during procedure
Instrument exchanges (count)
大体时间:during procedure
Instrument exchanges (count): number of device exchanges required after completion of EMR to achieve margin ablation.
during procedure
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no)
大体时间:during procedure
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no): including clips, APC outside assigned intervention, injectable agents, or other modalities used for bleeding control.
during procedure
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10)
大体时间:during procedure
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10): recorded immediately post-procedure (0 = very difficult, 10 = very easy)
during procedure
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10)
大体时间:during procedure
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10): confidence that ablation was complete (0 = not confident, 10 = fully confident).
during procedure
Immediate adverse events
大体时间:during procedure
Immediate adverse events: intraprocedural and early post-procedural events as per standard definitions (bleeding requiring endoscopic therapy, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome, unplanned admission). Severity will be graded using an accepted endoscopy AE severity framework (e.g., ASGE lexicon).
during procedure
Cost impact (exploratory)
大体时间:during procedure
Cost impact (exploratory): incremental procedural cost derived from device utilization (snare tip vs Hybrid APC), number of exchanges, and additional haemostatic devices used.
during procedure
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only)
大体时间:during procedure
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only): proportion of Arm A cases in which the supervising endoscopist judged circumferential margin ablation to be incomplete at the conclusion of the trainee's attempt, necessitating supplementary ablation by the supervisor.
during procedure

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Michael J Bourke, MBBS、WSLHD

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2027年1月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年8月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年8月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月26日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月26日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月26日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2026/PID01713

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅