Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

STSC-HybridAPC Trial

26 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Professor Michael Bourke, Western Sydney Local Health District

Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Versus Hybrid APC (ERBE) for Post-EMR Margin Thermal Ablation - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Margin thermal ablation after piecemeal EMR significantly reduces recurrence of large colorectal polyps. As recurrence rates are now low, the key implementation question relates to efficiency and reproducibility of different ablation techniques. This randomized controlled trial compares snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) with Hybrid APC (ERBE), with procedural time as the primary endpoint.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal lesions was historically associated with local recurrence rates in the range of 15-20% at first surveillance when no systematic margin therapy was applied¹. The introduction of structured post-EMR margin thermal ablation has substantially altered this landscape. In a landmark randomized controlled trial, systematic thermal ablation of the resection margin reduced recurrence from 21% to 5%². Subsequent prospective and multicenter studies performed in high-volume expert centers using standardized circumferential snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) protocols have demonstrated further reductions, with reported recurrence rates approaching 1-2%³. Most recently, Gauci et al. demonstrated that complete margin thermal ablation eliminates lesion size as a risk factor for recurrence following piecemeal EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, reinforcing the durability and consistency of this approach in contemporary practice⁴. These findings are supported by meta-analytic data confirming that thermal margin ablation significantly reduces recurrence compared with no ablation without increasing clinically meaningful adverse events⁵. Accordingly, current international guidelines strongly recommend routine thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin following piecemeal resection of large colorectal lesions⁶.

Given that recurrence rates are now low when complete circumferential ablation is systematically performed, additional trials powered for recurrence would require prohibitively large sample sizes to detect incremental differences. The remaining clinically relevant gap therefore relates not to efficacy, but to procedural efficiency, reproducibility, and implementation, particularly in early-career or non-advanced interventional endoscopists.

Snare-tip soft coagulation requires precise contact-based application of thermal energy at each point sequentially along the entire resection margin, demanding consistent tip positioning and repeated fine manipulations. This technical precision may be particularly challenging for endoscopists with limited experience, increasing the risk of incomplete ablation or prolonged procedural time.

Hybrid APC (ERBE) delivers thermal energy via a non-contact argon plasma beam with a broader coagulation footprint per activation, potentially enabling faster and more reproducible circumferential coverage with fewer individual applications. The wider energy spread of Hybrid APC may therefore reduce operator-dependent variability and facilitate more consistent margin treatment, particularly in the hands of early-career endoscopists. Whether this translates into a meaningful reduction in net ablation time and improved completion rates compared with STSC has not been prospectively evaluated.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

140

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Undergoing piecemeal EMR of a non-pedunculated colorectal lesion ≥20 mm in size
  • Macroscopically complete resection achieved prior to margin ablation (no visible residual adenomatous tissue at the resection base)
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions requiring en bloc resection by ESD
  • Lesions with suspected deep submucosal invasion based on endoscopic assessment (e.g., depressed morphology, non-lifting sign, NICE type 3 pattern, or equivalent advanced imaging criteria)
  • Inflammatory bowel disease with active colitis at the lesion site
  • Overt invasive carcinoma requiring surgical management
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Comparateur actif: Hybrid APC (ERBE)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Net margin ablation time
Délai: during the procedure
Net margin ablation time (seconds), defined as the elapsed time from the first application of thermal energy to the resection margin (first activation in soft coagulation mode) until the operator declares completion of circumferential margin ablation. Time will be recorded using a standardized stopwatch method by a trained assistant/nurse (or captured from time-stamped video, if available). Interruptions unrelated to margin ablation (e.g., equipment troubleshooting) will be documented and excluded from net time where feasible, with sensitivity analyses planned.
during the procedure

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Time (total)
Délai: during procedure
Total procedure time (minutes): from first endoscopic view of the lesion to scope withdrawal.
during procedure
Technical success of margin ablation
Délai: during procedure
Technical success of margin ablation: completion of circumferential thermal treatment of the entire visible mucosal defect margin as judged by the supervising endoscopist and recorded as yes/no.
during procedure
Instrument exchanges (count)
Délai: during procedure
Instrument exchanges (count): number of device exchanges required after completion of EMR to achieve margin ablation.
during procedure
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no)
Délai: during procedure
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no): including clips, APC outside assigned intervention, injectable agents, or other modalities used for bleeding control.
during procedure
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10)
Délai: during procedure
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10): recorded immediately post-procedure (0 = very difficult, 10 = very easy)
during procedure
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10)
Délai: during procedure
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10): confidence that ablation was complete (0 = not confident, 10 = fully confident).
during procedure
Immediate adverse events
Délai: during procedure
Immediate adverse events: intraprocedural and early post-procedural events as per standard definitions (bleeding requiring endoscopic therapy, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome, unplanned admission). Severity will be graded using an accepted endoscopy AE severity framework (e.g., ASGE lexicon).
during procedure
Cost impact (exploratory)
Délai: during procedure
Cost impact (exploratory): incremental procedural cost derived from device utilization (snare tip vs Hybrid APC), number of exchanges, and additional haemostatic devices used.
during procedure
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only)
Délai: during procedure
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only): proportion of Arm A cases in which the supervising endoscopist judged circumferential margin ablation to be incomplete at the conclusion of the trainee's attempt, necessitating supplementary ablation by the supervisor.
during procedure

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Michael J Bourke, MBBS, WSLHD

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 janvier 2027

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 août 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

15 août 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

6 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

6 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2026/PID01713

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Adénomes du côlon

3
S'abonner