- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07682805
STSC-HybridAPC Trial
Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Versus Hybrid APC (ERBE) for Post-EMR Margin Thermal Ablation - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colorectal lesions was historically associated with local recurrence rates in the range of 15-20% at first surveillance when no systematic margin therapy was applied¹. The introduction of structured post-EMR margin thermal ablation has substantially altered this landscape. In a landmark randomized controlled trial, systematic thermal ablation of the resection margin reduced recurrence from 21% to 5%². Subsequent prospective and multicenter studies performed in high-volume expert centers using standardized circumferential snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) protocols have demonstrated further reductions, with reported recurrence rates approaching 1-2%³. Most recently, Gauci et al. demonstrated that complete margin thermal ablation eliminates lesion size as a risk factor for recurrence following piecemeal EMR of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, reinforcing the durability and consistency of this approach in contemporary practice⁴. These findings are supported by meta-analytic data confirming that thermal margin ablation significantly reduces recurrence compared with no ablation without increasing clinically meaningful adverse events⁵. Accordingly, current international guidelines strongly recommend routine thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin following piecemeal resection of large colorectal lesions⁶.
Given that recurrence rates are now low when complete circumferential ablation is systematically performed, additional trials powered for recurrence would require prohibitively large sample sizes to detect incremental differences. The remaining clinically relevant gap therefore relates not to efficacy, but to procedural efficiency, reproducibility, and implementation, particularly in early-career or non-advanced interventional endoscopists.
Snare-tip soft coagulation requires precise contact-based application of thermal energy at each point sequentially along the entire resection margin, demanding consistent tip positioning and repeated fine manipulations. This technical precision may be particularly challenging for endoscopists with limited experience, increasing the risk of incomplete ablation or prolonged procedural time.
Hybrid APC (ERBE) delivers thermal energy via a non-contact argon plasma beam with a broader coagulation footprint per activation, potentially enabling faster and more reproducible circumferential coverage with fewer individual applications. The wider energy spread of Hybrid APC may therefore reduce operator-dependent variability and facilitate more consistent margin treatment, particularly in the hands of early-career endoscopists. Whether this translates into a meaningful reduction in net ablation time and improved completion rates compared with STSC has not been prospectively evaluated.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Kathleen Goodrick, BN
- Numéro de téléphone: +612 88905555
- E-mail: kathleen.goodrick@health.nsw.gov.au
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Mayan Eitan, MD
- Numéro de téléphone: +612 88905555
- E-mail: mayan.eitan@health.nsw.gov.au
Lieux d'étude
-
-
New South Wales
-
Sydney, New South Wales, Australie, 2145
- Westmead Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kathleen Goodrick, BN
- Numéro de téléphone: +612 88905555
- E-mail: kathleen.goodrick@health.nsw.gov.au
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Undergoing piecemeal EMR of a non-pedunculated colorectal lesion ≥20 mm in size
- Macroscopically complete resection achieved prior to margin ablation (no visible residual adenomatous tissue at the resection base)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lesions requiring en bloc resection by ESD
- Lesions with suspected deep submucosal invasion based on endoscopic assessment (e.g., depressed morphology, non-lifting sign, NICE type 3 pattern, or equivalent advanced imaging criteria)
- Inflammatory bowel disease with active colitis at the lesion site
- Overt invasive carcinoma requiring surgical management
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide informed consent
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode.
The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
|
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode.
The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Hybrid APC (ERBE)
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode.
The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
|
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode.
The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Net margin ablation time
Délai: during the procedure
|
Net margin ablation time (seconds), defined as the elapsed time from the first application of thermal energy to the resection margin (first activation in soft coagulation mode) until the operator declares completion of circumferential margin ablation.
Time will be recorded using a standardized stopwatch method by a trained assistant/nurse (or captured from time-stamped video, if available).
Interruptions unrelated to margin ablation (e.g., equipment troubleshooting) will be documented and excluded from net time where feasible, with sensitivity analyses planned.
|
during the procedure
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Time (total)
Délai: during procedure
|
Total procedure time (minutes): from first endoscopic view of the lesion to scope withdrawal.
|
during procedure
|
|
Technical success of margin ablation
Délai: during procedure
|
Technical success of margin ablation: completion of circumferential thermal treatment of the entire visible mucosal defect margin as judged by the supervising endoscopist and recorded as yes/no.
|
during procedure
|
|
Instrument exchanges (count)
Délai: during procedure
|
Instrument exchanges (count): number of device exchanges required after completion of EMR to achieve margin ablation.
|
during procedure
|
|
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no)
Délai: during procedure
|
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no): including clips, APC outside assigned intervention, injectable agents, or other modalities used for bleeding control.
|
during procedure
|
|
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10)
Délai: during procedure
|
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10): recorded immediately post-procedure (0 = very difficult, 10 = very easy)
|
during procedure
|
|
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10)
Délai: during procedure
|
Operator confidence (VAS 0-10): confidence that ablation was complete (0 = not confident, 10 = fully confident).
|
during procedure
|
|
Immediate adverse events
Délai: during procedure
|
Immediate adverse events: intraprocedural and early post-procedural events as per standard definitions (bleeding requiring endoscopic therapy, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome, unplanned admission).
Severity will be graded using an accepted endoscopy AE severity framework (e.g., ASGE lexicon).
|
during procedure
|
|
Cost impact (exploratory)
Délai: during procedure
|
Cost impact (exploratory): incremental procedural cost derived from device utilization (snare tip vs Hybrid APC), number of exchanges, and additional haemostatic devices used.
|
during procedure
|
|
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only)
Délai: during procedure
|
Rate of incomplete STSC margin ablation by trainee operators (yes/no, Arm A only): proportion of Arm A cases in which the supervising endoscopist judged circumferential margin ablation to be incomplete at the conclusion of the trainee's attempt, necessitating supplementary ablation by the supervisor.
|
during procedure
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Michael J Bourke, MBBS, WSLHD
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):388-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
- Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libanio D, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellise M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albeniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
- Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2026/PID01713
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .
Essais cliniques sur Adénomes du côlon
-
Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung...Ovesco Endoscopy AG; Tuebingen Scientific Medical GmbHRecrutementAdénome Côlon | Adénome Colon PolypeAllemagne
-
Virtual Incision CorporationInscription sur invitation
-
Yale UniversityComplété
-
Military University Hospital, PragueUniversity Hospital Olomouc; Masaryk UniversityRecrutementPolypes | Cancer du colonTchéquie
-
Hiroki YamaueKatsunari TakifujiInconnue
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)ComplétéCancer rectal | Cancer du colon | État précancéreuxÉtats-Unis
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)ComplétéCancer rectal | Cancer du colon | État précancéreuxÉtats-Unis
-
Istanbul UniversityInconnueCANCER DU COLONTurquie
-
Chonnam National University HospitalComplétéCancer du colonCorée, République de
-
Rambam Health Care CampusInconnue