Health Informatics Education Effectiveness in Nepal (HI-EDU)
2026年7月7日 更新者：Dip Bahadur Singh、Axon Infotech Research Academy Pvt. Ltd.
Assessing the Comparative Effectiveness of Health Informatics Education: Knowledge Retention and Technological Awareness in Health Science Students
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a blended Health Informatics (HI) course (HI471) on knowledge retention and technology awareness among health science students in Nepal.
Bachelor of Public Health (BPH) students (intervention group, n=17) received a 14-week HI471 course combining online, virtual, and in-person practical sessions.
A control group of Bachelor of Pharmacy (B.Pharm) students (n=17) continued their standard curriculum without dedicated HI instruction.
Both groups completed a validated 44-item knowledge assessment and an 11-item technology awareness survey at baseline (Week 1) and post-intervention (Week 15).
The primary outcome was the between-group difference in knowledge gain scores.
Results showed that BPH students significantly improved their total knowledge scores (median +31.5 points, r=0.879), while the B.Pharm control group showed no significant change.
BPH students achieved 100% awareness of 9 out of 11 digital health tools at post-test.
This study provides strong evidence that the HI471 blended course is highly effective in building informatics competencies in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) academic setting.
The study was retrospectively registered.
研究概览
详细说明
This controlled pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group evaluated the effectiveness of the Health Informatics-471 (HI471) blended course at Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences (MBAHS) in Nepal.
The intervention group (G1) consisted of all 17 Bachelor of Public Health (BPH) students enrolled in the 7th semester, who received the HI471 course.
The control group (G2) consisted of 17 Bachelor of Pharmacy (B.Pharm) 7th-semester students, randomly sampled from 29 eligible students, who received no dedicated HI instruction.
The HI471 course integrated three blended modalities over 14 weeks: (i) online asynchronous LMS instruction (pre-recorded lectures, readings, quizzes), (ii) live synchronous Google Meet sessions, and (iii) in-person practical laboratory sessions covering EHR platforms, DHIS2, SPSS/R, and telemedicine interfaces.
A validated 44-item Health Informatics Knowledge Assessment Tool (with weighted partial-credit scoring, maximum 100 points) and an 11-item binary technology awareness instrument were administered at T1 (Week 1, baseline) and T2 (Week 15, post-intervention).
The primary outcome was the between-group difference in total knowledge gain scores (Δ = T2 - T1), analyzed using non-parametric statistics (Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Friedman, McNemar) with bootstrap effect sizes.
The study demonstrated large, significant knowledge gains in the intervention group (median +31.5 points, r=0.824, p<0.001) compared to the control group, with robust findings across three pre-specified sensitivity analyses.
The intervention group achieved near-complete technology awareness (100% on 9 out of 11 tools).
This research addresses the evidence gap for controlled educational evaluations in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) academic settings.
The study protocol was approved by the MBAHS Institutional Review Committee (IRC-134-082-083), and all participants provided written informed consent.
The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki (revised 2013).
The study was registered retrospectively.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
34
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Bagmati
-
Hetauda、Bagmati、尼泊尔、31206
- Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Active enrollment in the 7th semester of the Bachelor of Public Health (BPH) program (intervention group) or the Bachelor of Pharmacy (B.Pharm) program (control group) at Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences (MBAHS).
- Voluntary written informed consent obtained prior to any study procedure.
- Completion of both T1 (Week 1, baseline) and T2 (Week 15, post-intervention) assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Withdrawal from the study before completion of all study procedures.
- Incomplete paired data (missing T1 or T2 assessment).
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：非随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：BPH Intervention Group
Bachelor of Public Health (BPH) 7th-semester students (n=17) who received the 14-week Health Informatics-471 (HI471) blended course, consisting of online asynchronous LMS instruction, live synchronous Google Meet sessions, and in-person practical laboratory work covering seven HI content domains.
|
A 14-week blended educational course combining: (i) online asynchronous LMS instruction (pre-recorded lectures, readings, quizzes); (ii) live synchronous Google Meet sessions (2 hours, 3 days per week); and (iii) in-person practical laboratory sessions (4 hours per week) covering Electronic Health Records (EHR), DHIS2, SPSS/R, and telemedicine interfaces.
No drug, device, biological product, or surgical procedure was involved.
This is a purely educational/behavioral intervention delivered in an academic setting.
|
|
无干预：B.Pharm Control Group
Bachelor of Pharmacy (B.Pharm) 7th-semester students (n=17) who continued their standard curriculum without any dedicated Health Informatics instruction.
This group served as the non-equivalent control group.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Health Informatics Knowledge Score
大体时间：Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
Measured using the Health Informatics Knowledge Assessment Tool (HIKAT) - a validated 44-item multiple-select instrument with weighted partial-credit scoring.
Scores range from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicate better health informatics knowledge.
Administered to both groups at T1 (Week 1, pre-test) and T2 (Week 15, post-test).
The primary causal contrast is the between-group difference in gain scores (Δ = T2 - T1), analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test with bootstrapped effect sizes.
|
Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Domain-Specific Knowledge Gains Across Six HI Content Areas
大体时间：Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
Change in knowledge scores across six domain areas assessed using the Health Informatics Knowledge Assessment Tool (HIKAT): D1 General HI/Introduction to IT, D2 Operating Systems & Software, D3 Public Health & IT, D4 Database Management, D5+6 Data Analysis & Coding, and D7 Telemedicine.
Each domain score is expressed as a percentage of the domain maximum (minimum: 0%, maximum: 100%), where higher scores indicate greater domain-specific health informatics knowledge.
Domain gains are analyzed using Friedman test with Kendall W and Holm-corrected post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests within the intervention group.
|
Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Technological Awareness Across Digital Health Tools
大体时间：Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
Change in binary (Yes/No) awareness of 11 digital health tools: EHR, Telemedicine, HMIS, Public Health Informatics, GIS, HIMS, DBMS, Python, Programming Language, Telehealth Platforms, and Remote Patient Monitoring.
|
Baseline (Week 1) to post-intervention (Week 15)
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Dip Bahadur Singh、Axon Infotech Research Academy
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2026年4月15日
初级完成 (实际的)
2026年6月20日
研究完成 (实际的)
2026年6月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年7月2日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年7月7日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年7月8日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年7月8日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年7月7日
最后验证
2026年7月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- HI471-MBAHS-2026
- IRC-134-082-083 (注册表标识符：Madan Bhandari Academy of Health Sciences IRC)
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
IPD 计划说明
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because participants did not provide consent for their individual-level data to be shared with external researchers.
Additionally, the small sample size (n=34) increases the risk of participant re-identification, even with de-identification.
All aggregated, anonymized summary data are presented in the published manuscript and supplementary materials
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.