此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Clinical and Neurocomputational Effects of Behavioral Activation in Veterans With Impaired Social Functioning

2026年7月14日 更新者：VA Office of Research and Development
Poor psychosocial functioning, including social disconnection, is common and disabling among Veterans, and often fails to improve following the best available evidence-based treatments, particularly if more severe pathology is present. Behavioral activation (BA) is a promising, low-burden intervention, which could help improve social functioning impairments in Veterans, as this treatment targets social reward sensitivity, an important driving mechanism of social functioning. Thus, the proposed research will test whether BA can specifically improve social functioning in Veterans. Leveraging a neurocomputational framework of social reward seeking behavior, this research will help to improve the treatment and assessment of social function and the prediction of psychosocial treatment needs in Veterans, while providing neurobehavioral targets to develop new interventions that can restore social functioning.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Perceived social disconnection and social isolation are disabling and common among Veterans. Yet, these psychosocial impairments can fail to improve following the best available evidence-based treatments. Behavioral activation (BA), an evidence-based treatment for depression has shown promise in improving social functioning. However, most of this research was conducted in primarily non-Veteran populations and has typically relied on patients' subjective symptoms and self-report, in contrast to objective behavioral probes, to assess social functioning. Moreover, the cognitive mechanisms promoting social behavior remain poorly understood, particularly in Veterans. For instance, social anhedonia, i.e., a reduced sensitivity to social rewards, such as positive human interactions, has been implicated as an important driving mechanism of poor social functioning. Yet, the degree to which BA successfully target social reward sensitivity remains unclear and has not been evaluated in Veterans. This lack of understanding limits the ability to develop more targeted and effective interventions for psychosocial recovery. To address these gaps, this study aims to test the clinical and neurobehavioral effectiveness of BA in targeting social dysfunction in Veterans.

Computational models of reward learning (RL), particularly Bayesian RL learning models, can offer an important bridge to link in-vivo behavior, such as social reward sensitivity, and recovery outcomes like psychosocial functioning, by providing a rich quantitative representation of reward learning and its dynamic updating during reward exploration. This proposal aims to capitalize on this approach, combining a translational behavioral paradigm, Bayesian reinforcement learning modeling, and neuroscientific evaluation of change processes, in order to assay social anhedonia and improve prediction of social functioning as well as understanding and effective dissemination of BA treatment.

The specific aims are to: 1) test the effectiveness of BA in improving social functioning outcomes in Veterans (Aim 1); 2) examine the impact of BA on neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity and their relationship to social functioning improvement in Veterans (Aim 2); and 3) assess the degree to which neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity predict social functioning recovery in Veterans undergoing BA (Aim 3). This project will also explore whether the relationships between neurocomputational markers of social function and clinical outcomes are moderated by primary diagnosis (exploratory Aim 4).

Veterans (N=136) with impaired social functioning and anhedonia will be recruited and randomized to either behavioral activation (BA) or supportive care therapy (SCT; active control) over 12 weeks. At baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 12-weeks post-treatment (24-weeks follow-up), participants will complete a computerized task aimed at probing social reward-seeking behavior, in which they must choose between unknown partners with the goal of maximizing the number of compliments they receive from these partners. Concurrent brain activity will be collected with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a subset of participants (N=68; at baseline and post-treatment). Therapy sessions and follow-up (24-weeks) assessments will be administered through VA-approved telehealth methods. Computational modeling will be used to derive individual parameters of social reward (i.e., compliments) learning and maximization, and to extract associated neural activity, e.g., neural responses to prediction error signals (discrepancies between expected and actually obtained reward/compliment). Randomization of participants to treatment arms will be be stratified based on fMRI eligibility status, sex, and primary psychiatric diagnosis.

This project is expected to 1) determine if BA offers an effective, low-burden option to improve social functioning in Veterans; 2) identify potential neurocognitive targets, which could be used in future research to develop and test novel treatments to improve psychosocial functioning in Veterans, such as computerized neurocomputational training protocols to boost social reward sensitivity; and 3) help identify precise markers of BA responsiveness for functional recovery.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

136

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • San Diego、California、美国、92161-0002
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
        • 首席研究员：
          • Katia Harle, MD
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being a Veteran
  • having moderate to high levels of social disconnection (Social Connectedness Scale-Revised/SCS-R score < 90)
  • having moderate to high levels of social functioning impairments (Sheehan Disability Scale/SDS-social domain score >=5)
  • having moderate to high levels of social anhedonia (Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale/SLIPS score >= 6)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lifetime history of psychotic or bipolar disorder
  • neurological conditions, neurodevelopmental disorders, or sensory deficits that may impact cognitive functioning to preclude understanding/completion of study procedure
  • regular use of certain psychotropic medications that may significantly impact goal-directed performance on the task (i.e., benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and opioid analgesics); pre-existing stable doses of psychotropic medications, such as SSRIs, will be allowed (if same regimen has been taken for at least 30 days)
  • current severe alcohol or substance use disorders (AUD/SUD) necessitating prioritization of substance use treatment
  • suicidal or homicidal ideation within the past month necessitating urgent higher-level care
  • concurrent individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy specifically targeting depression, anhedonia, and/or PTSD

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Behavioral Activation (BA)
This arm provides the experimental treatment, i.e., Behavioral Activation therapy.
行为的：Behavioral Activation (BA)
BA is a structured behavioral protocol for depression, designed to help individuals increase engagement in meaningful and rewarding activities, thereby breaking the cycle of avoidance and inactivity that often accompanies depression. The protocol teaches patients to increase a) engagement in pleasant, reinforcing activities, with a strong emphasis on social engagement and social connection, b) exploration of values, and c) goal-setting and goal-directed behavior, while monitoring their mood and daily activities
有源比较器：Supportive Care Therapy (SCT)
This arm provides the active control treatment, i.e., Supportive Care Therapy.
行为的：Supportive Care Therapy (SCT)
SCT is a Rogerian non-directive approach and employs techniques to convey a deep understanding of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors of the Veterans receiving this treatment. Specific techniques include content-focused paraphrasing, exploration through open-ended questions (with a goal of empathic understanding), and emotion-focused reflection and validation. Consistent with the SCT model, the therapist will be explicitly instructed not to provide advice, assign activities, or suggest strategies and techniques employed in the BA intervention.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Social Connectedness Scale - Revised (SCS-R)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measures the degree to which individuals feel connected to others in their social environment. Scores range from 20 to 120, where higher scores indicate a stronger, healthier sense of social connectedness.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
The scale measures the degree of impairment in ability to interact effectively with others, fulfill social roles (e.g., work), and meet personal and societal expectations. It is comprised of 7 subscales. Each item ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater degree of impairment in psychosocial functioning.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale (SLIPS)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
This is a measure of social anhedonia, i.e., hypo-responsiveness to social rewards, such as positive human interactions. Scores range from 0 to 69. Higher scores indicate greater severity of social anhedonia.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Social Reward Maximization
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Computational parameter derived from behavioral social functioning probe (behavioral reinforcement learning task), capturing the degree to which individuals select social partners they predict to be more rewarding (to offer the most compliments).
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Neural Activation to Social Reward Prediction Errors (RPEs)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Average BOLD (Blood-Oxygenation-Level Dependent) % signal change (i.e., activation) associated with individuals' model-based RPE (difference between expected probability of reward/compliment and actual outcome received. i.e., compliment vs no-compliment).
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Primary Psychiatric Diagnosis
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Primary diagnostic category (i.e., depressive vs traumatic stress/anxiety disorder)
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measures quality of life and life satisfaction. Includes 4 domain subscales: physical health (range 7-35), psychological health (range 6-30), social relationships (range 3-15), and environment (range 8-42). Higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measures depression severity. Scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measures post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater PTSD severity.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
This scale measures anxiety severity. Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measure of anhedonia. Score range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater anhedonia severity.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Reaction to Treatment Questionnaire
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12-weeks)
Measure of treatment satisfaction and credibility of treatment rationale. Total scores range from 3 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and credibility in the treatment.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12-weeks)
Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (MASQ-D30)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Measure of anhedonic depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. The scale has three subscales (general distress, anhedonic depression, and anxious arousal) , with each score ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
大体时间：Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
Assesses the impact of social anxiety on multiple aspects of life. Scores range from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety.
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

VA Office of Research and Development

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Katia Harle, MD、VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2027年1月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2030年12月31日

研究完成 (估计的)

2030年12月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月29日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月8日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月14日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • RRD4-009-25W

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

One or more data sets without personal identifiers will be generated during the data analysis phase of this study. The data sets will include all data underlying any publications generated by this study as well as statistical code, and therefore these will be sufficient to reproduce or verify any published findings.

Any HIPAA identifiers, or combinations of variables that could be used for re-identification, will be excluded, as will any proprietary information. The plan does not include any access to individually identifiable or proprietary data. Therefore, this plan will ensure the protection of personal privacy, the confidentiality of individually identifiable private information, and the security of proprietary data and information.

IPD 共享时间框架

IPD and supporting information will become available upon completion of the study and publication of the the results.

IPD 共享访问标准

Final de-identified datasets in machine-readable format will be submitted to and accessed from PubMed Central (and similar sites); care will be taken to ensure that individuals cannot be re-identified using other publicly available information.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

在美国制造并从美国出口的产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅