- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT07697001
Clinical and Neurocomputational Effects of Behavioral Activation in Veterans With Impaired Social Functioning
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Perceived social disconnection and social isolation are disabling and common among Veterans. Yet, these psychosocial impairments can fail to improve following the best available evidence-based treatments. Behavioral activation (BA), an evidence-based treatment for depression has shown promise in improving social functioning. However, most of this research was conducted in primarily non-Veteran populations and has typically relied on patients' subjective symptoms and self-report, in contrast to objective behavioral probes, to assess social functioning. Moreover, the cognitive mechanisms promoting social behavior remain poorly understood, particularly in Veterans. For instance, social anhedonia, i.e., a reduced sensitivity to social rewards, such as positive human interactions, has been implicated as an important driving mechanism of poor social functioning. Yet, the degree to which BA successfully target social reward sensitivity remains unclear and has not been evaluated in Veterans. This lack of understanding limits the ability to develop more targeted and effective interventions for psychosocial recovery. To address these gaps, this study aims to test the clinical and neurobehavioral effectiveness of BA in targeting social dysfunction in Veterans.
Computational models of reward learning (RL), particularly Bayesian RL learning models, can offer an important bridge to link in-vivo behavior, such as social reward sensitivity, and recovery outcomes like psychosocial functioning, by providing a rich quantitative representation of reward learning and its dynamic updating during reward exploration. This proposal aims to capitalize on this approach, combining a translational behavioral paradigm, Bayesian reinforcement learning modeling, and neuroscientific evaluation of change processes, in order to assay social anhedonia and improve prediction of social functioning as well as understanding and effective dissemination of BA treatment.
The specific aims are to: 1) test the effectiveness of BA in improving social functioning outcomes in Veterans (Aim 1); 2) examine the impact of BA on neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity and their relationship to social functioning improvement in Veterans (Aim 2); and 3) assess the degree to which neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity predict social functioning recovery in Veterans undergoing BA (Aim 3). This project will also explore whether the relationships between neurocomputational markers of social function and clinical outcomes are moderated by primary diagnosis (exploratory Aim 4).
Veterans (N=136) with impaired social functioning and anhedonia will be recruited and randomized to either behavioral activation (BA) or supportive care therapy (SCT; active control) over 12 weeks. At baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 12-weeks post-treatment (24-weeks follow-up), participants will complete a computerized task aimed at probing social reward-seeking behavior, in which they must choose between unknown partners with the goal of maximizing the number of compliments they receive from these partners. Concurrent brain activity will be collected with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a subset of participants (N=68; at baseline and post-treatment). Therapy sessions and follow-up (24-weeks) assessments will be administered through VA-approved telehealth methods. Computational modeling will be used to derive individual parameters of social reward (i.e., compliments) learning and maximization, and to extract associated neural activity, e.g., neural responses to prediction error signals (discrepancies between expected and actually obtained reward/compliment). Randomization of participants to treatment arms will be be stratified based on fMRI eligibility status, sex, and primary psychiatric diagnosis.
This project is expected to 1) determine if BA offers an effective, low-burden option to improve social functioning in Veterans; 2) identify potential neurocognitive targets, which could be used in future research to develop and test novel treatments to improve psychosocial functioning in Veterans, such as computerized neurocomputational training protocols to boost social reward sensitivity; and 3) help identify precise markers of BA responsiveness for functional recovery.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Geschätzt)
Phase
- Phase 2
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienkontakt
- Name: Niloofar Afari, PhD
- Telefonnummer: (858) 642-3657
- E-Mail: Niloofar.Afari@va.gov
Studienorte
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92161-0002
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
-
Kontakt:
- Niloofar Afari, PhD
- Telefonnummer: 858-642-3657
- E-Mail: Niloofar.Afari@va.gov
-
Hauptermittler:
- Katia Harle, MD
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
- Erwachsene
- Älterer Erwachsener
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- being a Veteran
- having moderate to high levels of social disconnection (Social Connectedness Scale-Revised/SCS-R score < 90)
- having moderate to high levels of social functioning impairments (Sheehan Disability Scale/SDS-social domain score >=5)
- having moderate to high levels of social anhedonia (Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale/SLIPS score >= 6)
Exclusion Criteria:
- lifetime history of psychotic or bipolar disorder
- neurological conditions, neurodevelopmental disorders, or sensory deficits that may impact cognitive functioning to preclude understanding/completion of study procedure
- regular use of certain psychotropic medications that may significantly impact goal-directed performance on the task (i.e., benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and opioid analgesics); pre-existing stable doses of psychotropic medications, such as SSRIs, will be allowed (if same regimen has been taken for at least 30 days)
- current severe alcohol or substance use disorders (AUD/SUD) necessitating prioritization of substance use treatment
- suicidal or homicidal ideation within the past month necessitating urgent higher-level care
- concurrent individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy specifically targeting depression, anhedonia, and/or PTSD
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Behavioral Activation (BA)
This arm provides the experimental treatment, i.e., Behavioral Activation therapy.
|
BA is a structured behavioral protocol for depression, designed to help individuals increase engagement in meaningful and rewarding activities, thereby breaking the cycle of avoidance and inactivity that often accompanies depression.
The protocol teaches patients to increase a) engagement in pleasant, reinforcing activities, with a strong emphasis on social engagement and social connection, b) exploration of values, and c) goal-setting and goal-directed behavior, while monitoring their mood and daily activities
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Supportive Care Therapy (SCT)
This arm provides the active control treatment, i.e., Supportive Care Therapy.
|
SCT is a Rogerian non-directive approach and employs techniques to convey a deep understanding of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors of the Veterans receiving this treatment.
Specific techniques include content-focused paraphrasing, exploration through open-ended questions (with a goal of empathic understanding), and emotion-focused reflection and validation.
Consistent with the SCT model, the therapist will be explicitly instructed not to provide advice, assign activities, or suggest strategies and techniques employed in the BA intervention.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Social Connectedness Scale - Revised (SCS-R)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measures the degree to which individuals feel connected to others in their social environment.
Scores range from 20 to 120, where higher scores indicate a stronger, healthier sense of social connectedness.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
The scale measures the degree of impairment in ability to interact effectively with others, fulfill social roles (e.g., work), and meet personal and societal expectations.
It is comprised of 7 subscales.
Each item ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater degree of impairment in psychosocial functioning.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale (SLIPS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
This is a measure of social anhedonia, i.e., hypo-responsiveness to social rewards, such as positive human interactions.
Scores range from 0 to 69.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of social anhedonia.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Social Reward Maximization
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Computational parameter derived from behavioral social functioning probe (behavioral reinforcement learning task), capturing the degree to which individuals select social partners they predict to be more rewarding (to offer the most compliments).
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Neural Activation to Social Reward Prediction Errors (RPEs)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Average BOLD (Blood-Oxygenation-Level Dependent) % signal change (i.e., activation) associated with individuals' model-based RPE (difference between expected probability of reward/compliment and actual outcome received.
i.e., compliment vs no-compliment).
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Psychiatric Diagnosis
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Primary diagnostic category (i.e., depressive vs traumatic stress/anxiety disorder)
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measures quality of life and life satisfaction.
Includes 4 domain subscales: physical health (range 7-35), psychological health (range 6-30), social relationships (range 3-15), and environment (range 8-42).
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measures depression severity.
Scores range from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measures post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity.
Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater PTSD severity.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
This scale measures anxiety severity.
Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measure of anhedonia.
Score range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater anhedonia severity.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Reaction to Treatment Questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12-weeks)
|
Measure of treatment satisfaction and credibility of treatment rationale.
Total scores range from 3 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and credibility in the treatment.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12-weeks)
|
|
Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (MASQ-D30)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Measure of anhedonic depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms.
The scale has three subscales (general distress, anhedonic depression, and anxious arousal) , with each score ranging from 10 to 50.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
|
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Assesses the impact of social anxiety on multiple aspects of life.
Scores range from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety.
|
Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks)
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Katia Harle, MD, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)
Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
- Neurologische Manifestationen
- Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
- Neurobehaviorale Manifestationen
- Pathologische Zustände, Anzeichen und Symptome
- Verhalten
- Anzeichen und Symptome
- Soziales Verhalten
- Anhedonie
- Soziale Anpassung
- Therapeutika
- Patientenversorgung
- Gesundheitsdienste
- Belegschaft und Dienstleistungen für Gesundheitseinrichtungen
- Palliativpflege
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- RRD4-009-25W
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
One or more data sets without personal identifiers will be generated during the data analysis phase of this study. The data sets will include all data underlying any publications generated by this study as well as statistical code, and therefore these will be sufficient to reproduce or verify any published findings.
Any HIPAA identifiers, or combinations of variables that could be used for re-identification, will be excluded, as will any proprietary information. The plan does not include any access to individually identifiable or proprietary data. Therefore, this plan will ensure the protection of personal privacy, the confidentiality of individually identifiable private information, and the security of proprietary data and information.
IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen
IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Social Anhedonia
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiNoch keine Rekrutierung
-
Versailles HospitalAbgeschlossen
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNoch keine RekrutierungSocial Media bei der Entwicklung eines gesunden Lebensstilverhaltens bei schwangeren FrauenTruthahn
-
Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLRekrutierungVerlangen | Sucht nach sozialen Medien | Internetsucht | Verlangen nach Social-Media-NutzungPortugal
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Noch keine RekrutierungJunge Erwachsene | Nichtmedizinischer Konsum verschreibungspflichtiger Opioide in den letzten drei Monaten | Ohne Substanzgebrauchsstörungen | Social-Media-NutzerVereinigte Staaten
-
Government College University FaisalabadAktiv, nicht rekrutierendKognitive Verhaltenstherapie bei Social-Media-SuchtPakistan
Klinische Studien zur Behavioral Activation (BA)
-
Truway Health, Inc.Anmeldung auf EinladungSitzendes Verhalten | Gesundheitsverhalten | VerhaltensaktivierungVereinigte Staaten
-
Noctrix Health, Inc.Noch keine RekrutierungSyndrom der ruhelosen BeineÖsterreich
-
ElMindA LtdUnbekanntGesund | Kognitive Beeinträchtigung | Neurologische StörungVereinigte Staaten
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRekrutierung
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRekrutierung
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRekrutierung
-
BioNTech SEPfizerAbgeschlossenCOVID-19 | SARS-CoV-2-InfektionVereinigte Staaten
-
Providence VA Medical CenterAbgeschlossenDepression | DiabetesVereinigte Staaten
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain; Obra Social de La CaixaAktiv, nicht rekrutierend
-
Korea Health Industry Development InstituteAbgeschlossenParkinson KrankheitKorea, Republik von